San Antonio Cop Charged With Handcuffing, Raping Teenage Girl He Pulled Over, Had Faced Similar Accusation Before

cop accused of rapeSAPDAnother cop whose alleged actions and history of misconduct make the case for zero tolerance for police officers.  Officer Jackie Len Neal of the San Antonio Police Department was arrested for allegedly raping a 19-year-old woman he pulled over at 2 in the morning. Neal allegedly told the woman her car was reported stole (she produced a sales slip), ordered her to get out of the car, and patted her down despite her request for a female officer. He allegedly then handcuffed her, placed her in the back of his patrol car and raped her. Neal will continue to be paid until he is indicted, and was released on $20,000 bond. The police department should have the power to dismiss him immediately as they see fit; even the perception of impropriety or criminality can make an officer unfit for service. What’s more, Neal had been the subject of sexual assault complaints before. Via My San Antonio:

Police Chief William McManus said a different woman made a similar complaint against Neal a few years ago. The date of that incident was not immediately available.

McManus said that woman later refused to cooperate in a police investigation, so it wasn't pursued. There were no consequences for Neal at the time.

McManus said he has asked officers to go back to that woman to see if she would be willing to help in the new investigation.

Neal was suspended in September for three days for dating an 18-year-old member of the Police Explorer program about two years ago. The program is meant to encourage young people to consider a career in law enforcement.

Officers are forbidden from fraternizing with members of the program for people 14 to 21 years old.

The San Antonio Police Department should not have been hampered by a union contract from dismissing Neal after the initial rape complaint or after the clear violation of policy with regards to the youth program.

The SAPD should be commended for moving to act quickly on the latest complaint, and for their attempt to revisit the prior allegation. It doesn’t always happen that way, with prosecutions of cops being both notoriously rare and late. In Kentucky, for example, it took nineteen years and a seven-year-long state police investigation to get to this week’s arrest of two former Oak Grove cops for the 1994 murder of two local prostitutes whose madam publicly accused corrupt cops of the killings. Oak Grove’s mayor called the charges the “tip of the iceberg,” pointing out that other police officers may well have known what happened.

And just today, the schools superintendent in Steubenville, Ohio was charged with obstructing an investigation into the rape of a teenage girl by three high school football players, a rape that would’ve likely remained uninvestigated were it not for the attention given to it by online activists and local bloggers, one of whom may face more prison time than the alleged rapists he exposed,  and another who successfully fought off defamation charges related to her coverage of the case. Reason TV interviewed her attorney earlier this year, which you can watch below:

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • pan fried wylie||

    Besides a well prepared car thief, who else can produce a sales slip on demand?

    Yeah, that's what I thought bitch, now, down on your knees.

  • Bo Cara Esq.||

    -The San Antonio Police Department should not have been hampered by a union contract from dismissing Neal after the initial rape complaint or after the clear violation of policy with regards to the youth program.

    Was there such a contract here? I did not see any reference to it in the link.

  • happel||

    It is pretty safe to assume every large metropolitan city has union contracted officers. No, there was not reference to it, but it was natural to make this assumption. A city of 1.2 million people is likely to have unionized police officers.

  • Ted S.||

    The San Antonio Police Department should not have been hampered by a union contract from dismissing Neal after the initial rape complaint or after the clear violation of policy with regards to the youth program.

    I'm sure the state would find a way around similar clauses in private-sector contracts.

  • ||

    ordered her to get out of the car, and patted her down despite her request for a female officer. He allegedly then handcuffed her, placed her in the back of her patrol car and raped her.

    Aside from 30 years behind bars, can anyone think of a suitable and public punishment for this pig?

  • kinnath||

    Life in the general population should be do the trick.

  • ||

    ^^This. Not to condone rape behind bars, but I can't think of a more suitable reason for allowing it to continue.

  • anon||

    This. Not to condone rape behind bars

    I think it's only right and just for him to experience the same emotions his victim did.

  • ||

    Yeah, same here.

  • Bill Dalasio||

    Naked. With a tattoo on his rear end that says "RAPIST LEO".

