Court Documents Reveal Details of LAPD Incident with Photographer

Shawn Nee, a street and documentary photographer in Hollywood, California, is alleging in a lawsuit filed in late 2013 that officers from the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) retaliated against him for asserting his constitutional right to take photographs in a public space. Nee was taking photos from a sidewalk approximately 90 feet away from an incident officers were investigating June 2, 2013. Even so, he was detained, cuffed and had his information run by LAPD Officers Mike Foster and Kevin Palmer.

When the officers' supervisor, Sergeant Rudy Vidal, arrived at the location, Foster allegedly told Vidal that Nee was "talking all this nonsense" about his First Amendment rights. After Nee further asserted that he was being detained for taking photos in a public space and invoked his right to remain silent, Vidal ordered Palmer and Foster to take Nee into custody for "interfering." From the lawsuit:

At the Wilcox station, Nee was handcuffed to a bench until he was taken into an interrogation room and questioned by a detective. Nee was in custody for approximately one and one-half hours before he was released with no charges filed. Throughout most of that time, he was handcuffed.

The LAPD said in two responses to the lawsuit filed in Feburary 2014 that the force used against Nee "was caused and necessitated" by his actions, and, "was reasonable and necessary for self defense." Further, the court papers say there was reasonable suspicision to detain Nee and probable cause for his arrest.

Although the LAPD is clear in its policy about the rights of news reporters at crime scenes, saying officers should not prevent the taking of pictures in public spaces (including pictures of police officers), the policy is not clear about the rights of citizen or independent journalists like Nee. The lawsuit says that the fact that the current LAPD policy fails to recognize that the rights of credentialed journalists are no greater than citizens, "encourages the police to mistreat independent journalists and members of the public they encounter."

The incident was caught by Nee on a Vievu body camera, the same camera police officers internationally use in the field so there is a recording after the fact. The practice can protect an officer in a court preceding or if there is an internal affairs investigation. Reason TV initally aired video of Nee's arrest in "Cameras vs. LAPD: Was a Photographer Interfering or Just Taking Pictures."

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Ted S.||

    When the officers' supervisor, Sergeant Rudy Vidal, arrived at the location, Foster allegedly told Vidal that Nee was "talking all this nonsense" about his First Amendment rights.

    The only right you have is Fuck You, That's Why

  • gimmeasammich||

    Sergeant Rudy Vidal

    "And the pudding pop, Jell-o snacks, Rudy!"

    -Bill Cosby

  • sloopyinca||

    I'd say Rudy is like school in the summertime...no class!

  • Dave Krueger||

    Because they can.

  • creech||

    Can we all become "credentialed journalists" for Hit & Run or Reason? Or do police departments only recognize traditional newspapers and
    tv and radio news reporters?

  • woodNfish||

    These cops should be charged with conspiracy to violate Nee's constitutional rights. I think 15 years in prison is about the right sentence. It should be even more harsh than usual because these thug cops are supposed to uphold the law.

    Oh, and while they are in prison they should be thoroughly ass-raped everyday, just because cops suck.

  • R C Dean||

    the policy is not clear about the rights of citizen or independent journalists like Nee

    IOW, the policy is garbage and unconstitutional.

  • jimpeel||

    The only ones doing any interfering were the police who had to go out of their way to interfere with his civil rights.

    This is what you get with the militarization of the police and their "us vs. them" mentality. Courts are finding against the police for these types of actions in state after state. The police now try to say that they are afraid that the camera is a gun so they need to take it for officer safety. Go figure.

    Remember, when the SHTF these are the people you will be dealing with.

  • ghada2013||

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement