O.J. Simpson Trial Good for Privacy?
Despite its ill effects on race relations, media behavior, and respect for the jury system, the O.J. Simpson criminal trial had some positive effects on privacy in America, believe it or not.
In 1993-94, the wiretappinest state judge in California was none other than Simpson case star Lance Ito. Ito approved eight different taps that intercepted over 24,000 calls at a cost of over $1.3 million. These taps resulted in only 16 arrests and only three convictions. The cases all involved narcotics.
During the 1994-95 reporting period–according to Wiretap Report, published by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts–Judge Ito, busy with the Simpson case, approved not a single tap.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
fyhg