Seed Case
Drop that pretzel. The Drug Enforcement Administration has given manufacturers of hemp foods until March 18 to "dispose" of their products--but not by eating them. Even during this "grace period," the DEA warns, "no person may use any THC-containing 'hemp' product for human consumption." The original deadline for the ban, announced last October, was February 6. The DEA extended it to give the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit time to consider a challenge by the Hemp Industries Association.
The DEA claims it is merely clarifying existing law. It says products containing trace amounts of THC have been illegal for three decades; it's just that no one (including the Justice Department) realized it until last fall. The industry argues that the DEA is trying to evade the procedures required for adding substances to Schedule I, the most restrictive category of the Controlled Substances Act. Among other things, the DEA would have to show that products such as Nutiva Hemp Chips and Ruth's Balsamic Hemp salad dressing have a "high potential for abuse."
Meanwhile, hemp food companies are seeking to allay concerns that their products can trigger positive results on drug tests. Although early reports indicated this was possible, subsequent research has shown that currently available products do not contain enough THC to interfere with properly conducted urinalysis. Companies participating in the TestPledge program promise to keep it that way.
Even if the test concerns were valid, the DEA's attempt to remove hemp seed and oil from the food supply would be hard to fathom. As hempsters are fond of noting, poppy seeds contain traces of opiates, but the DEA has never tried to seize bagels or pastries as contraband.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?