The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Senator Cruz Warns About Rising Antisemitism on the Right
"But the danger that I want to highlight to you tonight is not antisemitism on the left. It is antisemitism on the right."
On October 19, Senator Ted Cruz spoke at the 45th Annual Night to Honor Israel.
About a decade ago, antisemitism began rising on the left, and the Democrat Party did nothing.
But in the last 6 months, we have seen antisemitism rising on the right. We must confront it.
My full remarks at the 45th Annual Night to Honor Israel, here: https://t.co/tqvcRNhZLB pic.twitter.com/Ky6jYmWSU9
— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) October 22, 2025
The Wall Street Journal published an excerpt of his remarks:
There is a danger that is very real, and we've talked about antisemitism. Listen, about a decade ago, antisemitism began rising on the left, and the Democrat Party did nothing. And in the decade that followed, it has consumed the Democrat Party. I do not believe this is exaggeration to say there is a real and meaningful pro-Hamas contingent of the Democrat Party in Washington, and the remainder of the Democrats are terrified of the pro-Hamas contingent. We know that.
But the danger that I want to highlight to you tonight is not antisemitism on the left. It is antisemitism on the right. And I'm here to tell you in the last six months, I have seen antisemitism rising on the right in a way I have never seen it in my entire life. Listen, CUFI [Christians United for Israel] is extraordinary. The work that CUFI does is desperately, desperately needed. But I'm here to tell you the church is asleep right now.
If I pick up my phone and send out a tweet, if I say good morning, within minutes, I will have hundreds of blatantly antisemitic responses. When Prime Minister Netanyahu was here a few months ago, I sat down with him for a couple of hours. I raised this issue with him, and his first reaction was he said: Well, that's Qatar. That's Iran. They're paying for it. It's astroturf. And I said, Mr. Prime Minister, yes, but no. Yes, Qatar and Iran are clearly paying for it, and there are bots and they are putting real money behind it. But I am telling you, this is real. It is organic. These are real human beings and it is spreading. In the last year, we had three prominent voices on the right, publicly muse: Gosh, maybe Hitler wasn't that bad a guy after all. Yes he was—he was the embodiment of evil.
And I asked Prime Minister Netanyahu, I said, imagine how different American political history would've been if Rush Limbaugh had been an antisemite instead of a philosemite. We would have a fundamentally different country if Rush Limbaugh had spent years spreading poison. I want to tell especially folks that are no longer teenagers or in your 20s, this poison of antisemitism on the right, it is spreading with young people. It is gaining traction. Part of it is philosophical. There's an isolationism. So they will argue, what business do we have supporting Israel? Why should America support Israel? It's their problem. Let them deal with it.
And let me give you an answer as someone elected to represent 31 million Texans and fight every day for your jobs, your freedom, and your safety and security, the United States supports Israel not because we are helping out a down-on-his-luck neighbor. We're not engaged in a charity act. The United States supports Israel because it is unequivocally in the national security interest of the United States to support Israel.
Cruz is correct. Antisemitism is the world's oldest virus, and plagues all sides of the political spectrum.
Earlier this year, I was invited to speak at NatCon 5, the conference for National Conservatism. I'll admit, I approached this invitation with some hesitation. I was familiar with the growing antisemitism among some national conservatives. But I was also put at ease by the fact that so many Orthodox Jews are leaders within the movement, including Yoram Hazony, Josh Hammer, and others. I ultimately agreed to participate on a panel about the courts with two other well-known Jews, Ron Coleman and Ted Frank. I told myself that the best way to fight antisemitism on the right was to speak at this conference as a proud Jew. It is better that I be present, than absent.
When I arrived at the conference, I was struck by how many Orthodox Jewish men and women I saw. It was extremely impressive. I was quickly added to a Whatsapp group to organize times for prayers. There was Kosher food served at every meal. A Rabbi gave an invocation. Another Rabbi gave a fascinating lecture over kosher burgers on the Torah. I don't think I had ever been to a legal conference with such a visible presence of observant Jews.