  • anon||

    Aside from 30 years behind bars, can anyone think of a suitable and public punishment for this pig?

    Public hanging.

    Fuck, I'd drive to Texas to see that.

  • Heroic Mulatto||

    Aside from 30 years behind bars, can anyone think of a suitable and public punishment for this pig?


    Slow slicing

  • ||

    Stop that!

  • Plopper||

    Because obviously slow slicing, or even murder is an appropriate punishment for rape.

    Just saying something because this isn't the first time you've posted this in response to some rape thing.

    I'd much rather be raped than killed, not that I'd want either, but the point is they are in no way proportional to each other.

    An eye for an eye, not a head for a foot.

  • Heroic Mulatto||

    That was a way too serious response to something that is basically a long-running joke/meme.

  • Plopper||

    I get that, but it stopped being funny a long time ago. It wasn't even funny the first time.

  • Plopper||

    (inb4 I'm accused of being a rapist)

  • Heroic Mulatto||

    Go fuck yourself. There was no reason to start shit, except to feed your own sense of self-righteousness.

    You should listen to what my wife, a survivor of a brutal sexual assault, by the way, has to say on the topic of appropriate punishment. If I offended your delicate sensibilities, you'd probably be curled up in the fetal position after hearing what she has to say.

    Asshole.

  • Plopper||

  • ||

    ^^^ This.

    HM, we need to get together for drinks.

  • Irish||

    What's it like to live in a world where hyperbole doesn't exist?

  • Warty||

    Boring. Possibly even more boring than this jerkoff. No, wait, no, my mistake. That's not possible.

  • Plopper||

  • Plopper||

    It's just it reeks of a certain kind of righteous indignation that rubs me the wrong way.

    And after the 999999999999th time I felt like saying something.

  • Heroic Mulatto||

    Why don't you post under your usual handle?

  • Plopper||

    What is my usual handle?

  • Heroic Mulatto||

    I dunno, but you stated before that this was not your usual handle, but that one you chose because you felt you wanted to say something that was "controversial" or something.

  • Irish||

    No, I think this is his only handle. He just said something weird one time about choosing it because it sounded like poo and he knew that's how people here would treat him.

    Or something.

  • Redmanfms||

    No, I think this is his only handle. He just said something weird one time about choosing it because it sounded like poo and he knew that's how people here would treat him.

    His other handle is Otherhmmmm. Tulpa, in a rare bout of usefulness outed him and Plopper/Otherhmmmm went fucking ballistic.

    He used to only pop up in the pedo threads.

  • Irish||

    Holy fuck, can I get a link? That's hilarious.

  • Redmanfms||

    The handle is actually Otherhmm, but I can't actually find the thread where Tulpa and he go at it.

    Sorry.

  • Plopper||

    I was upset because Tulpa went on about a bunch of personal attacks. I've never had an issue with admitting I've posted as otherhmm.

    I originally also posted as just "hmm", but then I realized someone else posted as that so I switched to "otherhmm".

    When they started requiring registration I started using "Plopper".

    I've also posted as "VG Zhitphayce".

    As for "only posting on 'pedo' threads", a google search for comments by otherhmm or plopper should prove that otherwise.

    But it's interesting it's always a bunch of personal attacks and indirect accusations of me being a pedo.

    "Outing me" for what? Having an opinion that might not jive with the more conservatarian crowd?

  • Plopper||

    Btw Irish, it was that thread that me, you and HM went at it.

    I had assumed you had already seen it, but I guess you had stopped paying attention to the thread by the time Tulpa showed up.

    I've been trying to find the thread myself but I can't find it now.

    I'd gladly post it as I firmly stand by my opinion stated there and also the other thread referenced by Tulpa I posted on as "Otherhmm".

  • Redmanfms||

    Dude, I don't care about you or your bullshit.

    I was simply setting Irish straight on your use of other screen names.

  • Plopper||

    Seemed like there was more to it than that.

  • Irish||

    Attacking a rapist reeks of righteous indignation?

