Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Bullets vs Ballots

Tim Cavanaugh | 3.22.2004 4:34 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

New at Reason: How does the majority of the world keep Libya from running the United Nations' Human Rights Commission? Jonathan Rauch looks at the newly forming "democracy caucus" in Geneva.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Many Lives of Michael Jacobson

Tim Cavanaugh
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (11)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Jean Bart   21 years ago

    Does a list exist of these democracies? Does it include Russia?

  2. Shannon Love   21 years ago

    I think Jean Bart makes an important point. How are we going to decide who's a true democracy and who just holds pro forma elections without a free press or true competition?

    To get true international institutions off the ground we need some sort of organic linkage that could only arise between true democracies. Some type of standard that couldn't be easily politically faked. Perhaps something like transnational property rights would work.

  3. Amy Phillips   21 years ago

    Note: The following is my own opinion, and I do not speak for any organization. That said, I work for Freedom House, the organization that spearheaded the movement to finally get this thing off the ground, so I have somewhat of an inside scoop.

    The deal is this: The Community of Democracies is a pre-existing group of Foreign Ministers of democratic nations that meets every few years to discuss human rights/democracy/saving the world. Its membership was decided by the membership, and is fixed (for now). What we did when trying to hash out who should be a member of the Democracy Caucus, we decided that rather than wrangle with coming up with a new set of criteria, we would simply take the membership of the COD and invite those nations' UN Reps to participate. It means that there are a few not-so-democratic democracies on the list, but it also means that we didn't have to have a years long battle over who should get to join and we could instead get to the business of actually forming the thing.

    A list of the COD member nations can be found at the Seoul Conference website.

  4. meep   21 years ago

    Wow, a 99% positive Reason article! Someone take a screenshot... Theoretical problems aside, this is the first thing to give me hope in the UN in years.

  5. T&Atheism   21 years ago

    Holy Guests!

    If you follow the link that Amy provided you will find that the Holy See, THE HISTORICAL BEACON AND BASTION OF DEMOCRACY, was a "Guest" at the "Democracy: Investing for Peace and Prosperity" Seoul Conference...

    Irony? Any One?

    Bueller?.....

  6. Jean Bart   21 years ago

    T&Atheism,

    The Catholic Church has been and remains one of the most illiberal institutions of human creation. Indeed, its anti-liberty stances on procreative choice is a primary example of this; that, and its rampant attacks on capitalism.

  7. Jigga Wha   21 years ago

    Not that this has anything to do with anything, but what went wrong with the map in that link??

    The coastlines range from really, really detailed (Canada, Japan), to the borderline obscene (Kamchatka, SE Asia). Also, Canada is the only place in the world with lakes.

    Again, it's not important or anything, I'd just like to know what they were smoking when they made that.

  8. JP2   21 years ago

    Jean Bart,

    Kiss my Parkinson's-infected ass.

  9. AB2   21 years ago

    JP2,

    Kiss my Gonorrhea-infested ass.

  10. Andrew   21 years ago

    Back in the 80's, when Gary Hart touted the idea in his book, Reason panned it.

  11. Greg Foley   21 years ago

    I see that Russia is indeed a member of the "Community of Democracies," despite their quasi-democracy.

    I do think that the United Nations is a horrible organization and would better be replaced by something like the Community of Democracies. But consider some other possibilities:
    1) It should be eliminated and not replaced by anything. I think Darwinian competition among governments will produce a better outcome for the human race than one government, good or bad (I see the UN as tending to replace national governemnts over time).
    2) A UN where votes were allocated based on GDP. Governments which destroy prosperity won't be able to have much impact.
    3) A Community of Capitalist Nations. Those rated "mostly free" or better by the Index of Economic Freedom (http://www.heritage.org/research/features/index/countries.html) would be eligible to join. Most of the world's GDP is represented by those countries. Some of the major nations that wouldn't make the list include Russia, China, and India.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

No, Tariffs Can't Replace Income Taxes

Veronique de Rugy | 8.21.2025 3:05 PM

Socialism Just Imploded in Bolivia

César Báez | 8.21.2025 1:50 PM

Tulsi Gabbard Fends Off Europe's Antitech Tyrants—for Now

Robby Soave | 8.21.2025 1:27 PM

Film Subsidies Weren't Enough To Keep Marvel in Georgia

Joe Lancaster | 8.21.2025 1:00 PM

Trump's Deportation Goals

Liz Wolfe | 8.21.2025 9:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300