Mississippi Supreme Court Considering Two Death Penalty Cases Involving Dr. Steven Hayne

According to the A.P., the Mississippi Supreme Court is now considering post-conviction appeals from Jeffrey Havard and Devin Bennett, two cases in which a man was convicted and sentenced to death for killing a child in his care. Both men were convicted thanks in large part to the testimony of Dr. Steven Hayne, the prolific Mississippi medical examiner I wrote about last October, and who has come under fire from the national and Mississippi chapters of the Innocence Project for his role in the recent exonerations of Kennedy Brewer and Levon Brooks.

Neither Bennett's nor Havard's case involves DNA the state could test to conclusively prove either man's guilt or innocence. In both cases, a child died in while in the care of the accused. There were no other witnesses to the childrens' deaths, and in each case, the men say the deaths were accidents. In both cases, the state heavily relied on Dr. Hayne's autopsy and testimony to establish that the deaths were intentional, and to win a conviction and a death sentence. Finally, in both cases reputable, board-certified medical professionals have come forward to challenge Dr. Hayne's conclusions, thus far to no effect.

I've written about the Havard case before. Here's a summary from my article last fall:

Consider Jeffrey Havard, convicted in 2002 of killing his then-girlfriend’s six-month-old daughter. Havard claims he was bathing the child when she slipped from his hands and hit her head on the toilet. But Hayne testified at Havard’s trial that bruises, scratches, and cranial bleeding indicated a case of shaken baby syndrome. Hayne also testified that the child’s anus was dilated, indicating sexual abuse. The DNA evidence was inconclusive: Havard’s DNA was not found on the baby, but both his DNA and hers were found on a sheet from the bed where she had gone to sleep that night, which was also the bed Havard shared with his girlfriend.

Because there were no witnesses to the incident, the evidence of sexual abuse was key to securing Havard’s conviction and death sentence; the charge was “murder in the commission of sexual battery.” Havard, who had no money, was assigned a public defender. His lawyer was suspicious of Hayne’s conclusions and at trial asked the court for funds to hire an independent pathologist to review Hayne’s findings. The judge refused, ruling that Hayne, the prosecution’s witness, was qualified and sufficient.

After Havard was convicted, attorneys from Mississippi’s post-conviction relief office, which represents indigent defendants in their appeals, were able to get James Lauridson, Alabama’s former state medical examiner, to review Hayne’s work in the Havard case. According to an affidavit he filed with the Mississippi Supreme Court in 2004, Lauridson found significant problems with Hayne’s testimony. Most notably, factors not related to abuse—e.g., rigor mortis—can often cause the anus to dilate after death.

In February 2006 the Mississippi State Supreme Court nevertheless upheld Havard’s conviction. It refused even to consider Lauridson’s review of Hayne’s work, ruling that any expert testimony refuting Hayne’s conclusions had to have been introduced at trial. Havard’s attorney had tried to do that, of course, but the trial judge denied him the necessary money.

[...]

The Havard case is now entering a second round of appeals. Lauridson and Havard’s lawyers wouldn’t discuss the case for this article, citing the ongoing appeal (though Lauridson did call it “a miscarriage of justice”). But according to the court clerk, at press time the case was being delayed because Hayne wouldn’t turn his autopsy records over to Havard’s defense team for review.

As for Devin Bennett, he was convicted of killing his son by (according to Hayne) shaking and/or slamming the boy's head against a wall or the floor. Bennett says the child was sleeping in a car-seat cradle, and died when Bennett inadvertently kicked the seat off the bed during his sleep. Bennett and his ex-wife (the mother of the child) both testified that Bennett tends to kick violently in his sleep. Unlike Havard, Bennett was also able to find an expert testify in his defense, Dr. Emily Ward.

Ward was Mississippi's last official state medical examiner. When she took office, Ward was shocked at Dr. Hayne's prolific autopsy output, and at the way coroners and prosecutors were using him to win convictions.  She tried to institute reforms to add some oversight and credibility to the system.  Like her predecessor, Dr. Lloyd White, she didn't last long.  Ward resigned in 1995 after the state's coroners and prosecutors rose up against her and circulated a petition calling for her ouster. The man who headed up that petition? None other than Dr. Michael West. You can read a PDF of the petition here.

