Jesse Walker | May 19, 2008
The filmmakers behind Secondhand (Pepe) discuss Haiti's trade in used clothes. An excerpt:
First off, we should note that you can find pepe for sale on pretty much any street in Haiti. It seemed as though pepe lined the sidewalks with small-time vendors selling a few things by hanging them up on the walls by the sidewalk. Then we also visited all types of dedicated marketplaces. Some were very concentrated with just clothing, and these were often by the ports, where the clothing would arrive. Sometimes the pepe would be sold within larger markets where you could also find food and other goods. Sometimes the clothing was sorted into different areas or by peddler’s specialty -- you would have the used shoe guy over here and the lady that only sold t-shirts over there.
In one of the largest markets in Miragoane, just outside of the gates of the port, in the central town square -- you had people opening up boxes and making preliminary sortings. In the Saline marketplace in Port-au-Prince, there was an incredible expanse of peddler/tailors set up with sewing machines, sitting among mounds of clothing, under tents sewn together from fabric scraps and old blankets.
At times, we learn, Haitians have even used these clothes as an informal private currency, similar to the cigarettes described in R.A. Radford's classic "The Economic Organization of a P.O.W. Camp." The whole interview is here.
Elsewhere in Reason: Kerry Howley describes the used T-shirt trade in Tanzania.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I remember reading (I think it was DeSoto's The Mystery of
Capital) that it takes fourteen years to transfer real property in
Haiti, because of the labyrinthe of bribes and bureaucracy.
It's too bad they can't leverage the informal economies.
It always amazes me how a market can spring up no matter the product. I like to read stories like this one.
Wow, all that uninhibited commerce. Somebody oughtta regulate that. Y'know, for the common good...
Damn you ChrisO! You're gonna ruin my inspirational take from this story.
Winter Sodier,
I would say about 5 bucks but the dollar has been so devalued they
might laugh and offer pesos.
The Winter Soldier,
You don't sell those now. Store them in a climate controlled place
for 20 years and sell them as ironic tees to hipster doofuses
(doufi?).
You don't sell those now. Store them in a climate controlled
place for 20 years and sell them as ironic tees to hipster doofuses
(doufi?).
I suspect there will be a good market for them in no more than 4
your years, personally.
Probably. They could strike through the '08 and scribble a
'12.
"This time, she really deserves it!"
That is so cool! Plus, since my only frame of reference is
American suburbs + AtlasShrugged, I know that no one need worry
about the possibility of FlyByNight sellers selling unwashed
products infected with diseases which are then worn without washing
and result in costly epidemics or things like that.
Up with markets!
If you travel to a third-world country and don't leave better
dressed than you were when you arrive, you are of all people most
unimaginative.
I understand that this type of resaling is a worldwide phenomenon.
I certainly made use of it in northern India, although there the
locals' tastes lean more towards dress shirts and slacks.
So is Lonewacko:
(a) somehow unaware that thrift shops that sell used clothes have
existed here in the United States for decades,
(b) aware that they exist, and of the opinion that they are a
hidden public health nuisance that should be banned, or
(c) aware that they exist, but of the opinion that they're harmless
as long as those UnClean BlackPeople and BrownPeople don't trade
clothes there?
Don't ask why, just marvel as he sinks to the level of the lowest Reason commenter and engages in race-baiting and fails to note that - shock! - ThriftStores are no doubt regulated and licensed and that's designed to minimize the HealthRisks of UsedClothing. Oh, the Oppression!
I don't think that noting the intense racial paranoia that
obviously animates so many of your comments qualifies as
"race-baiting," LW. But I'll happily agree that communicating with
you qualifies as "sink[ing] to the level of the lowest Reason
commenter."
As for the rest: I hardly know where to begin. I point to a story
about entrepreneurship in the Third World, and your first thought
is that the clothes are probably crawling with vermin, that
Haitians are too dumb to wash the clothes before wearing them, and
that this somehow says something about libertarianism. I point out
that equivalent versions of the trade exist in the U.S., and you
reply that there are regulations here. There are regulations in
Haiti, too, though I doubt they have much of an impact on the
vendors' activity. And of course it's easy to buy used clothes
without any regulatory intercession at all in the United States, at
these wild little germ-pits called "yard sales." So what? What
point do you think you're making?
I'm going to assume that Jesse Walker's observation of my
"intense racial paranoia" is akin to "liberals" calling those who
oppose racism racists, and includes things such as my pointing out
how politicians and groups are seeking race-based power. Seeing as
that's based in not just collectivism but immutable characteristics
one might think that that would be something that someone
supposedly on the right would oppose. I guess some things speak
louder than others.
And, Walker continues his race-baiting with an attempt to think my
concerns about "vermin" in the clothing is simply because they were
worn by Haitians. What Walker fails to note is that our society is
a bit different from that in Haiti and that those who hold yard
sales will generally speaking avoid selling dangerous items lest
they face legal consequences. And, of course, the aforementioned
rules and regulations relating to ThriftShops and similar
dealers.
Rather than reply to all your non-sequiturs, LW, I'm just going to repeat my earlier question: What point do you think you're making?
The point is that "libertarians" continue to try to make stupid
points that make little economic sense. The costs of a free-for-all
market such as that described above could be great, such as by
spreading disease or infestations.
I'm also doing research for the next thing like this
or this.
I should really read Mystery of Capital again. I remember it being very good.
The point is that "libertarians" continue to try to make
stupid points that make little economic sense.
And what "stupid point" do you believe you are arguing against?
Tell us again about the nofollow tags, lonely whacker. I never get tired of that one.
The reason that the Haitian government is unable to function is because of unregulated, untaxed black markets like this. By engaging in this selfish capitalism they steal money from the state treasury, undermine the regulatory environment, and damage the common good.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245