How Disconcerted Should We Feel About an Intel Chief Who Doesn’t Grasp Human Behavior?

Maybe hackers aren't the ones who need to get out of the basement.Office of the Director of National IntelligenceEli Lake has a new piece up at the Daily Beast about Director of Intelligence James Clapper, and it absolutely, positively will not ease anybody’s mind that Clapper has a mental grasp at all why people are upset at the scope of National Security Agency (NSA) data collection.  The man still, after all this public outrage over the NSA’s behavior, does not understand why Edward Snowden is leaking information:

And maybe the worst part for Clapper is, he still doesn’t get why Snowden did it. Clapper sees himself as the man who’s opened up the intelligence community to public scrutiny, who keeps the Constitution on his wall, and who’s endured the endless congressional grillings—all while keeping Americans safe. How could Snowden, a fellow intelligence analyst and contractor, not see that? “Maybe if I had I’d understand him better because I have trouble understanding what he did or what he’d do,” the director said. “From my standpoint, the damage he’s done. I could almost accept it or understand it if this were simply about his concerns about so-called domestic surveillance programs. But what he did, what he took, what he has exposed, goes way, way, way beyond the so-called domestic surveillance programs.” 

At The Atlantic, Conor Friedersdorf looks at that paragraph, along with Clapper’s acknowledgment that he can’t guarantee there won’t be future leaks, and asks the important question: Why should we trust the NSA with our information, then?

The NSA has collected information about the communications of millions of Americans. Nefarious actors, given access to metadata from the phone dragnet alone, could blackmail countless citizens and quietly manipulate the political process. The NSA doesn't deny that. They just insist that they're not nefarious actors, that safeguards are in place, and that we should trust them as stewards of this data. 

Well, here is Clapper telling the truth: Despite regarding Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden as having done grave damage to the United States with their data thefts, he can't guarantee the same thing won't happen again. And if a future whistleblower could gain access to the most sensitive data, so could a blackmailer.

So could a foreign spy.  

Though discussion of potential damage of data theft from the NSA tends to drift over into blacks ops, it doesn’t have to be so sexy to be something we need to concern ourselves about. In fact, I think that argument we need to fear of information falling into the hands of enemy spies or political opportunists tends to feed the government’s line of defense. When the NSA or President Barack Obama condescendingly declares they aren’t listening to our calls or reading our e-mails, what they mean is that we don’t have any information they’d find interesting anyway and we’re all just being paranoid. Yes, there are plenty of examples of federal surveillance tools being used against Americans for political purposes, but it is probably true that most Americans will never be subject to such abuses.

However, the more likely fear should not be a foreign spy or a political opportunist, but for things like identity theft or more conventional, less-cloak-and-dagger-oriented crimes. We’ve seen police officers abuse databases to get access to information to file false tax returns. The more information about us more people have access to, especially without our knowledge or control, the more risks we face of any number of abuses.

Friedersdorf also notes that Snowden’s position about NSA surveillance is obviously not an outlier, making Clapper’s bafflement at Snowden rather baffling itself:

It isn't as if no one else has felt this alarm. Snowden's revelations alarmed masses in multiple countries, including heads of state, legislators in both American political parties, professionals at some of the world's leading IT companies. Clapper can't even imagine what might've inspired Snowden? The answer is everywhere. Maybe he should get outside the SIGINT bubble. 

Nick Gillespie analyzed Lake’s last piece on Clapper, where he seems to think (probably incorrectly) that Americans would have been fine with mass domestic surveillance collection had they been told, here.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    DOUBLE POST!

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    So could a foreign spy.

    Um, a foreign spy did. Don't you know? That's why Snowden ended up in Russia. IT'S NOT A COINCIDENCE.

  • SIV||

    At The Atlantic, Conor Friedersdorf

    No

  • SIV||

    Despite regarding Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden as having done grave damage to the United States with their data thefts

    She was some guy named Bradley Manning when the data was stolen and leaked.That was before the operation name change.

  • SusanM||

    Not this shit again, please. I think Reason is trying to shake the notion that libertarians are just apologists for ignorance and knee-jerk bigotry.

    Does the world have to stop when you can't understand something or someone in it? Do you see feel no cognitive dissonance when you're demanding freedom for yourself one moment and then demanding the world conform to your understanding and expectations the next?

  • Sinclair||

    Well said.

  • LynchPin1477||

    However belatedly and reluctantly, he has moved in the last eight months to push the intelligence community to acknowledge many of the activities it has kept from the public since 9/11. Since the Snowden disclosures (and a court order last summer in favor of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought by civil liberties groups about domestic surveillance), Clapper has declassified scores of documents related to some of the most sensitive programs he would have once done everything to keep secret.

    See, you guys are being mean. He is belatedly and reluctantly doing what the courts are legally requiring him to do. What a swell guy!

  • AlmightyJB||

    "Doesn't understand human behavior"

    Just like all statists. From communist to prohibitionist.

  • Rich||

    who keeps the Constitution on his wall,

    and screams "Up against the wall, motherfucker!"

  • EDG reppin' LBC||

    I am officially done with the internet today. You won it all. There's nothing left. Thanks!

  • The Late P Brooks||

    Let me get this straight; Clapper is the perfect man for the job.

  • AmericanPrivacy||

    As increasing infringements on our Email and online privacy rises, we see great demand for a solution. The threats against your personal Internet privacy is increasing everyday as "free" Email providers, hackers, NSA's PRISM program, and the amended US Patriot Act are just a few of a growing list that are compromising our freedoms. As we stand at a crossroads, it may appear hopeless to protect our God given rights to privacy but rest assured, there are real solutions to this serious problem!

    www.americansrighttoprivacy.com offers 100% guaranteed online privacy because our servers are located in Switzerland, a safehaven for secure digital communications. As a law abiding citizen, you can be sure your digital data is safe from any agency, business, or anyone at all wanting to retrieve your information. Access to your online data communications by any authority requires an official warrant issued by a federal judge of Switzerland while most countries surrender your data without consent.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Progressive Puritans: From e-cigs to sex classifieds, the once transgressive left wants to criminalize fun.
  • Port Authoritarians: Chris Christie’s Bridgegate scandal
  • The Menace of Secret Government: Obama’s proposed intelligence reforms don’t safeguard civil liberties

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement