Get notifications of new releases from the Reason-Rupe Poll.

Young Libertarians Voted For Obama

It should surprise few that most young Americans are either socially liberal or fiscally liberal. Yet it is not clear that a majority is both socially and fiscally liberal. Nevertheless, even fiscally conservative millennials voted Democratic in 2012. 

According to a September 2012 poll, 59 percent of young Americans favored legalizing small amounts of marijuana for personal use, compared to 45 percent among Americans over 30. A similar percentage of millennials thought “we need a strong government to handle today’s complex economic problems” while 41 percent believe “people would be better able to handle today’s problems within a free market with less government involvement.” One might quickly conclude that nearly two-thirds of the millennial generation are liberal Democrats, at least on these issues.  However, the data reveals a more nuanced story.

Instead, only 28 percent of millennials want to both legalize pot and strengthen government. Instead, 30 percent want to legalize pot and prefer free markets to a strong central government. Another 29 percent of young Americans want a strong central government but don’t want to legalize marijuana. Another way to think of this is that 50 percent of young Americans desiring drug reform also prefer free markets, and half of millennials who prefer strong government also oppose marijuana legalization. Only nine percent preferred free markets and wanted to ban drugs, a sample size too small to deeply evaluate.

These millennial groups vary demographically. Those who gave a fiscally conservative and socially liberal response to the aforementioned questions are slightly above average income for their age cohort and have significantly higher expectations of upward income mobility than their peers. They are also far more likely to not identify with a religion and never attend church, and are the least likely to say they planned to “definitely vote” in the 2012 presidential election.

Most strikingly, a plurality (48 percent) of these fiscally conservative socially liberal millennials planned to vote for Obama, compared to 38 percent who planned to vote for Romney. However, including Gary Johnson as a potential third party candidate left Obama’s numbers fairly unchanged, but brought Romney’s numbers to 29% of these young libertarians as 17 percent said they’d vote for Gary Johnson.

Not surprisingly, 73 percent of liberal millennials said they planned to vote for Obama, as did 58 percent of millennials who prefer a strong government but want to keep pot banned. Thus, young libertarians were less likely to vote for Obama than their peers, but still a clear plurality intended to do so.

Liberal millennials differed from their peers in that they are significantly less likely to expect income mobility for themselves, but had about average income compared to other millennials. In fact, even though communitarian-leaning millennials had significantly lower income they had higher income mobility prospects than liberal millennials.

Obama’s capturing of young fiscal conservatives explains in part how Obama obtained 60 percent of the millennial vote on Election Day. Young Americans opted for Obama over Romney by 23 points. Obama’s success among America’s millennial generation is not entirely due to its liberal constituency, but also its growing libertarian counterpart.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • MissMalevolent||

    Hmm, it doesn't make sense. Just sounds like the usual cult of personality voting.

    "This guy is way cooler than the other guy"

    *eyeroll*

  • John Galt||

    Today's children were breast-feed celebrity worship.

  • deffmike||

    So that's what those folks who want bigger goverment AND want keep the ban are called - communitarians? I didnt think that there was even a term for these a-holes. Lovely. Well anyway, learned something new.

  • gaoxiaen||

    They were probably voting against Romney, not for Obama. I would have voted for Stalin before I'd have voted for Romney if they were the only choices. My Republican registration is changing to Libertarian when I renew my driver's license.

  • Liberty||

    Any particular reason or thats just what everyone else at your college thinks?

  • Liberty||

    Why did these people vote for Obama? Because of who they are. They want sexual libertinism, and Obama represents that. They don't want to pay taxes or fight wars and they want to be able to smoke pot. But they also want religion destroyed, anyone who didn't like free sex cursed. Gode, at, this board, justified his Obama vote because of gay marriage. It wasnt because he felt that ' the gummimt shouldn't be involved.' It is because he wants gays to be 'accepted by society.' I am a cultural conservative. Individual responsibility doesnt end at the bedroom.

  • thistle||

    "They want sexual libertinism, and Obama represents that."

    Obama represents that? That is some creepy psycho-sexual projection mister.

    I suggest a more robust cilice to hold in all that repression.

  • MFMars||

    The last election is done. Everyone is trying to explain why people voted for Obama or Romney. I believe the real issue is how do we get the young voters that lean libertarian to see that there is a party they can vote for rather than A or B. If nothing else, to quote the movie "Brewsters Millions", vote "none of the above"

  • sohbet||

    very bloogs super adm'ns

  • sohbet||

    super blogs thanks admins
    sohbet
    sohbet odaları

  • cinsel sohbet||

    Thanks you very good nice comments admin yes o tad cinsel chat
    chat sohbet

advertisement