Iowa Reconsiders Residence Restrictions for Sex Offenders

Jacob Sullum | April 29, 2009

Last week the Iowa legislature mixed a little sanity into the state's residence restrictions for sex offenders. Under a bill the governor has indicated he will sign, the state will no longer tell "lower-risk" sex offenders, heretofore prohibited from owning or renting homes within 2,000 feet of a school or child care facility, where they may live. Instead it will let schools, child care facilities, and libraries establish "exclusion zones" where sex offenders can be nabbed for loitering. The residence restrictions will remain in place for more-serious offenders, which does not make much sense: Unlike the "exclusion zones," they do nothing to prevent potential child molesters from traveling to other neighborhoods to commit new crimes. Still, this reform counts as a move in the right direction, away from counterproductive, hysteria-driven restrictions that impede reintegration, in some cases making it almost impossible for sex offenders to find a place where they can legally live, and fail to distinguish between sex offenders who pose a real threat to children and those who don't, who nowadays include not only young men who have consensual sex with somewhat younger girlfriends but teenagers who transmit nude pictures of themselves on their cell phones. It's also encouraging that the legal changes had strong support from Iowa police and prosecutors, who for years have been complaining that the residence restrictions made their jobs harder.

I mentioned those complaints in two columns about residence restrictions, here and here.

[Thanks to Mark Lambert for the tip.]

Comments

iowafails|4.29.09 @ 4:34PM|#

First fags get to marry, now the perverts can run free. What is wrong with Iowa.

Charles Fuchs|4.29.09 @ 4:37PM|#

I agree. but it is only a very small step in the right direction.

Guess My Bra Size|4.29.09 @ 4:48PM|#

"First fags get to marry, now the perverts can run free. What is wrong with Iowa."

Funny, but I was going to post the same thing except I think you just might be serious.

|4.29.09 @ 6:04PM|#

A small step in the right direction.

michael jordan shoes|4.29.09 @ 11:39PM|#

Few human influenza virus infection in pigs. But in recent years also found a number of human cases of swine flu infection, most of them with direct contact with sick pigs have been people.

|4.30.09 @ 8:30AM|#

Actually this is a step in the direction this needs to go. The laws that are supposed to be there for the worst of the worst have been put on eveyone for anything. Some of you make yourself sound really dumb with your comments. Do some research about the subject you speak. Or just don't comment at all. You won't sound so back woods.

Invisible Finger|4.30.09 @ 6:43PM|#

How about "1 million square feet?" The exclusion zone should be the school property and that's it.

This is just one step closer to school administrators making law. The cure is worse than the disease.