  • Plopper||

    No, it's really more of a general thing from HM.

    But yeah, when you post over the top punishments for anything sexual related it does start to reek of righteous indignation.

  • Heroic Mulatto||

    No, you're just concern trolling.

  • Plopper||

    And it's so easy to dismiss a valid point with declaring the person making the point is "concern trolling".

  • Heroic Mulatto||

    There is nothing valid in your "point" and furthermore, no one was speaking directly to you. You decided to jump in and start shit.

    The fact that your response to the actual sexual assault of my wife was to post a picture of feces, as opposed to a "I'm sorry to hear that", speaks volumes as to your lack of character.

  • Plopper||

    It came across to me as a troll, if you weren't trolling I'm sorry.

    I'm sorry to hear that about your wife.

  • VG Zaytsev||

    I'm guessing that Plopper was accused of statutory rape at some point - maybe for fucking a 17yo girl friend when he was 18 or something like that. He's way too defensive wrt to general comments about kill rapists and he went off on me one time when I said that it sounded like he was defending pedophiles.

  • Invisible Finger||

    I'm in favor of an eye for an eye.

    Except when the perp is a government employee. Only then is the death penalty OK. After all, they're the ones who tell us it's supposed to be a deterrent.

  • SugarFree||

    Maybe you haters should learn to examine the totality of circumstance. Maybe Brother Neal was forced to rape that teenager to save her from a life of not being a rape victim. Maybe her vagina made a furtive movement. Let the process do its work and then make your ignorant judgments.

    Smooches, non-surf-lifting-Fairchild-banging bigorati.

  • Irish||

    Too many capital letters.

  • SugarFree||

    good point ITNNJRQE

  • Being Waterboarded||

    Maybe she was clenching her vagina, which would be reasonable suspicion of hidden drugs. Neal just probed her vagina with his, uh, instrument to check for concealed drugs.

  • Almanian!||

    so in other words it was a good hit IMHO

  • DEATFBIRSECIA||

    Officer Penile Safety

  • ||

    Appropriate (I'm sorry heterotarians)

  • anon||

    If only she were wearing a Rape-X.

    I wonder how the judge would justify letting him off free if he had to have one of those surgically removed after raping that poor girl.

  • Dweebston||

    It may be the one case of self defense against an officer that goes unpunished by immediate execution-by-cop.

  • Alice Bowie||

    He's be on paid vacation while his trial drags on for years and years.
    He will waive his right to a trial by jury.
    A Judge (which is effectively another cop) will find him NOT GUILTY.

  • kinnath||

    There are days when I think it was a mistake to ban cruel and unusual punishments.

  • Alice Bowie||

    They should just bring back the CROSS

  • Francisco d Anconia||

    It was good enough for Jesus.

  • Almanian!||

    ALLEGEDLY raping. ALLEGEDLY.

    But the people who protect you every day from the knockout gamers and father rapers don't have the same rights as you civilians, right? Nice.

    They deserve to know they can go home to their families every night. But POS civilians like you try them and hang them in the public square as a lesson to the others.

    Cops maintain a higher standard and are held to a higher standard than the civilian population. When this fine peace officer is found not guilty and returns to duty protecting you, maybe you'll find the common decency to say, "Thank you."

    But probably not. Typical POS.

    /returns to surfing while lifting Morgan Fairchild

  • SweatingGin||

    AND NOTHING ELSE HAPPENED.

  • anon||

    ^^ This is what Dunphy actually believes.

  • ||

    Needs more bigorati

  • Brett L||

    They get extra rights in my state.

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    What would happen to this woman, legally, if she had fought back and hurt or killed her attacker? We are to unquestioningly comply with commands from law enforcement.

  • Hugh Akston||

    He'd be on paid vacation for shooting a prone civilian in the back of his squad car. A thorough investigation would rule the shooting justified, but a severe reprimand would be placed in his file for potentially damaging police property.

  • anon||

    I find it sad that I read your comment and thought "Actually, that's pretty likely."