Yet, at the same time, there was a tension. Yoram Hazony made a controversial statement during his opening remarks. The key line was:
"Nobody ever said that to be a good natcon you have to love Israel. Nobody ever said that to be a good natcon you have to love Jews. Go take a look at our statement of principles. It's not a requirement."
I was shocked when I heard this message. Here we had an Orthodox Jew, and a leader of a bourgeoning movement, announcing that you do not have to love Jews to be a member. Presumably, you can also hate Jews, and still be a member.
Yet, Hazony still acknowledged the growing antisemitism within this movement:
I have been pretty amazed by the depth of the slander of Jews as a people that there has been online in the last year in a half. The left is long gone down a rabbit hole of hating Jews. I didn't think it would happen on the right. We now have quite a few people on the right who in the last three years have a made a really interesting transition. These are people that I used to used to admire a great deal who have this transition. They used to think that Jews and Christians should be aligned to save America. Now they think that saying good things about the Muslim Brotherhood and Islam and the Quran, that's where they are going. They think Jews are a big problem.
You can watch the full remarks, starting around the nineteen minute mark.
So here is the tension. I think most Christians on the right are steadfast defenders of Israel, and philosemites. Donald Trump is the most pro-Israel president in history. But there is a growing movement of some Christians that are overtly antisemitic.
I think we should all heed Senator Cruz's remarks.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
One need only read the comments on this conservative blog site to see how much antisemitism lies in the right. There is much on the left too, but I think the pro-Israel stance of many conservatives has hidden how many just plain don’t like Jews. It’s an absolute shame.
How would you classify Huckabee?? Doesn’t he want Israel to engage in some pretty crazy stuff to usher in a new messiah that unlike Jesus will say religion is the most important thing and it should control every aspect of life?? Could you imagine the Roman emperor upon learning about Christianity?? Wait, so all that is necessary to be a Christian is to say you are a Christian?? And it asks nothing more of anybody but Christians still feed the poor and are peaceful and good natured?!?! Let’s make it our state religion!!!!
There was an old theory, possibly more of an observation, TV preachers pushed helping Israel decades ago, not out of the kindness of their hearts, but because Israel needed to exist so it could be destroyed in the End Days of the Bible. Ya got no Israel, ya got no way to kick off the good stuff of Revelation.
How profoundly cynical. If that motivation has fallen to the wayside, so much the better.
Trump forced Netanyahu to release 1900 Hamas prisoners at the behest of Qatar!?! With friends like these!!! WTF????
Is there any rhetorical tic more annoying than Sen. Ted Crude and his ilk kvetching about "the Democrat Party"? Democrat is a noun; Democratic is the adjective form thereof. Do those speakers believe that the use of non-standard English is persuasive?
Or is the impulse to channel Joe McCarthy and Rush Slimeball simply irresistible? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoHpSY3IoAI&list=RDSoHpSY3IoAI&start_radio=1
it's "DemoKKKrat"
Wow! a Joe McCarthy reference? and even Rush Limbo's living rent free in your Hai'd 4 years after he cashed it in from the Big Casino.
And you obviously don't realize that showing a pejorative irritates you just guarantees further use of said pejorative.
In Junior High, this kid "Robert" kept calling me "4 Eyes" (I did have those awful Black Horn rim "Cereal Killer Glasses" the Air Force gave kids, even Officer's kids)
and it wasn't fair, because even with the glasses, I was athletic, on the basketball team, while he was a "Band Fag" and didn't play anything.
But he finally stopped calling me that.
I punched him in the nose.
Frank "That's "Doctor" 4 Eyes!"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democrat_Party_(epithet)?wprov=sfti1#
The usage by GOPs has a long history, has become common since Gingrich made a point of using it, and is meant to be derogatory. Strikes me as rather childish, which seems fitting for the modern Publican Party.
NG - you again show yourself to be an unabashed bigot.
