Domestic Spying Requires a New Probe, Say Former Church Committee Members

Sen. Frank ChurchU.S. CongressWhen America's spooks got out of hand with sock drawer rummaging at home and whacking foreign dignitaries overseas in the 1970s, the U.S. Senate set up a committee under Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) to investigate the shenanigans. In the course of the probe, Sen. Church warned: "If this government ever became a tyrant, if a dictator ever took charge in this country, the technological capacity that the intelligence community has given the government could enable it to impose total tyranny, and there would be no way to fight back." He and fellow committee members recommended reforms for reining the spy agencies in. Now that the country's spooks are back to sticking their noses into Americans' private business, former members of the Church Committee want Congress to launch a new investigation, with renewed limits on the snoops.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation published a letter from the counsel, advisers, and staff members of the Church Committee, which remarks in reference to their original effort:

In 1975, the public learned that the National Security Agency (NSA) had been collecting and analyzing international telegrams of American citizens since the 1940s under secret agreements with all the major telegram companies. Years later, the NSA instituted another "Watch List" program to intercept the international communications of key figures in the civil rights and anti-Vietnam War movements among other prominent citizens. Innocent Americans were targeted by their government...

Our findings were startling. Broadly speaking, we determined that sweeping domestic surveillance programs, conducted under the guise of foreign intelligence collection, had repeatedly undermined the privacy rights of US citizens. A number of reforms were implemented as a result, including the creation of permanent intelligence oversight committees in Congress and the passage of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

Now, in the wake of Edward Snowden's revelations:

The scale of domestic communications surveillance the NSA engages in today dwarfs the programs revealed by the Church Committee...As former members and staff of the Church Committee we can authoritatively say: the erosion of public trust currently facing our intelligence community is not novel, nor is its solution. A Church Committee for the 21st Century—a special congressional investigatory committee that undertakes a significant and public reexamination of intelligence community practices that affect the rights of Americansand the laws governing those actions—is urgently needed. Nothing less than the confidence of the American public in our intelligence agencies and, indeed, the federal government, is at stake.

Unfortunately, but perhaps inevitably, some of the reforms implemented by the original Church Committee were turned back on themselves once the committee went away and the snoops went back to work. Modified by the security state, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act passed to rein spies in during the 1970s now serves as an enabler to them. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that law created as an oversight body has become little more than a rubber stamp.

Which doesn't mean that Congress shouldn't follow up on the letter and make an effort to investigate and once again rein in the NSA and company. But we shouldn't assume that this will be any more permanent a fix than the last effort, or that we'll do more than buy ourselves a little time until new reforms are subverted.

Reformist committees come and go, but the eavesdropping bureaucracy seems to live on, always posing a danger to the people it supposedly protects.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Almanian!||

    The scale of domestic communications surveillance the NSA engages in today dwarfs the programs revealed by the Church Committee...

    But Snowden's a traitor and should be hung from the nearest oak tree, and we live under the freedoms supplied by the NSA!!

    Did they order the Code Red?!!! YOU'RE GODDMANED RIGHT THEY DID!!!

    Fuck me.

  • Paul.||

    This is why the NSA demanded a separation of Church and State.

  • ||

    the eavesdropping bureaucracy seems to live on, always posing a danger to the people it supposedly protects

    Because this is what governments do. It is an inevitable and "logical" outcome; governments thrive on power, and knowledge is power. The more knowledge, the more power.

    This isn't going away, ever. Welcome to government.

  • wareagle||

    those with money and/or power, and one frequently begets the other, always want more of each.

  • ||

    The thing is, I think people don't realize how endemic this is because they look at governments in the past that didn't do this (or not nearly as much) and think "not every government does this".

    Yes they do. I guarantee you that had this power been available to any government throughout human history, it would have used it in exactly the same way. It's just that such power was previously unthinkable. As soon as it became possible, what happened? This.

  • Ivan Pike Trolle||

    Until people demand their rights be respected, things like this will continue to happen. How do you convince people to stand up for their rights?

  • Paul.||

    How do you convince people to stand up for their rights?

    Good question. Taking them away doesn't seem to do it...

  • Paul.||

    Look what happened to the Romans when they stopped eavesdropping.

  • RishJoMo||

    Dude seems to know which way he is going. Wow.

    www.Anon-VPN.com

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement