And We Didn't Take No Rides on No Surries, Neither
Act fast! If you hurry up and support the gay marriage amendment, maybe your family will grow up as fine as Sen. James Inhofe's (R-Okla.):
As you see here, and I think this is maybe the most important prop we'll have during the entire debate, my wife and I have been married 47 years. We have 20 kids and grandkids. I'm really proud to say that in the recorded history of our family, we've never had a divorce or any kind of homosexual relationship.
If they can take a short respite from their constant breeding, the Inhofes might stage an intervention with these sick creeps.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Why does this make me think of Gary Hart? I suspect the Inhofe family will be under close scrutiny for awhile, and insofar as most of them have not asked for it, I feel sorry for them.
When the Inhofe family throws a party and invites the VP, I betcha the VP is still obligated to join in the fistivities.
Even money, one of his family comes out in the next six weeks.
In sports we call this a "woofing," and woofing is generally followed by some horribly embarressing choke performance by your team.
Is that Anderson Cooper next to the big Dick Cheney?
There are a couple other breathtakingly moronic exerpts here. I particularly like the insistence that somehow gay marriage is going to result in more kids being on welfare.
What a self-defeating argument. He is pointing out that his family has been (in his opinion, successfully) non-gay, IN A TIME WHEN THERE WAS NO AMENDMENT.
This whole same-sex marriage debate reminds me of CX Policy debate in high school. Only instead of everything eventually ending in nuclear holocaust it's kids on welfare and more people with "Teh Gay". Although, if Pat Robertson (strongest man in the world!) is to be believed, the nuclear holocaust thing can't be all that far off.
Um, why is Dick pointing out the "little brown ones" to Dana Carvey, while Carvey does his impression of himself dressed as George HW Bush impersonating Church Lady?
No gays in the family?
None that survived.
Someone better start digging up the cellar at Casa Inhofe.
Woofing?
Infohe's tastes run to the love that dare not bark its name.
- Josh
Really? I thought he was one of the goatfuckers....
Are the motherfuckers ready for the fatherfuckers
are the fatherfuckers ready for the motherfuckers
Peaches,
I'm pleased to report, both mothers and fathers are up to their armpits in equanimity and sang-froid.
To paraphrase Mary Poppins: A little bit of Wesson Oil makes the piston and cylinder combust like a diesel.
Did that answer your question?