  • SIV||

    Sessions was backed up by Jan Ting, a law professor at Temple University, who told the conference that the current high-immigration, low-wage economy is “Blade Runner with food stamps.”

    “Blade Runner” is a 1982 science-fiction movie in which most Americans are jobless and trapped in a violent, poverty-stricken nation.

    The Daily Caller summarizes Blade Runner

  • anon||

    The bill has been blocked by top GOP leaders in the House, who are trying to balance donors’ demands for more workers with voters’ demands for more jobs.

    Uh... Someone should tell them the two are not mutually exclusive.

    In fact, I'd wager open borders would decrease unemployment due to increased demand.

  • Irish||

    Plus the issue with low income workers coming to the country isn't that they 'take jobs' it's that they depress wages.

    The question is to what extent those depressed wages are offset by the lower cost of living caused by cheaper goods.

  • Dweebston||

    I'd take a 50% wage cut if my COL fell by 55%. It would be the biggest pay raise I've received in years.

  • Heroic Mulatto||

    And that would be the correct answer to deflation; however, we have found that homo economicus is actually stark raving mad.

  • Heroic Mulatto||

    And that would be the correct answer to deflation; however, we have found that homo economicus is actually stark raving mad.

  • ||

    But what's the correct answer to comment inflation?

  • AdamJ||

    That only works if you are free of debt. In the system our top men have created, we must borrow money to prosper and the assets must continue increasing in value to prevent their game from exploding.

  • VG Zaytsev||

    The question is to what extent those depressed wages are offset by the lower cost of living caused by cheaper goods.

    The real question is for whom?

    Obviously many people will benefit from lower wages and a few will suffer greatly from the same.

  • Dweebston||

    Sessions don't need defending. Sessions stand on their own merits.

  • SweatingGin||

    OT, and maybe it was covered earlier...

    Obama got heckled at a press conference today, with the heckler asking him to unilaterally stop deportations of illegals.

    He explained that he doesn't have that power. I'm not sure as to how he doesn't.

    He can unilaterally delay enforcement of a law, with explicit dates that it takes effect. But he can't do that with an existing law that is already in effect?

    I mean, is the criteria whether or not the effective date of the law is after today's date? or is it just FYTY?

  • anon||

    I mean, is the criteria whether or not the effective date of the law is after today's date? or is it just FYTY?

    What difference, at this point, does it make?

  • Dweebston||

    Do you recall the old canard about God contriving a rock so large even He couldn't lift it?

    Obama's the same way: His powers are illimitable unless He decides otherwise.

  • Archduke von Pantsfan||

    The health and education editor of the student newspaper at one of Canada’s most prestigious universities has advised the world that Movember — the month-long pledge by men to grow hair above the upper lip to support men’s health awareness — is “sexist, racist, transphobic, and misinformed.”

  • Rufus J. Firefly||

    Yeah saw that. The comments rip that idiot to shreds.

  • Irish||

    The best one is when the guy who actually runs the Movember organizations shows up and hands the writer his ass. That was a thing of beauty.

  • cavalier973||

    "Transphobic"? What's that?

  • anon||

    Scared of trannies. Or transportation. Pick one.

  • Pope Jimbo||

    Scared of getting on a bus full of trannies?

  • SusanM||

    It's a latent fear of Pontiac.

  • Dweebston||

    I've seen the inside of a transmission, buddy, and frankly I'd be scared to repair mine.

  • anon||

    “to secondary male characteristics, including having a prostate”

    Pretty sure having a prostate isn't a secondary male characteristic.

  • cavalier973||

    “To be completely clear, you don’t have to be a man to have a prostate, and you don’t have to have a prostate to be a man,” Haddad proclaims.

    Is that true? Let's see...

    In 2002, female paraurethral glands, or Skene's glands, were officially renamed the female prostate by the Federative International Committee on Anatomical Terminology.[4]

    Ah, I see, now.

  • anon||

    Well then the Ferative International Committe on Anatomical Terminology can suck my fucking dick, because fuck them for being cunts.

