The Ideal Platonic Blog Post
You can now stop reading blog comment threads forever. Jim Henley and his readers have stripped away all but the essentials to reveal the pure form of the blog post/discussion, producing what Radley Balko calls "one of the greatest collaborative compositions in the history of the Internet."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Don’t read this.
rejoinder
uncleaver aftr jkoe
Blames all on corn syrup. Points to discovery process as vehicle for scientific discovery.
First!
I was going to read through all of the comments on there, but it just keeps going! IT’s (h)UGE!
Ceci n’est pas une poste.
Comment posted while wasting time at work reading blog after blog after blog…
/me propositions Reason Pillow Girl despite her non-presence on the blog today
Irrelevant-to-thread humor.
Obligatory fart joke
Trollish nonsensical remark followed by overgeneralizing insult–e.g., You are all idiots if you don’t agree with my wrong-on-its-face assertion.
the roman empire did things differently, which is why our civilization is going down the tubes.
All of this ignores the real problem, which is George W. Bush!
pointless introduction:
A) useless point for argumentative aesthetics
B) useless point for argumentative aesthetics
C) unclear argument
another unclear rehash of fallacious statement made in C with adhominem.
Equivocation due to harsh languge in unclear rehash.
* Ctrl-A delete to start over *
* Back button because a sense of humor is lacking *
Turn off your caps lock key, idiot!
I don’t think the idea is that we repeat the experiment on H&R.
Comment by matthew hogan ?
April 9, 2006 @ 5:14 am
Nobody expects some kind of obscure Monty Python allusion.
We must do something to stop the youth diabetes epidemic.
The only thing I don’t see is the comment that was deleted without a trace.
Post calling somebody a conservatarian when clearly he is a statist.
o rly?
ha! i win.
It’s all the fault of the scam called child support and those damn feminists.
Reference to the band Hitler’s Missing Testicle.
Jennifer, you ignorant slut.
Statement made by conservative that libertarians are naive and out of touch with reality.
Statement made by liberal that libertarians are naive and out of touch with reality.
Statement made by liberal that libertarians are naive and out of touch with reality.
Three or more paragraphs composed principally of compound-complex sentences, with one (or, too frequently, more) parenthetical expressions(s) per paragraph. Recently Googled quotes and/or HTMLs adding a patina of ersatz authority in lieu of genuine erudition or personal insight. Relatively dry commentary of an obliquely didactic nature occasionally punctuated with expressions of wry bemusement or what, in any case, by blog standards, passes for it. Too many commas.
Statement made by liberal that libertarians are naive and out of touch with reality.
Statement by libertarian implying that non-libertarians are either evil or just haven’t thought it through clearly.
I am smarter than you. You are idiots.
Hey, JMJ, I already did that one! 🙂
Wish for unlikely misfortune aimed at Phil.
Repeated post; reference to squirrels that power the server.
Repeated post; reference to squirrels that power the server.
Explanation of what a libertarian ought to believe.
Surly condemnation of Christians.
Post with a reference to A Titled Work but with failure to close the HTML tags so that almost the entire multi-line post is in italics, and so on and so on and so on.
Apology for HTML error in previous post.
Incoherent post by a noob who has obviously never read anything on the site before, accusing everyone of rabidly pro-Bush partisan views that no one here actually holds.
Statement by Jersey McJ asserting that if Libertarians were true to their philosophy they should be uniformly against collaberative compositions.
Iraq is the next Vietnam.
Post for the express purpose of saying that this thread is so boring it’s not even worth the time to post in.
Condemning post about how those ‘whole foods’ wackos are against the progress of bio-engineering followed immediately by a statement of “that being said I shop at Whole Foods on occasion.”
This thread is stupid.
This thread is stupid.
Sorry about the double post.
Sorry about the double post.
Sorry about the double post.
emphatic post expressing the idea that I can criticize something without wanting to make it illegal!
Use of a Latin phrase without explaining its meaning.
What this thread needs is for Jennifer to get naked and wash her hair.
I’m new to this but I must say this is the best blog site ever. I’m bookmarking it!
Kerry would have been worse.
[Insert Ayn Rand joke here.]
[Insert angry post from Objectivist here.]
Threat to cancel my subscription.
Comment from the Reason Pillow Girl.
Followed by Cavanaugh banning the poster who signed on as the Reason Pillow Girl.
obscure reading assignment before embarrasment
Another abusive comment about the server squirrels!!
