Tune In, Turn On, Turnout
Mike Allen's obligatory "Republican comeback?" story in TIME reveals more than it was supposed to. Allen's evidence for chinks in the opposition's armor doesn't include the Great Victimization Gambit of '06, but it does include this info from the Republican chairman:
Ken Mehlman, chairman of the Republican National Committee, says the opposition hasn't sold a vision for handling terrorism, Iraq or jobs. He also cites a drop-off in turnout for most Democratic primaries this year as one sign that the Dems aren't strong enough to mount a takeover of power on Capitol Hill.
This would be great news for Republicans, spending problems, Iraq debacle and all, if it were true. Alas, it isn't. Democratic turnout has actually remained steady or surged in most states that held primaries this year. Most Republicans who echo Mehlman's spin focus on Florida, and while turnout there plunged from 1,357,017 in 2002 to 857,814 in 2006, that had a lot to do with the fact 2002 saw an expensive, hard-fought battle that included former U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno. Compare that to the trends in other states:
Minnesota gubernatorial primary, Sept. 12
2002: 224,238
2006: 316,470, up 41 percent.
Massachusetts gubernatorial primary, Sept. 19
2002: 746,190
2006: 910,877, up 22 percent
Hawaii gubernatorial primary, Sept. 23
2002: 188,781
2006: 238,069, up 26 percent
While poking around for examples I noticed that Missouri did see a decrease in Democratic turnout, from 368,149 to 289,573, down 21 percent. But Republican turnout fell even further, from 395,994 to 282,767, down 29 percent.
What's this mean? 1) Republicans are very, very good at crafting a narrative based on a few polls. 2) If Ken Mehlman says something, fact-check it. 3) Seriously, don't trust Mehlman. From what I've heard this week, the only boost Republicans have seen is the mid-single-digit boost they're getting in some districts thanks to lower gas prices.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"This would be great news for Republicans ... if it was true. Alas, it isn't."
If it's not true, then your sentence calls for the subjunctive mood: "... if it were true."
Don't forget us in CT, where we just had 41% turnout for the Democratic primary which swept Ned LAmont into the candidacy. Record state primary turnout.
Primaries are different animals from general elections. If there is no race, especially in closed states, there is no incentive to show up.
I live in an open primary state (Minnesota), in 2004 I voted for in the Republican primary (trying to play games and get a convicted guy living in Italy nominated for congress).
lol
I like your style Gopher.