Blame Canada, Part 636
Canada's Parliament has just ratified the Kyoto Protocol on greenhouse gas reductions. Reason's Ron Bailey explains why that was a dumb move here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Economics has been described as the 'dismal science' . Today's economic hero is a 55 year old man , dying of cancer and having an expensive divorce. I see John Christy fits the bill perfectly. He seems to have omitted the cost of losing around 100,000 square miles of the USA bordering the sea.
A 7% reduction is well within reach for the USA without much effort. Most plant emitting greenhouse gases will require replacement by then anyway. Replacing it with more efficient equipment isn't hard. Even us Europeans manage.
Did anybody notice the cost of phasing out CFC's in the USA? No, I thought not. Snort.