How Government Spending Harms Private Investment

Damon W. Root | March 12, 2010

Writing at Investors Business Daily, Independent Institute economist Robert Higgs argues that government intervention in the economy is strangling private sector investment:

The current investment drought does not simply reflect the housing bust that followed the residential investment boom that peaked in 2005. To be sure, real residential investment fell tremendously, by almost 53% from 2005 to 2009, with especially rapid declines the past three years. Yet real nonresidential investment also fell greatly last year, by 18% from its 2008 peak.

Even real investment in equipment and software — a category only loosely connected to the housing boom and bust — declined last year by 17% after occupying a high plateau during the preceding three years. Business firms have also fled from inventory investment, trimming their holdings by an unprecedented $125 billion in 2009 after lopping off $35 billion in 2008.

Federal government spending, meanwhile, has raced ahead. From 2007 to 2009, government purchases of newly produced final goods and services — the federal government's "contribution" to GDP — increased by over 13% in constant dollars.

Unfortunately, while private investment is the engine of economic growth, government spending (despite what generations of Keynesian economists have asserted) is the brake. To understand this negative relationship, we need only scrutinize how the federal government's spending is determined: namely, by political processes devoid of economic rationality.

In this light, we can appreciate that enhanced government spending does not bulk up the economy, nor merely crowd out worthwhile private activity. Instead, it undercuts, penalizes and distorts everything that private parties attempt to do to create wealth. Ham-fisted government regulations and additional taxes are known killers of economic growth.

Read the whole thing here. And click below to watch Higgs and Reason.tv’s Nick Gillespie discuss the decline of classical liberalism in America.

Reason needs your support. Please donate today!

Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.

|3.14.10 @ 11:08AM|#

I've been thinkin it for years. Since the 1st 'bailout'.

Yea, all this is correct, but it goes deeper. Companies aren't hiring people or expanding not just because of higher taxes and more regulation, but because...companies don't know what the hell the government is gonna do to them next month.

How the hell can you make a long term business plan when next month Congress can just decide to either tax you out of existence or just willy-nilly make yer business illegal?!?

And it's not like Congress actually bothers to tell The People what kinda bills they're passing. 'We have to pass the bill to know what's in the bill' doesn't just apply to the healthcare boondoggle.

dennis|3.12.10 @ 5:34PM|#

Higgs might be my favorite contemporary libertarian economist.

|3.13.10 @ 10:23AM|#

1 Higgs > 100,000 Krugmans.

No doubt.

The Republican Heretic|3.13.10 @ 12:06PM|#

Trackback: http://republicanheretic.wordp.....nvestment/

Paul Krugman|3.13.10 @ 10:12PM|#

NO! Don't you get it? Government CREATES JOBS! If we double government spending, we could DOUBLE THE NUMBER OF JOBS!

dennis|3.14.10 @ 4:45PM|#

Funny you should bring that up as Higgs is one of the primary theorists on the notion of "regime uncertainty,"

دردشة|6.24.11 @ 11:53PM|#

thanks

Reason.com