Condemning the use of commonly used generic terms is beta phi delta. Why display your bigotry and hatred?
"I think most Christians on the right are steadfast defenders of Israel, and philosemites."
How many Christian Nationalists support Israel because they believe that war in the Middle East will hasten the end times and the battle of Armageddon? https://www.christianity.com/wiki/end-times/is-the-war-in-israel-a-sign-of-the-end-times.html
According to this theology, Jews won't fare too well thereafter:
https://christinprophecy.org/articles/the-biblical-evidence-that-jesus-is-returning-to-reign/
https://bible.org/seriespage/chapter-xiii-armageddon-and-second-coming-christ
Nothing wrong with the linked essay from christianity.com concerning prophecies from the New and Old Testaments and how they align with events of today. The essay includes the following strong statement of support for Israel:
"In a time of immense division and conflict, there is a great rise in antisemitism and hatred of the Jewish people. As Christians, we must take the stand to stand with Israel, for the Jewish people are God's chosen nation. Deuteronomy 7:6 reminds us that Israel belongs to God, "For you are a people holy to the Lord your God. The Lord your God has chosen you out of all the peoples on the face of the earth to be his people, his treasured possession." As Christians, we must stand with God's chosen people and nation, even in the face of opposition."
And just how does Israel fare in the apocalyptic war that Christians hope to bring about?
According to Zech. 13:8, two thirds of Israel’s population will be killed, and there will be a purging of the final third. "For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been from the beginning of the world until now, no, and never will be." Matthew 24:21 (RSV). At the end of tribulation Jesus will return to do battle and establish His power and authority in the earth (Matt. 24:29-31).
This is part of the fate that apocalyptic "Christians" wish upon Israel. https://bibletruthrestored.org/phocadownloadpap/userupload/john/Armageddon%20booklet.pdf With friends like that, who needs enemies?
You take your friends as they are.
Not many. But Josh's comment is disingenuous; the modern GOP has been using the "I support Israel, so I can't be an antisemite" dodge for a long time. (Trump, of course, made it explicit, as is his wont.) Israel is far away and fighting the Muslims that the right dislikes even more; it's not here at home promoting all sorts of liberal causes that the GOP hates.
"How many Christian Nationalists support Israel because they believe that war in the Middle East will hasten the end times and the battle of Armageddon?"
Very, very few. As Sarcasto would say if you were not an ally, you are nut picking.
Its a fringe Christian theology that anything humans can do has an effect on when Jesus returns, no significant sect follows it.
Easy for you to talk about civility, Ted, when your dad assassinated JFK
His dad was Lee Harvey Oswald????
It's my theory that, having effectively closed off any real prospect of third parties displacing them, the major parties no longer need to actually have a positive appeal. Instead they only need to seem less awful than the opposing party. And that means that if party A gets worse in some regard, it frees party B to be worse in that regard, too.
So it would hardly be shocking if the blatant and growing antisemitism of the Democratic party resulted in the GOP being less diligent about suppressing antisemitism in its own ranks. The more awful the Democratic party becomes, the worse the GOP can be while still seeming LESS awful from the perspective of those who share its public goals!
Compounding this is that the more antisemitic party largely controls the education system, even where the less antisemitic party is nominally in control, and indoctrinates children into its own views.
The GOP will have to fight hard not to sink into that same swamp, but the above dynamic gives it little reason to.
"It's my theory that, having effectively closed off any real prospect of third parties displacing them, the major parties no longer need to actually have a positive appeal. Instead they only need to seem less awful than the opposing party. And that means that if party A gets worse in some regard, it frees party B to be worse in that regard, too."
See also abortion.
Surprise, Brett's theory is that right wing antisemitism — which has always been prevalent — is actually the left's fault!
prevalent only on the extreme fringes
whereas large segments of the left have embraced anti-semitism while the remaining segment of the left has done nothing to denounce the anti-semitism
Brett makes a good comment - I will add the anti-semitism on the right is confined to a small fringe group of extremists and they are not welcomed in the gop. On the other hand, the anti-semitism on the left has become mainstream on the left and rarely if ever denounced by fellow leftists.
