By the Boards

As part of a deal resolving lawsuits by 46 states, tobacco giants like the Marlboro Man have vanished from our streets and highways.
Will smoking decrease as a result? No study has ever demonstrated that advertising makes people more likely to smoke. But tobacco's opponents have long insisted that smoking would not be nearly as popular were it not for all those images of macho men and sexy women with cigarettes.
Lately, however, these critics don't sound so certain. Minnesota Attorney General Hubert H. Humphrey III made sure that ad restrictions were part of his state's settlement with the tobacco companies. Yet after last fall's announcement of the 46-state deal--which also bans cartoon characters, promotional items, and product placement in movies--he was suddenly skeptical. "Judging from the experience of those countries where all advertising is banned but teen-agers still light up in droves," Humphrey wrote in The New York Times, "limits on advertising may not make much difference." Now he tells us.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
xtedfghf