Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

One Vote for Starchild

Jesse Walker | 11.8.2006 12:10 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

If you miss ex-Reasoner Tim Cavanaugh's exhaustive exhumations of how he votes, don't fret: His latest ballot is on display at the L.A. Times.

Update: And now it's gone. Bootleg copies are rumored to be fetching high prices at the bloggers' bazaar.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Web-Allen, Ct'd...

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

PoliticsCampaigns/Elections
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (14)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. The Johnny Appleseed of Crack   19 years ago

    We need to come to a consensus on write-in candidates so that maybe there will be enough write in votes for the same person that it will be listed in the election results. My vote is for "Big Brother". Or maybe an equal divide between "Giant Douche", and "Turd Sandwich".
    Any others?

  2. Trea   19 years ago

    A friend of mine at work (big government type) voted for Starchild just because of the name. I used to see Starchild often at LP SF meetings, and we sometimes joked about this phenomenon. What's funnier is that my coworker thought, for some reason, that Starchild was a female stripper from San Francisco. At least he got the San Francisco part right. Perhaps his thinking Starchild was a stripper was a cognitive remnant of the Gubernatorial bru ha ha that Arnie won.

  3. The Wine Commonsewer   19 years ago

    I also voted no on every judge. In fact, except for the nod to Schwarzengroper, that could have been my ballot.

  4. Bee   19 years ago

    "The Dude".

  5. The Wine Commonsewer   19 years ago

    Well, except for the SF stuff. Okay, I didn't vote for Starchild, Brown, or any Republicans.

  6. Chris   19 years ago

    What, no endorsement of Hugh Jim Bissell?

  7. Ammonium   19 years ago

    With a ballot that long, you'd have to take a day off to vote.

  8. methodman   19 years ago

    Proposition 85 Waiting Period and Parental
    Notification Before Termination of Minor's Pregnancy..: Yes

    Really? huh.

  9. Devin McCullen   19 years ago

    On the San Fran school board members, I have 3 possible theories:

    1)They were write-ins and Tim forgot to mention it

    2)The method of choice was "Wackiest Names"

    3)Hey, it's San Francisco. You should have seen the ones he didn't vote for.

  10. Bill G   19 years ago

    Starchild was running in District 8 and I live in 2, or he'd have gotten my vote!

    The Eminent Domain statewide initiative [90] was looking good early, but has recently gone negative.

    http://vote.ss.ca.gov/Returns/prop/00.htm

    As this time [11:30pm Pacific] the entire lead by "No" is from San Francisco's 80,000 No vote margin.

    I hope my neighbor's houses get taken first.

  11. some bored guy   19 years ago

    He's got pics on the web.

    /TGTDN.
    //The Goggles, They Do Nothing.

  12. Johncjackson   19 years ago

    The link doesnt work

  13. Rhywun   19 years ago

    California voted down a cigarette tax??? Wow. Oh, heavy support in SF, I see. Living as a smoker in SF was an exercise in punishment - and contributed to my moving away.

  14. iami   19 years ago

    I wrote in: Inky, Blinky, Pinky and Clyde. I would so love to have an orange ghost as my congressional rep.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!