Well, I almost choke on this, but good on Cruz for not ignoring the early warning signs it's not unimportant fringe anymore, whatever the status of these young republican leaders.
I hope to god a major pop star doesn't praise Hitler in a song.
Indeed, my point is that there IS a real threat of antisemitism in the GOP, because that "We don't have to be good, just less terrible than the other guys." dynamic demotivates efforts to oppose it.
Aaand Joe finds another area of expertise!
expertise in basic knowledge - something you have shown to lack
Self-proclaimed expertise, you mean.
"anti-semitism on the left has become mainstream on the left"
For instance, the next mayor of NYC.
Also, the "Squad"
It's partly our own fault, I mean killing your Saviour, drinking your babies blood, and we're better looking and more successful.
Frank
The party with the performative nationalism has always been the one the antisemites find a more direct home in. synagogue shootings in 20 They just kept it quiet till Trump allowed them to let their freak flag fly. (see Charlottesville in 2017; synagogue shootings in 2018 and 2019; antisemites at January 06)
This is why the right's decided ADL is some kind of crypto-leftist org - because they kept finding antisemites in the GOP to the point that the GOP needed to work the refs or admit they had a problem.
The left's got the bank shot via Israel; the right's got the direct line.
The main quantitative study I've seen recently is 2023:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10659129221111081
First, nationalism without antisemitism is obviously possible, or else Israel would have to be antisemitic.
The truth is that antisemitism is so widespread that no largish political movement (Save zionism, for obvious reasons.) is going to be totally free of it. The left sure as hell isn't, regardless of being internationalist.
Sadly, if you're looking for an out group to demonize, Jews are just about perfect, so everyone who is looking for one settles on them.
We might have been better situated, though, if we hadn't been so gungho about mass immigration from Islamic countries, which are all antisemitic to an extent you seldom used to see in the US.
Yeah, most things are possible but sociological incentives are what they are.
The fact that your outlier is literally a Jewish nation is kind of a tell, no?
We might have been better situated, though, if we hadn't been so gungho about mass immigration from Islamic countries
If you ever talked to normal American Jews, you'd realize why you're out to lunch.
You're just demonstrating what a false friend the right is. The idea that a good way to combat antisemitism is just differently oriented religious bigotry has been disproven over and over again.
Because bigots don't just stop at one faith. And guess who is inevitably second on that list?
You are just so deep in denial about the link between Islam and antisemitism it's absurd.
You don't understand that some Muslims being antiemetic doesn't mean you should treat all Muslims as likely antisemitic.
Negative generalizations about a large group is literally bigotry.
We're not talking Nazis here - Muslims are a large and diverse group, just like Christians and Jews and Buddhists and Hindus.
I've met far more antisemitic 'Christians' than antisemitic Muslims. I'm a Jew who does some legal work for a local Mosque; but I've had 'Christian' prospective clients tell me they don't want a "Jew Lawyer."
There is variation in all groups.
"Legal work for a local Mosque"??
so you help them get the "Get"??
OK, I know that's a Hebrew thing, but pretty sure they have something similar.
"Get the Get", Get it?
Could be a great Abbot and Costello bit.
"Did you get the "Get"?
"No, I didn't get the "Get" yet"
"Let me know when you've got the "Get""
"I've Got to go and get the "Get""
"3rd Base!!"
Frank
Does anyone have this man’s emergency contact information? We really need to get him some help.
Are these 'Christian' prospective clients in the room with you now?
We might have been better situated, though, if we hadn't been so gungho about mass immigration from Islamic countries, which are all antisemitic to an extent you seldom used to see in the US.
That explains all that right-wing anti-Semitism - all those Muslims joining the GOP.
