Hey, It Worked For James Brown and Afrika Bambaataa

|

Behold the Unity campaign, a political movement whose seriousness is somewhere between the Perot boomlet and an episode of Sesame Street.

This Internet-based third party is spearheaded by three veterans of the antique 1976 campaign: Democrats Hamilton Jordan and Gerald Rafshoon helped get Jimmy Carter elected; Republican Doug Bailey did media for Gerald Ford before launching the political TIP SHEET Hotline. They are joined by the independent former governor of Maine, Angus King, and a collection of idealistic young people who are also tired of a nominating process that pulls the major party candidates to the extremes. Their hope: to get even a fraction of the 50 million who voted for the next American Idol to nominate a third-party candidate for president online and use this new army to get him or her on the ballot in all 50 states. The idea is to go viral–or die. "The worst thing that could happen would be for a bunch of old white guys like us to run this," Jordan says.

How is it not run by old white guys already?

The "issues" page of this party-without-a-point is expectedly gooey. The party's concerned with "Global terrorism, our national debt, our dependence on foreign oil, the emergence of India and China as strategic competitors and/or allies," and so on, but doesn't have any stances on the problems themselves. Our current political parties were formed around the ideals of ending slavery and screwing over John Quincy Adams, respectively. What chance does this top-down, slogans-before-ideas style of politicking have?

UPDATE: Explanation of this post's title here.

NEXT: Message to Dan Brown: Blasphemy Doesn't Pay

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. “It Worked For James Brown and Afrika Bambaataa”

    Huh?

  2. While I’d love to see a viable third party develop and i’d even tune in to watch an episode or two of, ‘So You Think You Can Govern,’ I’m not sure that throw offs from both Carter and Ford (white or not) are the folks who are going to make this happen.

  3. “It Worked For James Brown and Afrika Bambaataa”

    Huh?

    The worked together on the single “Unity”

  4. “The worked together on the single ‘Unity'”

    Thank you! And I should add that this idea is one of the most retarded things I’ve ever read. To the extent there’s any merit in the underlying idea, it would seem to make much more sense to partner with an existing, but rudderless, third party like the Reform Party.

  5. I agree with the basic point of the article, but how does a…top-down, slogans-before-ideas style of politicking… differ from the Demopublicans current ‘style of politicking’?

  6. So, no Corrupt Bargain no Democratic Party and no President Jackson?

    Oh the tangled web we weave, etc.

  7. You’re either with us, or you’re with the strategic competitors and/or allies.

  8. America is in some big trouble. While crucial issues cry out for leadership, Washington’s parties and politicians are polarized and paralyzed.

    <Expletive deleted> “Polarized” would imply that at least one of the two parties was against universal health care, gutting the Constitution to prosecute the war on drugs/terrorism, big government, and tax-and-spend. The parties emphasize prolife and gun control issues because on all the “crucial issues” they march in lockstep.

    “Paralyzed” is a good thing.

  9. SmokingPenguin – The Demopublicans have the fund-raising infrastructure to get away with it.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.