Iraqi Occupation: In a Growth Phase

|

More troops will probably be in Iraq at the end of the year then there are now, AP reports, as an extra 5,000 are sent in to Baghdad to quell escalating violence there:

The Pentagon signaled plans to maintain or possibly increase the current level of about 130,000 troops in Iraq, by announcing that roughly 21,000 Army soldiers and Marines have been told they are scheduled to go to Iraq during the current 2006-2008 rotation.

Combined with two previous announcements of about 113,000 U.S. service members scheduled for the rotation period, this could bring the number of U.S. troops there to 134,000, if all are deployed.

Military commanders have said deployments depend on conditions in Iraq. But the latest announcement calls into question whether the Pentagon could significantly reduce troop levels in Iraq by year's end as commanders had hoped.

Back in 2003, our own Tim Cavanaugh discussed stop-loss, one of the military's techniques for keeping its numbers robust. The military does insist that it will be meeting its recruitment goals this year–sounds like they'll definitely need it.

NEXT: Every Man a Murrow

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. We must move forward, not backward, upward, but forward, and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom!

  2. Not much observation of the Iraq war is required to see that the insurgency is using Bush’s unwillingness to send alot more troops to their advantage.

    By working on one area, they force us to withdraw troops from other areas to deal with it. When we do that, they move to attack the areas we made weaker by the troop movement. Watch, in a month they will start hitting areas where we moved troops. That cycle has been going on since the first year.

    There can be little doubt that the insurgency is in control of the tempo.

  3. Unwillingness? I’d say incapability is more accurate.

  4. but who will guard our southern border?

  5. The military equivalent of taking a shot of herion to quell your withdrawal pains.

    The difference being, George Bush knows that he will get to pass his addiction off to someone else in two and a half years.

  6. joe, that’s fucking awesome.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.