Reference is made to the blue guy
My attorney Delores Blasingame tells me that I can sue all of you for income lost due to my having to read through all of these useless posts.
And I’m suing my wife for buying me the computer and my daughter April for not doing her homework on the computer thereby impeding me from having been trapped inside this thread.
(weeps uncontrollably)
Complaint about the carpet humper.
I’ll put my money on Carpet Humping Guy to kick Chuck Norris’s ass any day of the week.
And that goes for Jack Bauer too!
A promise to subscribe to Reason if a certain person shuts up.
A post lambasting Christards.
A quick rebuttal stating that “We Christards are at least Holy enough to restart the Inquisition.”
Tired and Cliche Monty Python quote.
Chuck Norris blog would totally kick Jack Bauer’s blogs ass!
In Soviet Russia, comments blog you!
Post sneering at the wrong use of term “serfdom”
No matter what Bush did, so did Clinton
Ayn Rand farting joke, with praise for Howard Stern
Howard STern farting joke, with praise for Ayn Rand
Howard Stern/Ayn Rand joke, with praise for farting
animal sex act animal sex act animal sex act animal sex act animal sex act animal sex act animal sex act animal sex act animal sex act animal sex act animal sex act animal sex act animal sex act animal sex act animal sex act
Insert obligatory list of libertarian disclaimers here.
Comment relating the post to my own personal situation, implying that it should likewise apply to the personal circumstances of all other readers. High-handed brushoff of anticipated objection.
Additional comment pointing out that not all vegetarians care if you eat steak.
Afterthought apologizing for the somewhat strident tone of the first paragraph.
BUSH LIED!!!
No, he didn’t. You’re an idiot!
Yes, he did! And YOU are the idiot! I’m just a Democrat.
No, I’m not! I’m a Republican!
Same thing!
So are you!
I think all of you guys just need to cool down the idealogy a bit. I mean us joe schmoes just want to get by and all this talk of freedom just grates on the nerves, I mean whats in it for the little guy, you know?
Your friend in the “mainstream”,
BSDM Man
As usual, Jennifer and thoreau are stinking up the place with their disgusting lack of logic. Not too mention, thoreau’s Papistry prevents him from understanding higher concepts or from accepting that god never existed, while Jennifer is just as stupid as a doorknob.
Not to mention, I am a genius.
Deal with it.
I thought knobbers were something one did to doorks.
I thought knobbers were something one did to doorks.
Comment by: smartassed sob at April 13, 2006 03:41 AM
What an imbecilic comment, I will box your ears for your impertinance!
I thought knobbers were something one did to doorks.
Comment by: smartassed sob at April 13, 2006 03:41 AM
What an imbecilic comment, I will box your ears for your impertinance!
ivy:
CLINTON DID TOO!!!!!
Insinuation that I have far in-depth professional knowledge of the topic at hand, while in reality I know nothing.
Sneer at the obvious ignorance here of everyone but me.
“We Christards are at least Holy enough to restart the Inquisition.”
Impassioned and overly-scholarly defense of the motivations behind the Albigensian crusade of 1209.
Irritated dismissal of all libertarians opposing some vast expansion of government as hopelessly purist.
saddened statement bereft of capital letters analyzing the topic at hand. whether the question is an expansion or (tiny) contraction of government, it is clear that whatever happens, it is a sign of the relentless death spiral of government into utter tyranny, something that mirrors the overall decline of western civilization for the past seven hundred years. head-shaking explanation that freedom is just a selfish desire for heedless autonomy and that slavery isn’t really all that bad in a society better suited to achieving the ineffable state of universal purpose. many, many words rarely broken up by paragraphs, monolithic piles of verbiage allowing the eye no purchase on sentence-structure.
Anarchy would be better! This is the last comment I’ll make in this topic.
Smug observation that only lawyers can solve this problem.
Repeated posts with different names set, just to mess with people.
Horrified question to the effect of, “OMG, do you people really oppose big government? Are you crazy?”
This blog is great. Keep it up! And take a look at [messed-up link]
Add Hominem; stir over open flame
‘
“We Christards are at least Holy enough to restart the Inquisition.”
Impassioned and overly-scholarly defense of the motivations behind the Albigensian crusade of 1209. ‘
Acid rebuttal from self-described neo-Cathar.
Server squirrel complaint
Comment that I do want to respond to a point even though this has fallen off the main page.
The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread. The inevitable fate of any thread.
This is the blog that never ends.
It goes on and on my friend
Some people starting posting not knowing what it was
Now they are still posting because..