"No Law" 2004
The First Amendment Center has posted a Supreme Court wrap-up for this term, concluding that the hallowed 1st has taken a "back seat in the court's jurisprudence." The wrap-up rightly pegs McConnell v. FEC as the term's major free speech case, and cites an attorney in that fight on the decision:
It almost reads like a tax case rather than a First Amendment case. In style, tone and nature, it reads like an opinion about regulation by government of some sort of improper activity.
Can we at least start having tax cases that read like First Amendment cases to compensate?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Again, what part of "No Law" don't they understand?