  • Eduard van Haalen||

    And it also has a bad side.

    Alternate joke - the student is at the university on work-study while doing his day job as...a LUMBERJACK!

  • cavalier973||

    It's not really mustachios. It's aliens.

  • Francisco d Anconia||

    Oh my head!

    Fuck every whiny pussy in the world!

  • cavalier973||

    I'm sure that we have some fine, upstanding officers of the law who are up to the task.

  • Archduke von Pantsfan||

    Socialism WORKS!
    HIV rates and heroin use have risen significantly [in Greece], with about half of new HIV infections being self-inflicted to enable people to receive benefits of €700 per month and faster admission on to drug-substitution programmes.

  • SweatingGin||

    I blame austerity.

  • anon||

    I knew rethuglican teahadists caused aids!

  • Dweebston||

    Uhh, please tell me their €700 in benefits is purely healthcare, and is not, in fact, €700 in discretionary income. Because €700 is about 80% my monthly income in USD, and what I'd prefer not knowing after my Monday at work is that promiscuous Greeks enjoy the majority of my income for being druggy twerps.

    Then again, €700 in healthcare is more healthcare than I've bought in a decade, so it's not very much more comforting.

  • Archduke von Pantsfan||

  • Almanian!||

    So - #Stonados is REAL! Scary.

  • ||

    The Thanksgiving episode of 'Hey Arnold!' that was about being a closeted gay man at Thanksgiving

  • ||

    My only coming out regret was that I didn't get to ruin a Thanksgiving in the most ancient traditions of my people. I ruined New Years Even instead.

  • SusanM||

    I ruined Easter dinner - twice

  • Heroic Mulatto||

    What are you? Bi?

  • Irish||

    Maybe she's gay Jesus. She ruined Easter once on the first go around and once on the Second Coming.

  • Heroic Mulatto||

    Pictured: gay Jesus

  • SusanM||

    Lol no :) My first ruination was me coming out 3 days before and the second was a few years later after I'd finally gotten around to getting a boob job about a week and a half before.

  • ||

    Coming out as a libertarian will be the worst one...

  • ||

    Why on earth would a boob job ruin Easter?

  • ||

    Because it's much more of a Christmas thing.

  • ||

    Perhaps her family is religiously conservative and Susan couldn't resist showing off the new boobs in her choice of outfit?

  • Archduke von Pantsfan||

  • Almanian!||

    "Your video will start in 30 seconds"

    tl;dl

    PWND

  • Irish||

    Woman asks: Does liking lesbian porn make me a lesbian?

    No, but it makes you marriage material.

  • ||

    Agreed.

  • ||

    Remember that woman who wrote an essay about living in poverty and why she makes stupid decisions? Turns out she's full of shit and cashing in on it

    Buried in her GoFundMe essay:

    You have to understand that the piece you read was taken out of context, that I never meant to say that all of these things were happening to me right now, or that I was still quite so abject. I am not. I am reasonably normally lower working class. I am exhausted and poor and can't make all my bills all the time but I reconciled with my parents when I got pregnant for the sake of the kids and I have family resources. I can always make the amount of money I need in a month, it's just that it doesn't always match the billing cycles.
    [...]
    When my parents came to be there for the birth and they saw what we were dealing with they moved us to Utah and gave us a trailer to live in. And then when we had our second and final daughter they helped us find a house to live in and now we have some space for once. That is the sort of person I am. I chased dreams that I couldn't afford for longer than was strictly necessary, and only gave that up when children made life suddenly more stable. But fate is a chancy thing, and I am after all perfectly suited to write about poverty. I have been privileged while poor, because I am fucked up and spent decades in therapy, because I have been given access to these words, I am well-suited to this.

  • Irish||

    I know. We figured this out like two days ago, yo. She went to a private school and had 23 instruments. She speaks like 5 languages. We figured out that she spends like 5 hours a day on Reddit, Twitter, and Jezebel...which would be kind of tough while working two jobs, raising kids, and attending college.