Again, from my article last fall:

It was West who circulated a petition among the state’s county coroners calling for Ward’s resignation. Forty-two of the state’s 82 coroners signed the document, which accused Ward of failing to support the coroners, diminishing their authority, improperly assisting defense counsel in criminal cases, and attempting to “establish a political power base.” West told the Jackson Clarion-Ledger in 1995 that the state’s Department of Public Safety had “never been able to keep this woman under control.”

The Clarion-Ledger contacted 30 of the 42 signatories to West’s petition and learned that most of them sent their autopsies to Hayne. The paper also found that more than half of the signatories repeated hearsay about Ward they’d heard from other coroners, and could cite no personal grievances against her. The paper concluded that the petition was the result of a “power struggle” between Hayne and Ward.

Not all of Mississippi’s coroners agreed with West’s assessment of Ward. One told the paper the petition was “baseless” and “looked like a group of fifth-graders had written it.” Another lamented that “a small group of individuals for whatever reason—for personal gain or personal ego—have continued to badger Dr. Ward.”

Qualified medical examiners outside of Mississippi seemed to agree. Jamie Downs, who serves on NAME’s board of directors and now practices in Georgia, hired Ward to work for him when he was Alabama’s state medical examiner. “We knew what happened in Mississippi,” Downs says, referring to Ward’s experience in Jackson. “And I’ll just say that hiring Dr. Ward was a no-brainer. She’s a well-qualified, competent medical examiner. And that alone puts her in a completely different league than Dr. Hayne.”

Ward resigned her position in Mississippi in June 1995. The office has been vacant ever since.

Given her tumultuous time as the state medical examiner, Ward was reluctant to review Hayne's work in the Bennett case. But Bennett's lawyer persisted, even threatening to get a court order. Ward finally agreed, performed a second autopsy, and found that the child's injuries were more consistent with Bennett's story than with the testimony of Dr. Hayne. Incredibly, during a particularly contentious cross examination, the prosecutor actually brought up Ward's time as state medical examiner, and talked about how West and the state's coroners rose up against her. He was trying to paint her as an outsider and a troublemaker in order to malign her credibility with the jury.

This same prosecutor who was relying on Dr. Hayne then went on to question Dr. Ward's methods and practices (Ward currently works in Alabama and, unlike Hayne, is generally well-regarded by her peers). During his questioning, the prosecutor read from the text of Forensic Pathology, considered the premiere text book in the field, written by the renowned medical examiner Dr. Vincent DiMaio. The prosecutor badgered Ward, mangling her testimony with out-of-context quotes from DiMaio's book to actually make Ward look like the incompetent physician.

But I actually interviewed Dr. DiMaio for my article on Hayne. Here are the relevant excerpts:

Vincent DiMaio, author of Forensic Pathology, widely considered the profession’s guiding textbook, says of Hayne’s remarkable annual output: “You can’t do it. After 250 [forensic] autopsies, you start making small mistakes. At 300, you’re going to get mental and physical strains on your body. Over 350, and you’re talking about major fatigue and major mistakes.” That isn’t even a quarter of the number of forensic autopsies Hayne has said he performs each year.

[...]

“The Mississippi medical examiner system doesn’t exist, except in name only,” concludes DiMaio, the forensic expert and textbook author. “This man provides a service—and at a discount. You’re not going to get any change in a system where all the people in power are happy.”

It's rather perverse that a book written by the man who gave the quotes above was used by a prosecutor before a jury to not only validate Dr. Hayne's conclusions, but to impugn the opinions of a more competent doctor questioning his conclusions.

But it worked. The jury apparently found Hayne more credible than Ward, and convicted Bennett of killing his son. The Mississippi State Supreme Court has already ruled once on this case. The court upheld Bennett's conviction, and unfortunately found nothing untoward about the prosecutor's questioning of Ward. Ward told me last fall that she believes Bennett is innocent. Former Alabama state medical examiner Dr. James Lauridson has also since joined in Bennett's defense.

Obviously no one but Jeffrey Havard and Devin Bennett truly knows whether the deaths of the children in their care were accidents or homicides. Both men may well be guilty. Bennett seemed to have trouble keeping his story straight when talking to authorities. His defense chalked that up to trauma and adrenalin. But each man is due to be executed in large part because of the testimony of Hayne, a doctor whose credibility and objectivity have, to put it mildly, been called into question. These aren't your typical cases where a reputable prosecution witness was challenged by a defense expert "gun for hire." They're cases in which respected, credible medical examiners have questioned the conclusions of a prosecution witness who doesn't abide by the standards of his profession, whose credibility has been attacked by his peers and colleagues, and who played a role in the convictions of at least two men who were objectively innocent.

The Mississippi Supreme Court has said it will rule on both cases based solely on the briefs filed by prosecutors and defense attorneys, and will not hear oral arguments.

It would be a tragic injustice for the state of Mississippi to execute either of these men without a new trial—preferably one in which Dr. Hayne isn't permitted to testify.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Franz Kafka||

    You're putting me out of work.

  • Fluffy||

    Isn't Mississippi also the state where if a minor cuts school or runs away from home, they are sent to a concentration camp to be tortured and raped?

    Or is that some other shitty southern state?

  • Missississippi ||

    It's not Mississippi, you "Fluffy" jackass.

  • bill||

    It would be interesting if you could tell us the makeup of the juries, maybe even talk to some of them and find out why they were willing to convict AND give the death penalty.

  • Fluffy||

    Bill, if the state puts a medical expert on the stand and tells you some guy ass-raped a 6 month old and then bashed her head until she was dead, it isn't that difficult to see a jury handing out the death penalty.

    This is why the state should not be allowed to use medical experts who are full of shit.

    And it's also why the state should be compelled to pay for expert witnesses hired by indigent defendants.

  • ||

    Can I get a "More Below the Fold?"

    Who do you think you are, Julian Sanchez?

    And great work as always.

  • Episiarch||

    If this gets wide enough exposure--and people get let out--I have a feeling there will be quite a few people looking for Hayne.

  • ||

    Radley Balko - working overtime for justice.
    Please keep it up.

  • bill||

    @Fluffy

    Well sure if it's your classic deep south all-white jury trying a poor black man. I've lived in the south. I've been to Miss. many times. They aren't the most highly educated people in the world. Yes that's a negative stereotype but that doesn't mean it's not true. The same testimony in a more liberal state with a mixed race jury might not reach the same conclusion. That's why I was wondering what the make up of the jury was and what they found so compelling in Hanyes' testimony.

  • Prickley||

    Radley,

    I would lihe to give you some advice. Stay away from Missippi. Call me crazy, but I just get the feeling that if you were to be pulled over for speeding and they found out who you were, you might get an extended stay in a state institution.

  • ||

    Parchman is a nice place to die, but ya wouldn't want to live there.

  • pam||

    Mississippi hates children but it loves giving them the gift of life.

  • Ramblin\' Gamblin Man||

    Boycott Mississippi.

    Tourism, especially centered around the casinos of the Gulf Coast and Tunica, is a major industry for Mississippi. Stay away and tell anyone else you might know that is thinking about a trip there to go elsewhere (New Orleans isn't that far from Biloxi/Gulfport and it has its own casinos).

    After all, how safe can a tourist be in a State where the criminal justice system is completely disfunctional, and the powers that be, from the Governor on down, are either corrupt or lack the balls to do anything to clean it up?

    Don't gamble on Mississippi.

  • ||

    >i>"improperly assisting defense counsel in criminal cases"

    Huh?

    Oh, sorry, I forgot that the coroners only job was to help secure a conviction, not to establish the facts.

  • ||

    Dang Spanish keyboards.