As I wrote above:
"Compounding this is that the more antisemitic party largely controls the education system, even where the less antisemitic party is nominally in control, and indoctrinates children into its own views."
Anyway the reason the right decided that the ADL is some kind of crypto-leftist org is that they are, and no crypto about it. They're not quite as bad as the SPLC, but they do have a real tendency to call any group that doesn't toe their ideological line 'antisemitic'.
ADL pointing out how many conservative groups are antisemetic is proof that ADL just has an anti-conservative bias!
LOL, perfecto.
I don't always agree with them either, but I'm not so totalizing I dismiss them because they come up with results I disagree with.
"Pointing out" is just "claiming", if you fail to provide evidence.
"ADL is some kind of crypto-leftist org"
No, just leftist. Run by a former Dem operative.
Try the JDL, NOT run by a former Dem operative.
Jonathan Greenblatt
"Jonathan Greenblatt (born November 21, 1970) is an American entrepreneur, corporate executive, and the sixth national director and CEO of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).[1] Prior to heading the ADL, Greenblatt served in the White House as Special Assistant to Barack Obama and Director of the Office of Social Innovation and Civic Participation.
The problem with a "quantitative study" is not what you count, its what you don't count.
Vice President Josh Shapiro could not be reached for comment.
As a Jew who is somewhere to the left of the reform folk, I want to make some points here.
First: Jew =/= Israeli.
Second: Being pro-Israel is not the same thing as being pro-Jew. There are zillions of Christians who have an affinity for dead Jews, especially if death comes during Armageddon. Or live Jews, if we convert.
Third: Being critical of Israel is not the same thing as being antisemitic. I lived in Israel (briefly) in the early '60s. I have very strong feelings for the country. But when Israel either participated in (at worst) or stood by (at best) while the slaughter took place in Sabra and Shatila, I realized that I could not be uncritical of Israel.
Fourth: Being pro-Palestinian rights is not the same thing as being antisemitic. There are principles in Judaism that call for *justice*, and the settlers, in their nationalistic fervor, have abandoned those principles. (Granted there is (constant) debate within Judaism about just about everything.)
Fifth: Palestinian =/= Hamas supporter.
Sixth (and perhaps most important here): The difference between the left and the right is that the left is largely critical of the State of Israel; the right is largely critical of Jews as Jews. The growing association between the right and Christianity (more properly, Christian nationalism) will only exacerbate this situation.
"Sabra and Shatila"??
Haven't heard that Dog Whistle being blown for awhile, and whatever "Slaughter" took place was done by Christians, seriously, when it comes to killing A-rabs, they're the best at it.
Frank
Sure. Surround the neighborhood and let in the 'other' troops to do the killing. That doesn't absolve the IDF, which *could have stopped it*. I was in grad school when it happened, so it left a mark. One of my housemates and I wrote to the Knesset (in our best Hebrew, which wasn't very good, admittedly) in protest.
Wow! your "Strongly worded letter" didn't get a response from a Knesset that still consisted mostly of Horror-cost Survivors???? Did you write the PLO after Munich 1972??? it "Left a mark"??
You're a cartoon character ("Droopy the Dog" sad looking Hound that was always speaking in a sad monotone..
OK, that's where my comparison breaks down, Droopy always won in the end)
Frank
For the new readers, I got "Horror-Cost" from this Taiwanese Pathology Professor (rabid Anti-Communist, who'd a thunk it?) He was really into studying Tay-Sach's Disease (ICD 10 E75.02) and was doing a study on it's incidence in Horror-cost Survivors.
That's how he pronounced it, "Horror-cost" (He also couldn't say "Howell-Jolly Bodies", sometimes we'd ask him about the incidence of Howell-Jolly Bodies in Horror-cost Survivors, like he was some sideshow freak) Like most Pathologists he really belonged in the Lab.
Frank "Here we see a Howorr-Jorry Body in a Horror-Cost Survivor..."
