Data: InvestaPundit
They say the market as a whole is smarter than any individual investor. Therefore, it ought to be exponentially smarter than any one political pundit. That, anyway, is the theory behind the Iowa Electronic Markets, a project run by the University of Iowa's business school. Just as investors can buy futures contracts on the price of pork bellies, political junkies can risk real money on political outcomes -- such as, in the graph below, the 2004 Democratic nomination.
In past elections, political futures markets have outperformed public opinion polls as predictors better than half the time. It looks like the market's crystal ball is still working. By late October, when a Washington Post/ABC News poll found Howard Dean leading Joseph Lieberman, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, and Dick Gephardt by only three or four points each, Dean had already emerged as the market's clear favorite. Maybe Al Gore picked up a few easy bucks before making his endorsement?
Graph: 2004 Democratic National Convention Nomination Market - not available online
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
rgtr