Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Working Women, Give Up

Brian Doherty | From the July 1997 issue

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The tax code can be seen as "pro-family" in at least one respect: It makes going to work for married women actually cost their families money under some circumstances. That's one conclusion of Taxing Women, a new book by University of Southern California economist Edward J. McCaffery.

For a hypothetical woman whose husband made $15,000 a year, McCaffery found that her taking a full-time job paying $5.00 an hour could actually decrease the couple's overall compensation by $1,450. After she pays her income tax in her husband's tax bracket, Social Security taxes, state and local taxes, and typical child care and work-related expenses, and loses the earned-income tax credit, she's working for less than nothing.

While conservatives might suggest that this just means the little lady should stay home as tradition intends, McCaffery argues that this perverse tax incentive means that "for poor women, being married often makes little financial sense, and unfortunately, that includes many women with children." Which means the tax code, like welfare, can be one more way the government discourages family formation among the poor.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Good news about UCSD admissions: more qualified applicants

Brian Doherty is a senior editor at Reason and author of Ron Paul's Revolution: The Man and the Movement He Inspired (Broadside Books).

PolicySocial Security
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (1)

Latest

Texas Can't Force Book Vendors To Rate Books According to Sexual Content, District Court Decides

Brian Doherty | 10.28.2025 6:15 PM

Trump's Appeal of His New York Convictions Highlights the Absurdity of Alvin Bragg's Convoluted Case

Jacob Sullum | 10.28.2025 5:50 PM

Bill Gates Admits That Climate Change 'Will Not Be the End of Civilization'

Jeff Luse | 10.28.2025 4:31 PM

Abolish Property Taxes?

Christian Britschgi | 10.28.2025 12:45 PM

'We Proudly Make Things Here': California Distillery Owner Says SCOTUS Should Dump Trump's Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 10.28.2025 11:45 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300