Fluid Check
Drug test debunking.
Nearly two decades after drug testing started catching on in U.S. workplaces, it is still relatively unusual in the U.K.
A new report from an independent British commission suggests it should stay that way.
The Independent Inquiry Into Drug Testing in the Workplace, a project funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation and assisted by the think tank DrugScope, did 18 months of research, including surveys, reviews of the scientific literature, and input from experts, employers, and drug test providers. Its report, available at www.jrf.org.uk, concludes that "the evidence does not provide much support for alarmist claims about the impact of drug use on absenteeism, turnover, productivity or reputation. Nor has it been demonstrated that drug testing has a significant deterrent effect."
Even in safety-sensitive jobs, the commissioners recommend direct measurement of impairment, where feasible, rather than tests that detect traces of drugs long after their effects have worn off. "While it can have a useful role in some industries," they conclude, drug testing "is no substitute for good management practice."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
chrt