    I think it's hilarious that Lady Bertrum called this based entirely on the fact that she didn't think it was possible for a woman to work two jobs and be married and be as poor as she claimed.

    Apparently liberals couldn't even be asked to put that much effort into it.

  • ||

    Really? Guess I missed whatever thread this was discussed on.

    She's got a lot of nerve though, and it's amazing how someone so clearly unstable and unbalanced is being put on a pedestal by progressives as an example of how being poor is not anyone's fault. Aside from the corporations and Republicans, that is.

  • ChrisO||

    I thought this thing sounded a bit fishy when I first read it. My wife believed it, but it sounded a little too much of a parade of horribles to be totally believed.

  • Sevo||

    "That is the sort of person I am"

    Yeah, a sleazy, lying lefty.

  • Redmanfms||

    Yeah, a sleazy, lying lefty.

    And thief. She defrauded a bunch of people out of (as of two days ago) of $50,000 with her bullshit sob story.

  • ||

    So when does she run for senator?

  • Irish||

    I chased dreams that I couldn't afford for longer than was strictly necessary, and only gave that up when children made life suddenly more stable. But fate is a chancy thing, and I am after all perfectly suited to write about poverty. I have been privileged while poor, because I am fucked up and spent decades in therapy, because I have been given access to these words, I am well-suited to this.

    And this is where a culture that grants moral privileges to anyone who claims to be a victim will inevitably end up: With whiny pieces of shit with rich parents screwing up their own lives and manipulating gullible liberals into giving them money.

    What's a better sign of the fall of Western Civilization? This or the Greeks giving themselves HIV for welfare.

  • Heroic Mulatto||

    The fuck? This is basically one of those Internet "sick child with cancer" hoaxes...and she made 62,000?

  • ||

    Shit, give me $62,000 and I'd pay off my student debt, give some money to my parents, and then invest the rest into something worthwhile.

    I wouldn't go around knocking up women or blowing it on booze and gambling like so many of the noble poor.

  • seguin||

    I could buy a kickass CNC lathe for that kinda cash. Give it to me.

  • Dweebston||

    I stand by my comments: she's bilking gullible leftists, which is a treat, and this is doubly so.

  • Heroic Mulatto||

    Is it bilking though? Or is it more of a moral prostitution? She provides a "fantasy" that limousine liberal guilt is willing to pay for to experience a visceral sense of moral sanctimoniousness?

  • Dweebston||

    Moral prostitution is good. I compared it with selling indulgences, but I like yours better.

  • ||

    Fuck, I need to get in on that scam. I've got student loans to pay off.

  • ||

    "....I am fucked up and spent decades in therapy..."

    And there is the money shot!

    I wonder if she told her therapist about her sadistic impaling of roaches and displaying the corpses?

  • ||

    I should add, that if we are going to make a list of people who should not buy guns, this cunt needs to be on it.

    I wonder if anyone has checked her freezer.

  • ||

    Time opens up polling for it's Person of the Year edition. One match-up:

    Rand Paul vs. Wendy Davis

  • Irish||

    Prediction: Feminists storm the poll and Wendy Davis wins in a landslide despite the fact that 95% of the public doesn't give a fuck about her.

  • Sevo||

    Who?

  • ||

    Randall is up 65-35 according to the poll.

  • ||

    Heh, Edward Snowden trounces President Zero 80-20%.

    If the editors at Time weren't DC bootlickers they'd rightly give the award to the one man who shattered public and international confidence in government surveillance.

  • ||

    I don't understand why Shinzo Abe vs Narenda Modi is so lopsided

  • happel||

    Simple solution to this one: stick him in general population with all the other rapists. If he lives past day one, he will be the treat for all the other sick rapists in prison.

  • thorax232||

    Sadly enough, this is only typical behavior.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Progressive Puritans: From e-cigs to sex classifieds, the once transgressive left wants to criminalize fun.
  • Port Authoritarians: Chris Christie’s Bridgegate scandal
  • The Menace of Secret Government: Obama’s proposed intelligence reforms don’t safeguard civil liberties

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement