The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Zen and the Art of Persuasive Writing, Introduction
Nine mantras to persuasion.

We have an epidemic. The virus is known to travel on paper and transmit over the keyboard: it jumps from old lawyer to young lawyer, preys on the inexperienced and insecure lawyer, and thrives in the imprecise and indifferent lawyer. It spreads like wildfire in college towns and institutions of higher learning. And it mutates! Oh boy, does it mutate. Turning verbs into nouns. Adverbs flourish. Adjectives and jargon run free.
That epidemic is bad writing—especially legal and persuasive writing. Legal prose is often dull and opaque, redundant and bumpy, labored and disorganized. It sputters and coughs in the opening sentences, leaving an unnavigable and incomprehensible mess for the reader to withstand. It's hard to read, harder to understand and hardest to remember. It prefers abstractions—abstract words and abstract grammar; abstract facts and abstract arguments. And it weighs on the reader's brain.
Why is so much legal and persuasive prose so bad? I think it's because many legal writers never stop to think about their readers. The elixir for this oversight is mindfulness. A persuasive writer anticipates, meets and remembers the preferences and expectations of his readers. He cares about communication and seizes control of his literary fate—guiding the writing process from start to finish. He knows why he writes, what he writes and how he writes. He knows that persuasive prose is not a monologue, but a dialogue between writer and reader. This book introduces the path to persuasion in nine mantras.
Be aware of the audience. A persuasive writer understands the singular importance of the audience and appreciates the inherent challenges that arise when time and distance separate readers from writers, so he channels the readers to anticipate and answer their questions.
Be less categorical. Persuasive writers know that few rules are absolute. When it comes to persuasion, musty preferences are not nimble enough to track the dynamic evolution of language and communication.
Be clear and concrete. Persuasive prose conveys hard facts and ideas in plain and simple words. It favors plain nouns and vivid verbs; disfavors jargon and abstractions. It flows and sounds natural, even conversational, never driving readers to secondary sources to sharpen an image or understand a point. A persuasive writer appeals to the human senses, knowing that abstractions extract a heavy cognitive toll on the reader's brain. He knows the law has clung to abstract grammar and abstract words for hundreds of years, but he forsakes obtuse writing in the name of communication.
Be concise. A persuasive writer severs the meaningful from the meaningless. He is focused and assured. He understands the nuances of his argument—its strengths and weaknesses—and he uses that knowledge to disentangle the issues and unscramble the facts.
Be cohesive and coherent. Persuasive prose is easy on the eyes and simple to navigate, wielding the power of transitions and priming. A persuasive writer knows how his document fits together, sentence to sentence and paragraph to paragraph.
Be compelling. A persuasive writer holds the readers' attention and interest for long enough to move their hearts and minds. He knows that persuasive prose is art, both literary and logical, and uses the power of analogy and literary devices to that end.
Be credible. A persuasive writer earns his reputation with colleagues and the courts, acting honestly and urging only plausible arguments with clarity of thought. A fine reputation is not purchased or invoked by the advocate; rather, it is bestowed by the audience.
Be a reader and writer. A persuasive writer reads and reverse-engineers the language, style and approach of the stuff he likes. He knows what moves him and leverages that experience to improve his writing. He writes frequently to cultivate and refine his skills.
Be meticulous and rewrite. A persuasive writer labors to guarantee the audience will understand his point. He knows that persuasive prose is the end product of many drafts and myriad decisions. A persuasive writer sheds any stubborn, unproductive attachment to his own words and thoughts—like a rattlesnake sheds its skin. He drafts and redrafts until it flows.
When writers account for these nine mantras, persuasive prose is sublime. It leaps from the page and grabs readers by the collar, commanding their interest and attention until the very last word.
A word about my approach and teaching style. We immerse ourselves in the fundamentals of writing and explore the art of persuasion from the reader's perspective. My tools are practical, my lessons universal, presented for immediate use and instant improvement. In the words of our founding father Thomas Paine, "I offer nothing more than simple facts, plain arguments, and common sense."
My advice is anchored in science because writing is an intensely personal exercise. When someone audits our words, it causes our stomachs to squirm, our blood pressure to increase, and our brows to furrow, activating an arsenal of defense mechanisms. By adding an objective element to persuasive writing—data from studies in psychology and psycholinguistics—I hope to overcome this natural reaction. Even better, the book is peppered with research that validates what I teach.
This book is not about hard and fast rules. My hope is to deliver practical advice in an accessible and entertaining way. You may read the pages and chapters in any order, picking the advice that resonates with you.
