Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password
Reason logo

Reason's Annual Webathon is underway! Donate today to see your name here.

Reason is supported by:
Robert Millhollen

Donate

Losing by Less

Jacob Sullum | 6.28.2006 6:00 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The Marijuana Policy Project reports that the Hinchey-Rohrabacher amendment, aimed at stopping the federal attack on the medical use of marijuana, was defeated today but attracted more votes in the House than ever before: 163, up two from last year.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: You May Qualify to Be a U.S. Citizen!

Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason. He is the author, most recently, of Beyond Control: Drug Prohibition, Gun Regulation, and the Search for Sensible Alternatives (Prometheus Books).

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (19)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. sedated   19 years ago

    So if this trend continues, in 50 years it will pass.

  2. AC   19 years ago

    Hooray?

  3. ChicagoTom   19 years ago

    Is this supposed to be considered a moral victory?

  4. zanu   19 years ago

    Wish they'd post the roll call, and I hope to Jah my Congressman voted yes. He's one of the "most vulnerable Republicans" in Congress identified by the DNC, and I've got a promise to drive around with the Democrat challenger's bumpersticker on my car if he voted against this one again, which should cause a good deal of friction in the family as the Congressman is a friend of ma and pa.

  5. juris imprudent   19 years ago

    And they say marijuana doesn't affect the brain.

  6. Luke Brown   19 years ago

    The roll call has now been updated and can be found here.

  7. joshua corning   19 years ago

    wow we didn't loos as bad as we did last year...yippy..

    sorry to be a downer but I just looked up who my counties contact for the libertarian party...this guy:

    http://www.cornertheweb.com/billallyn/index.htm

    I think in a year or two I might have to stage a coup.

  8. rm2muv   19 years ago

    Holy cow! My Ultra-Republican congressman voted aye. I THOUGHT he inhaled.

  9. Adam W.   19 years ago

    Wow-Tancredo voted Aye?

  10. Isaac Bartram   19 years ago

    My rep voted no (predictably). Problem is, that except on the various "wars" he's not a bad guy. But on those he's a real asshole.

  11. jf   19 years ago

    I'm stunned that my congressman (and future Senator) Sherrod Brown voted aye. Too bad he's such a protectionist prick, but considering how reprehensible Mike DeWine is, Brown can only be an improvement.

  12. Mo   19 years ago

    I'm split, my old Rep in CA, Jane Harman, voted Aye. Sadly, my current Rep, Chris "Count" Chocola, voted no. Curse you red state rep.

  13. jf   19 years ago

    Just in case anyone has ever wondered what would happen if Superman and Spider-man were in the same (Italian) movie.

  14. Mo   19 years ago

    SCOTUS rules 5-3 for Hamdan.

  15. dhex   19 years ago

    "http://www.cornertheweb.com/billallyn/index.htm"

    holy fucking shit we are doomed

  16. sedated   19 years ago

    My NYC GOP congressman Vito Fossella voted no predictably. I think his positions are identical to Sean Hannity on most issues.

  17. zanu   19 years ago

    Looks like I'll be sporting a new bumpersticker.
    Kirsten Gillibrand for Congress!

  18. Kwix   19 years ago

    Yet again Don "Pocket Lining" Young voted against it. You would think that in a state of only 600,000 people, 58% of whom voted yes to a MMJ proposition this would be a point of contention for his reelection but I have yet to find an instance of where that is the case.

  19. Scatamousche   19 years ago

    This is a state's rights issue but all the drug-warriors see is a supposed "trojan horse" to get marijuana legalized. Republicans would have you believe that they are for state's rights but obviously that is total BS.

    A special thanks to Luke Brown for linking the roll call.

    Scatamousche

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Webathon 2025: Dec. 2 - Dec. 9 Thanks to 778 donors, we've reached $534,550 of our $400,000 $600,000 goal!

Reason Webathon 2023

Donate Now

Latest

Why I Support Reason with a Tax-Deductible Donation (and You Should Too!)

Nick Gillespie | 12.7.2025 8:00 AM

Trump Thinks a $100,000 Visa Fee Would Make Companies Hire More Americans. It Could Do the Opposite.

Fiona Harrigan | From the January 2026 issue

Virginia's New Blue Trifecta Puts Right-To-Work on the Line

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 12.6.2025 7:00 AM

Ayn Rand Denounced the FCC's 'Public Interest' Censorship More Than 60 Years Ago

Robby Soave | From the January 2026 issue

Review: Progressive Myths Rebuts the Left's Histrionic Takes

Jack Nicastro | From the January 2025 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

HELP EXPAND REASON’S JOURNALISM

Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.

Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREEDOM

Your donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks