Jacob Sullum | June 18, 2007
Today the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that passengers as well as drivers can challenge traffic stops as unreasonable seizures prohibited by the Fourth Amendment. The decision involved Bruce Brendlin, who was riding in a car that was stopped by police in Yuba City, California, in 2001 for no particular reason. After the car was stopped, police recognized Brendlin, who was wanted for a parole violation, and searched him, finding "methamphetamine paraphernalia" that led to possession and manufacturing charges. Brendlin challenged the search, arguing that the traffic stop was unconstitutional, based on neither probable cause nor reasonable suspicion. The state fended off Brendlin's challenge by arguing that only the driver of the car had been "seized"; as a passenger, Brendlin was free to go. The California Supreme Court bought this argument, but the U.S. Supreme Court disagreed, concluding that "no reasonable person in his position when the car was stopped would have believed himself free to 'terminate the encounter' between the police and himself."
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
The state fended off Brendlin's challenge by arguing that
only the driver of the car had been "seized"; as a passenger,
Brendlin was free to go.
"Citizen, you are free to go, at which point you will be
immediately arrested for fleeing an officer."
WTF is "methampetamine paraphenalia"? As an ex dope fiend I am inexplicably dumbfounded.
methampetamine paraphenalia = a can of starter fluid? I'm not an ex dope fiend, so I may have gotten that wrong, but I once worked with a guy who used to make it cheaply out of something like that.
"I interpreted his behavior as an attempt to conceal evidence. It raised a suspicion in my mind."
Why, to fuel up my tractor, of course. How else am I going to
plow my alfalfa fields?
Hm? Oh, plowing the alfalfa field is terrible for my
allegeries.
"no reasonable person in his position when the car was
stopped would have believed himself free to 'terminate the
encounter' between the police and himself."
...as demonstrated on several TV channels a night when the car
stops and passengers get out, hop the guardrail, and run.
Mike - all of those scenes tend to end with the passenger on the ground getting cuffed.
Does a meth pipe look any different than a crack pice, an MJ
pipe etc? I just popped pills and ran it once.
PS Don't ever run meth. I really, really mean
that.
"no reasonable person in his position when the car was stopped
would have believed himself free to 'terminate the encounter'
between the police and himself."
So this means that only unreasonable people are aware of their
rights?
I've always found it interesting that the local LEO's will arrest passengers for public drunkeness when the driver of a vehicle is arrested and the passengers are too intoxicated to drive themselves home.
Finally, a unanimous Supreme Court decision that gets it right on civil liberties. Who'da thunk?
Excuse Me, Officer, Do You Mind If I Walk the Rest of the
Way?
tried that once and you know how it turned out
Well now I'm curious. 'Splain, plz.
Episiarch, running a drug is 70s slang for injecting it directly
into the bloodstream. Doing this was incredibly stupid and the
worst self inflicted drug experiene I ever went through. Hope that
clears it up for you.
J sub D,
I understand the running part--I was curious as to why it
was so bad, as in what happened.
"Excuse Me, Officer, Do You Mind If I Walk the Rest of the
Way?
tried that once and you know how it turned out"
It would probably help if, at the next traffic stop for suspected
DWI, you didn't insist the police officer address you by your
nickname The Winecommonsewer.
Episiarch, my heart started racing immediately. I literally thought I was going into cardiac arrest. Taking methadrine orally gives you enrergy, banishes fatigue and allows you to concentrate more intently. Running it (maybe too large a dose?) made me feel my whole body was out of control. I'll go further by admonishing all to keep away from all amphetamines unless prescibed by a physician. No, atheletic trainers don't count.
You'd think it incredibly obvious that when stopped by the
police, you are not, in fact, free to go. Yet this somehow escaped
the CA court.
Three cheers for the SCOTUS for a change.
"Don't ever run meth"
Tell that to JFK!
flipside don't ever NOT "run" morphine
takes a much higher dose orally (4 times if I recall and
empirically that is an understatement)
snorted morphine sulfate has no effect whatsoever
Great, so you libertarians think paraphernalia shouldn't be illegal? Just wait till someone does it to one of your children.
It would probably help if, at the next traffic stop for
suspected DWI, you didn't insist the police officer address you by
your nickname The Winecommonsewer.
LOL.
Last time I got caught in a DUI checkpoint the nice cop asked if
I'd been drinking and I said No, Officer, not at all.
Whenever you guys refer to the Supers as SCOTUS my mind morphs that into SCROTUS and I LOL. This happens EVERY time.
As a passenger, I've spent time in the back of the cop-car
awaiting the driver-consented search to happen. We had nothing to
hide except the half-bottle of wine in the trunk, which the police
threatened to arrest us all for "open container", duh.
I will never consent to a search, and I will now refuse them if I
am a passenger.
It's good to see the Supremes can still sing "Stop! In the Name of Justice" once in a while.
The Utah preacher who had umpteen wives and was arrested while riding in a suburban with no plates driven by someone else, recognized and arrested, should be able to get loose over this, right? Somehow, I don't think so.
You might want to check the application of this case to the
Franconia shooting tragedy.
Make sure to click the links because they all tell one hell of a
story.
http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/06/was-liko-kenney-speeding-or-not.html
And here is how the State reacted to our cameras:
http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/06/kingcast-open-letter-to-nh-ags-ayotte.html
Peace.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245