I lean on history's best and brightest to model and confirm my methods. My guest luminaries are a motley crew of founding fathers and philosophers, authors and scientists. Each has left us his or her enduring wisdom on language and literature, which I cherish and think you will too, delivered with humor and grace.
My guest luminaries have much to teach about the art of legal and persuasive writing. From Mark Twain, a preference for concrete prose and command of modern English. From William Shakespeare, a love of concision. From Ernest Hemingway, a predatory instinct to eliminate unnecessary words and trifling points. From the Rolling Stones, a mistrust of convention. From Stephen King, a fidelity to nouns and verbs and intolerance for adverbs and adjectives. The plain and simple words of these luminaries are sprinkled throughout this book.
When it comes to legal writers, I rely on the wisdom and punchy prose of great advocates—the lions of our profession. I extract jurisprudential nectar from past and present justices and judges. You have your favorites; I have mine. From the past, I cherish Antonin Scalia, Learned Hand and Robert Jackson. From the present, I admire Richard Posner and Elena Kagan. Their helpful advice fuels lucid prose. I include some of my stuff too, spanning years of private practice, government counsel and now the bench.
Meditation: Legal writing is the common thread that binds all forms of law practice. Many law students see legal writing class as an elective, unworthy of their finite attention because it's not substantive law. That's wrong. A lawyer who cannot write well is like an opera singer with laryngitis.
This excerpt is taken from Zen and the Art of Persuasive Writing. Purchase now where books are sold, including Amazon and Barnes & Noble.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Thank you Judge Weinzeig and look forward to reading your book. Reading spawns an interest in writing as you note. Meeting college grads who never read the classics, can't identify a Shakespeare character, never heard of Orwell nor 1984, dwells on me. One author you don't mention in the note who wrote what I believe to be the most intelligent essays on writing, Robert Louis Stevenson. (Who may be referenced in your book). Impressively detailed on technical, artistic and moral components. "Do not write merely to be understood. Write so you cannot possibly be misunderstood."
I have struggled with connecting thoughts and was just talking to son yesterday about considering his audience(s) for a writing project. Flagging this to spend more time with later.
I looked at the price eeek! and wish it were priced more affordably, in the $10-15 range consistent with other books in this area (for example the Harvard Business Review Guide to Better Business Writing), which to me is one of the best writing guides out there.
Agreed. I gasped when I saw the price.
I’ll wait until I can get it through an interlibrary loan.
What if... the publisher (ABA) set the price high so nobody would read it, thereby preserving the ABAs monopoly through obfuscation?
LOL. This is the kind of book that people use to launder money for public officials. Invite the judge to speak and host a book signing, where you are contractually obligated to buy 100 books.
>Legal prose is often dull and opaque,
What would you expect? lawyers are often dull and opaque.
I want to give credit where credit’s due. I looked up some of the author’s judicial opinions, looking to answer a simple question: Does Judge Weinzweig live up to his own mantras? Answer: He does a fantastic job!
Reading through Thompson v. Burton, I picked up on exactly what the case was about immediately and flat-out enjoyed reading it! And I say this as a non-lawyer who struggles with legalese. (Albeit a non-lawyer who often ends up reading legal writing.) I read through a few other opinions too, and they were similarly clear and easy to read.
Well done, Judge Weinzweig!
I’ll definitely be reading through the rest of these guest posts as they appear. I’m already brimming with questions, but I want to see if they’re addressed once we get into the details!
I appreciate the shout-out to Stephen King. Although he is famous as an author, he is quite underappreciated as a prose stylist. Back in the '80s when I was in High School, an English teacher recommended that we imitate Louis Auchincloss's style as we tried to develop our own voices. If I were to give the same advice, I'd replace Auchincloss with King (although you could still do a lot worse than Auchincloss).
Depends which "King"
The King who wrote Mr Mercedes, Running Man, and Roadwork?
Or the King that punished us all with The Stand (too long at 800 pages no one needed the 1200 page verson), or The Tommyknockers?
The former sure; the latter needs more editing and less cocaine
Robert Parker and Robert Crais are better examples. These two are consistent across their careers.
The Stand might have been bloated, but it was still clear.
Agree -- also, they re-released an "updated" and even longer (!!!) version of The Stand in the '90s which was far inferior to the original. I am wondering if people have only read that latter version.
But back to style, for my money, The Mist is a masterclass in writing.
As a King-lover, I do agree that a lot of his works could use an edit. I'm personally partial to Pet Sematary, though his short story collections are also top-tier.