The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
"The Day Will Come When Those Disappointed by Today's Result" as to Tariffs …
"will appreciate the legislative process for the bulwark of liberty it is."
A prediction from the conclusion of Justice Gorsuch's concurrence in the tariffs decision:
For those who think it important for the Nation to impose more tariffs, I understand that today's decision will be disappointing.
All I can offer them is that most major decisions affecting the rights and responsibilities of the American people (including the duty to pay taxes and tariffs) are funneled through the legislative process for a reason. Yes, legislating can be hard and take time. And, yes, it can be tempting to bypass Congress when some pressing problem arises. But the deliberative nature of the legislative process was the whole point of its design.
Through that process, the Nation can tap the combined wisdom of the people's elected representatives, not just that of one faction or man. There, deliberation tempers impulse, and compromise hammers disagreements into workable solutions. And because laws must earn such broad support to survive the legislative process, they tend to endure, allowing ordinary people to plan their lives in ways they cannot when the rules shift from day to day.
In all, the legislative process helps ensure each of us has a stake in the laws that govern us and in the Nation's future. For some today, the weight of those virtues is apparent. For others, it may not seem so obvious. But if history is any guide, the tables will turn and the day will come when those disappointed by today's result will appreciate the legislative process for the bulwark of liberty it is.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Interesting nit to pick.
(including the duty to pay taxes and tariffs)
Tariffs ARE taxes. What next, "thumbs and fingers"? When people point out AI goofs, they don't say "that hand has five fingers and a thumb", they say "that hand has six fingers". When there's an accident with dangerous tools, they say "count your fingers", not "count your fingers and thumbs".
I mean, legalese is full of doublets.
But here I think Gorsuch is trying to address the non-specialist reader and make sure that reader understands tariffs and taxes are both implicated and avoid any problems caused by a misunderstanding about what tariffs are.
If you only "think" you know what he means, then he's not clear enough, and his little doublet hasn't helped any.
Through that process, the Nation can tap the combined wisdom of the people's elected representatives, not just that of one faction or man.
TRAITOR!
Remember this principle the next time people run to courts rather than their legislator to address new problems.
Gore-Sucks! Solution is clear, Judge Thomas gets 4 Votes, “Affirmative Action” you see.
"combined wisdom of the people's elected representatives"
LOL Congress? Wisdom?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IC3W1BiUjp0
How do you keep up with the news like that?
Great Comment!
The combined wisdom of the People’s Elected Representatives???
Which wouldn’t equal the wisdom of Curly Howard after one of Moe’s Dope Slaps, and I’m talking the Repubiclowns also.
Frank
Obviously.
I can't decide whether I should be sad or not that Harry Reid didn't understand this principle in 2013, Mitch McConnell schooled him back then. He got his DC circuit judges, the rest of us got the Supreme Court which decided as it did today.
It would be nice if some provocateurs would stop trying to undermine the Supreme Court's legitimacy, because they can't get their way with lawfare and often only go that route because they already know they won't get their way in legislatures, or it's really difficult.
Add Gorsuch to Blackman's *hit list. He's already denounced Roberts and Barrett for failure to meet the intellectual standards of South Texas College of Law, now it will be Gorsuch's turn.
Borrowing from William S. Buckley, (Google him you incredible Legal Ignoramus)
I'd rather be governed by any Graduate of South Texas College of Law, than the entire Law Review of Hah-Vud Law (I saw "The Paper Chase" they didn't impress me with their intelligence, and Barry Hussein Osama? "Spyder" from "Goodfellas" didn't stutter as much. )
Frank
You voted for John McStain and Romney!! Lolololololol!!!
What a cuck. (That's sarcasm in case it needs to be spelled out to anyone.)
US Constitution Article II Section 4, it's there for a reason.
It's interesting that Justice Gorsuch chose this case to really read the riot act to his fellow justices (except the Chief). There is a certain measure of satisfaction in seeing Sotomayor/Kagan/Jackson and Alito/Thomas/Kavanaugh get called out for pumping the brakes on their internal jurisprudential principles depending on which side they like more. But I am kind of surprised to see Kavanaugh split from the Chief here.
PETER DOOCY: "Do you have to refund $175 billion dollars?"
PRESIDENT TRUMP: "They take months and months to write an opinion and they don't even discuss that point."
"We've taken in hundreds of billions of dollars, not millions, hundreds of billions of dollars. And so I said, well, what happens to all the money that we took in? It wasn't discussed. Wouldn't you think they would have put one sentence in there saying that, keep the money or don't keep the money, right?"