  • Jessica||

    Have u try the online bookstore Cocomartini.com
    http://www.cocomartini.com

    I get all my textbooks for this semester from this bookstore. All are brand new textbooks and half price discount textbooks and cheap textbooks.

    Good luck and wish some help.

    hehe ^_^

  • ||

    oooooh! Spambot fun!

    I'm just relieved a certain commenter from the agitator isn't hanging out in this mirror thread.

    Would y'all believe that I came over here for a breath of sanity?

  • Robert||

    Before I scrolled down, the framing on my screen was such as to say at the bottom, "Mississippi Supreme Court Considering Two Death Penalty", and I thought they meant a penalty of killing someone twice.

  • Jessica||

    Have u try the online bookstore Cocomartini.com
    http://www.cocomartini.com

    I get all my textbooks for this semester from this bookstore. All are brand new textbooks and half price discount textbooks and cheap textbooks.

    Good luck and wish some help.

    hehe ^_^

  • ||

    This is the first time I've even heard about this case. But I'm sitting here slack-jawed. If I go see my doctor and she tells me I need surgery, I go get a second opinion. But if I'm convicted and sentenced to die based on the testimony of a medical examiner with questionable conclusions, a judge denies me a second opinion?
    Have I suddenly moved to a third world country?

  • Melissa||

    This is disgusting, tragic and paints a very unfortunate, revealing picture of the legal system. It is vile the way the law operates, I really hope justice is served for these men before it's too late. Good article. It's case like these which remind me why I'm going into law, things need to change. IMO they should abolish the death penalty all together, it doesn't belong in a modern society and its purpose appears to be only revenge. What then seperates the law from the criminals!?!!!! They cannot/should not be able to kill these men with so much controversey surrounding their cases!

  • geez||

    jeffrey havard has been largely convicted not on haynes testimony but the fact that he raped and shook that baby to her DEATH it doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure out that he was alone with the child and her anus was the size of a quarter and her hips shattered her frenulum torn i mean come on he did it no questions the mother knows it and so does havard

  • ProudMary||

    Devin Bennett is an innocent man that has been falsely convicted. They offered him a plea deal to take the Death Penalty off the table if he addmitted to killing his son. He refused because he is innocent so they gave him the Death Penalty!

  • ||

    I know devin personally ,we roomed together when this happened and wish it was somethin i coud do to help,he is innocent

  • ||

    Is otrageous dear fellows. I think Dr. Ward's statement could be of a great importance in this case. Dr. Hayne on the other hand seems to be under serious doubt.

    But there's something I consider to be curious. Some members of the Jury were black men, it's so amazing that nowadays mostly white male men are receiving the death sentence.

    I'm not a KKK supporter neither racist, but curiously if you take a look all the executions carried out in the state are of white males, meanwhile according to statistics the majority of those who commit capital murders are black males.

    Curious isn't it? perhaps we're going to the other side of racism. Today just check the trial records and many are waived the death penalty in MS for heinous and wicked crimes just for "negroe resenment",that make the authorities tremble to imposse death sentence.

    Take the case of Corey Maye, life in prison for comitting cold blood murder, with aggravating circumstances, take curiously a man called Derrick Bennett, also in MS, a black male for life for a crime twice awful than Devin.

    Bennett deserves a fair trial, and have to be released. I can't believe what's happening in the States.

    A cold blood negroe murderer is always innocent, always ill retarded, always unfair deffense, always granted appeals in MS, black jurors taking revenge for their resenment with the society against the whites that fall to their hands.

    insult me if you want, this is the god damm true¡¡¡¡

  • wizard of oz books||

    With many new announcement about the wizard of oz movies in the news, you might want to consider starting to obtain Wizard of Oz book series either as collectible or investment at RareOzBooks.com.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Progressive Puritans: From e-cigs to sex classifieds, the once transgressive left wants to criminalize fun.
  • Port Authoritarians: Chris Christie’s Bridgegate scandal
  • The Menace of Secret Government: Obama’s proposed intelligence reforms don’t safeguard civil liberties

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement