Maternity Leave Hype

Extended leisure time

The appealing concept behind longer maternity leave is that newborns will benefit from more time spent with their mothers. But when four economists took a look at the expansion in paid maternity leave in Norway from 18 to 35 weeks, they found that it mostly has "amounted to a pure leisure transfer, primarily to middle and upper income families." The increased paid leave did not reduce the amount of unpaid leave that new mothers took. Instead, it paid them to stay off their jobs even longer.

The study, which the National Bureau of Economic Research published in October, also noted that longer paid maternity leave "had little effect on a wide variety of outcomes, including children's school outcomes, parental earnings and participation in the labor market in the short or long run, completed fertility, marriage or divorce." The authors do not argue against paid maternity leave per se, but they point out that the increase in paid leave has reduced economic efficiency without providing any measurable benefits.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.


Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.