For the new readers: Yes, there is something wrong with this person. There isn’t any special meaning in the poor grammar and spelling. The atrocious jokes are not secret code. It’s just an unwell person.
Hazony here is pandering. Nationalism (except in Israel) by definition is antisemitic, and right wing populism has always been wildly antisemitic, so nobody who actually paid attention to politics could ever have even sincerely believed that it "wouldn't happen on the right."
"Nationalism (except in Israel) by definition is antisemitic"
The very fact that nationalism in Israel isn't antisemitic logically proves that it isn't antisemitic by definition. Only contingently, just like any other political movement. Even one exception disproves such a 'definitional' claim.
No - you try and claim that nationalism has no more antisemitism than any large group would.
But there is a causal connection between nationalism and antisemitism - the solidarity Jews have internally is a threat to national authority. Unless, of course, the state is itself Jewish.
Until you understand that interaction, you're not engaging with the issue.
"Until you understand that interaction"
"Until you agree with me" in other words.
"But there is a causal connection between nationalism and antisemitism - the solidarity Jews have internally is a threat to national authority. Unless, of course, the state is itself Jewish."
That's not 'antisemitism' because the same could be said of ANY cohesive group. And that sort of reasoning only kicks in for authoritarian nationalists.
As it kicks in for authoritarian internationalists, too, and pretty conspicuously. It's not a product of being nationalist, but of being authoritarian, not wanting people to have any loyalties outside of the government.
What you don't want to permit the recognition of, is that nationalism doesn't have to be authoritarian.
Nationalism can be about the ends of government, (Promoting the interests of the citizenry, not humanity in general.) and not the means. There can be limited government nationalism.
National authority is not just the same authority that any cohesive group has!
Solidarity is not alone a threat to authority. Jews were not bucking authority in pre-WW2 Europe. They were bucking *nationalist loyalty.*
Authoritarianism is a red herring.
And your anodyne definition of nationalism is not how anyone else uses the word. Feel free to look up the real definition, though that hasn't stopped you with plenty of other words.
Your problem is that you have an impoverished understanding of the concept of nationalism. In everyday parlance, we use terms like "country" and "nation" and often "state" (when not referring to one of the 50 U.S. subdivisions) interchangeably. But nations and countries are different concepts. E.g., there is a Kurdish nation; there is no Kurdish state. Nationalism is not about putting the interests of one's country above those of other countries.¹ It's about one's nation, not one's country. It gets even more confused in people's minds because typically there is a strong overlap between nations and countries. But Jews have always been outside the relevant nations even while within the countries. Nationalism can tolerate the existence of small ethnic minority nations within a larger nation-state — nobody cares about the Amish, to pick an example — but it cannot tolerate the existence of significant minority groups, particularly ones that have ties to people in other countries, as Jews historically always have had.
¹ Note that every country does that, always has, and always will; those that elevate supranational institutions like the UN or NATO or EU or the like do so because they think the existence of these institutions is ultimately in the interests of their countries.
"Nationalism (except in Israel) by definition is antisemitic"
Does this mean nationalism in Israel is by definition anti-gentile?
In other words, nationalism is always anti- all ethnic and other types of groups, other than some majority or plurality group in the nation in question? So it's also going to be anti-Muslim, anti-Russian, etc.
Genuinely trying to understand the point here. I'd echo what Brett said as well.
Even the Zodiac Killer is right occasionally.
"is"?? thanks for ruining my next California trip.
"Being pro-Israel is not the same thing as being pro-Jew. "
"Being critical of Israel is not the same thing as being antisemitic."
"Being pro-Palestinian rights is not the same thing as being antisemitic."
All true propositions, strictly speaking, as a matter of logic. But,
Being pro-Israel goes along much more naturally with being pro-Jew than with being anti-Jew.
Being critical of Israel goes along much more naturally with antisemitism than philosemitism.
Being pro-Palestinian makes a great cover story if you're antisemitic. Maybe so good you could fool yourself.
