Lott Update
Much has happened in the John Lott affair since I last posted about it here. The most important development: Someone has come forward to say he took part in the survey Lott says he conducted in 1997 -- not as one of the questioners, but as one of the respondents. James Lindgren, one of the primary sleuths in the Lott case, has interviewed the person in question and believes that he is credible. "In the next week," Lindgren says, "I will write up the interview, add it to the report, and change the conclusion from an agnostic one to a more positive one."
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?