Testing Medal
The DOJ targets e-gold
Since 1996 e-gold has enabled consumers to use private digital currencies backed by precious metals. In April a federal grand jury indicted the enterprise, its parent company, and three of its officers on charges that include money laundering, conspiracy, and operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business.
The company has been under investigation since before a 2005 Secret Service raid that ended with no charges filed. When it announced the new indictments, the Department of Justice declared that "the E-Gold payment system has been a preferred means of payment for child pornography distributors, identity thieves, online scammers, and other criminals around the world to launder their illegal income anonymously."
E-gold's founder, Douglas Jackson vehemently denies the accusations. Whenever law enforcement officials inform the company of suspected criminal activity using e-gold, he says, the company shuts down the accounts used for such purposes. He also notes that the business is a founding member of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children's Financial Coalition Against Child Pornography, dedicated to finding and stopping online sellers of child porn.
E-gold also carries out its own internal investigations aimed at ferreting out criminals. A December 2006 article in Wired details some of the ways the company uses records of e-gold transactions to nab people buying and selling stolen credit card information. Among other things, it blocks their accounts and the accounts of the people to whom they gave e-gold, and it turns over information to the authorities. That last action, according to the Wired story, set off Kevin Bankston, staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, who thinks it violated e-gold's stated privacy policy.
Jackson claimed in congressional testimony last fall that e-gold was second only to PayPal in the online transaction business, with 3 million e-gold accounts held in 165 countries, doing transactions totaling $2 billion a year. But the DOJ seized his company's assets of $1.5 million in e-gold along with the indictment. Between that and its now-tarnished reputation, e-gold's future will be in serious doubt whatever the outcome of the trial.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
jxstg