I am not so much philosemitic as I am unbiased. I look at the Middle East, and Israel, the Jews, are the only really civilized bunch there. They're not nice, I guess you could say, but they're about as nice as is survivable in that tough neighborhood.
If you plopped Israel down next to Belgium, in a much nicer neighborhood, they'd be quite peaceful. If you dropped Belgium where Israel is? My guess is that they'd be conquered within a couple years, if they didn't buy peace by being good dhimmis.
Being pro-Palestinian makes a great cover story if you're antisemitic. Maybe so good you could fool yourself.
So you're just gonna call that Jewish poster antisemitic?
Maybe Jewish maybe not.
He makes a lot of claims that can't be verified.
Jews have endorsed the next NYC mayor, who thinks the IDF is responsible for NYPD excesses and imaginary Muslim women were the real 9/11 victims. All kinds of nominal Jews.
Most Jews I know are into debate and diversity of perspective.
Not Bob. He sucks.
DOES the (presumptive!) next NYC mayor "the IDF is responsible for NYPD excesses"?
Yes or no?
Can’t parse you here. But I’m sure your tiny quote lacks context.
Mamdani says NYPD boots ‘on your neck’ were ‘laced by the IDF’ in vile video
Of course, this was at that 2023 Democratic Socialists of America convention you insist should be memory holed. Mamdani's memory hole contributions have the incinerator overloaded at this point.
NY Post didn't do better than you.
I mean, NYPD does train with the IDF:
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2012/09/nypd-now-has-an-israel-branch.html
And more of the quote:
""I think that for anyone to care about these issues, we have to make them hyper-local, We have to make clear that when the boot of the NYPD is on your neck, it's been laced by the IDF.
We have to make, not specifically that example all the time, but just to say that, for working class people who have very little time, who have so many stresses, who are under so many pressures, there isn't that much time for symbolism. We have to make it materially connected to their life.
And I think that what opportunity we have is that we are in a country where those connections abound, especially in New York City. You have so many opportunities to make clear the ways in which that struggle over there is tied to capitalist interests over here ... I think these are connections and opportunities we have to take."
If it's too good to be true, maybe Google it a bit.
I'm sure the NY Post will find something he said in grade school that you can run with tomorrow.
Certainly you don't seem interested in his platform!
"diversity of perspective."
Thinking Jews are behind US police violence is not a diversity of perspective, its Jew hating, you putz.
It can be both. Some 'perspectives' just happen to be nasty and delusional.
“nominal Jews.”
Why deflect from this as though you are ashamed.
“I am not so much philosemitic as I am unbiased. I look at the Middle East, and Israel, the Jews, are the only really civilized bunch there.”
You are actually a clown.
I haven't seen more than the normal amount on the right.
The *Left* though - they try to hide it as 'anti-zionism' but they're starting to burst through that facade.
"I haven't seen more than the normal amount on the right."
Left unsaid- what is the normal (and acceptable?) amount of anti-Semitism on the Right?
For those of us who pay attention to the present, the recent past ("THE JEWS WILL NOT REPLCE US!"), the more distant past (the rise of right-wing groups in the United States devoted to anti-Semitism as a uniting force ... well, generally racism, but especially anti-Semitism), and the even more distant past (since forever) ...
The use of a "normal amount" of anti-Semitism ... speaks volumes.
Unfortunately, some people are shocked, SHOCKED I SAY!, to find that this "normal amount" that has always existed ... still exists.
ETA- I will add that I have repeatedly noted that the issues between Palestine and Israel, and more specifically, the alignment between Netanyahu and elements of the US Right, has caused the left to drift away from its former pro-Israel stance. And that has allowed anti-Semitism to spread within groups that are opposed to the actions of Israel. But while this is true, the short-term gains of Netanyahu have come at a very long-term loss for Israel in terms of the formerly unwavering bi-partisan support the country once observed, and that hoping that toadying up to fair-weather friends on the right with a large and vocal anti-Semitic portion by radicalizing others will not end well.