24/7 Newsfeed

Put Reason 24/7 on Your Site


Follow Reason 24/7 on Twitter and via RSS

Circuit Court Critical of California DNA-Gathering Law

An en banc panel of the 9th Circuit criticized a California law that allows police officers to collect DNA samples from anyone arrested for a felony.

Their comments contrast wildly with the opinion reached by a three-judge panel in February that allowed the statute to go forward.

"DNA is much more severe an intrusion than a fingerprint," said Judge Harry Pregerson, who seemed particularly disturbed by the law.

A class of sampling subjects sued the state in 2009, claiming the collection of DNA samples constituted an illegal seizure of their genetic information and violated their due-process rights. Lead plaintiff Elizabeth Haskell was arrested in March 2009 at a peace rally for allegedly obstructing an officer. She claims police told her she would be charged with a separate misdemeanor when she refused to let authorities swab the inside of her cheek, the typical method officers use to collect DNA.

Source: Courthouse News. Read full article. (link)

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.