Top Illinois legislators said today they’ve reached agreement on a plan to deal with the state’s worst-in-the-nation unfunded public pension liability and expect to vote on it next week.
Details of the measure were unclear today and its prospects of passing remained uncertain. But both Democratic and Republican leaders said they agreed on a proposal, the first such sign of progress in more than two years of discussions spurred by a continued downgrading of the state’s credit rating.
The debate has centered on how to reduce costs while balancing the legal protections to public employee retiree benefits laid out in the state constitution. The public employee unions have repeatedly threatened to challenge in court any pension proposal that lacked their support, and they were quick to criticize today's announcement.
Though the Tribune doesn’t have full access of the deal’s contents, here’s what they were told:
[Senate Republican leader Christine] Radogno said the proposal would save about $160 billion and the goal is to fully fund the pension system over the next 30 years.
The proposal would raise retirement ages, create an optional 401(k)-styled plan and scale back the cost-of-living increases.
Increasing the retirement age, now set at various levels based on the type of work, would impact the youngest workers the most. Younger workers could see up to five years added to their retirement ages, Radogno said.
The cost-of-living adjustments would be altered “to be sure that the lower-paid, longest-serving employees have the biggest protection,” said Radogno. It would be largely patterned after a provision she pushed and was included in a bill that Speaker Michael Madigan passed in the House.
Union officials, despite not knowing what’s in the full plan yet, put out a statement that the proposal was unfair and unconstitutional. Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn supports the plan.
There will be a special one-day session on Dec. 3 to vote on the proposal. The Tribune notes that the date of the vote comes the day after the filing deadline for the March 2014 primary. Suggested, but not stated outright: Democrats will know if they’re going to face union-funded primary challengers before they vote.