The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
From October 7, 2023 to October 13, 2025
Blessed are You, L-rd our G‑d, King of the Universe, who has granted us life, sustained us and enabled us to reach this occasion.
On the evening of October 6, 2023, the Jewish holiday of Simchat Torah began. This is a joyous holiday, when it is a mitzvah (commandment) to be happy. Jews sing and dance with the Torah, and toast many L'Chaims. While many Jewish holidays can be a bit somber, Simchat Torah is a fun holiday. Hamas no doubt chose this day deliberately. In the early hours of the morning of October 7, people would be scattered, tired, and probably a bit hungover.
In 2024, Simchat Torah began on October 24. (The Jewish calendar follows the Lunar cycle, so dates shift around.) Around the world, Jews tried to be merry, but there was a sadness that those in captivity could not celebrate. We said we would "Dance for them," praying the hostages would soon be released.
On the evening of October 13, 2025, the Jewish holiday of Simchat Torah began again. Now, all of the living hostages have been returned to their families and friends. For the first time in nearly two years, we could celebrate without any restraints or reservations. Tonight's holiday was a joyous one for me, and I'm sure for Jews around the world.
In the summer of 2024, during a mission trip, I watched the surveillance footage of the atrocities of October 7. Many of those gruesome images will forever be burned in my mind. I wasn't sure there could ever be a video that could help reduce the sting.
This video of the hostages being reunited with his family will help. Try to watch this montage without tearing up.
Several of the grieving parents, upon seeing their sons, recited a very well-known Jewish prayer, the Shehecheyanu:
Blessed are You, L-rd our G‑d, King of the Universe, who has granted us life, sustained us and enabled us to reach this occasion.
These parents must have imagined this moment, over and over again, for two years. They no doubt planned what they would say and how they would act. And in the moment, the first words that left their mouths was the prayer to the Almighty, expressing thanks for letting them reach this momentous occasion. These moments should reinforce the faith in all of us.
A few related points.
First, President Trump deserves the eternal thanks of the Jewish people. He accomplished something that I didn't think was possible. In earlier days, I was quite critical of Trump, but over time, I've come to appreciate the singular and transformative talents he possesses. The Israel deal is perhaps his greatest move yet. No other President could have pulled it off.
Second, we can finally lay to rest this slander that Trump is an anti-semitic. Watch his speech before the Knesset (the Israeli Parliament). He gave thanks to the "Almighty G-d of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob." He referred to the Abraham Accords as the Avraham Accords, the way you would pronounce it in Hebrew. He celebrates that his daughter converted to Judaism, and married a Jewish person. Jews throughout Israeli, even those on the political left, celebrated President Trump. I've written before how being a Democrat is part of the American Jewish culture. Fine. I don't expect to change that norm, though I think that political homogeneity is fading.
Third, I don't pretend the road ahead is simple or easy. We can juxtapose the release of the twenty innocent hostage with the release of 2,000 Palestinian prisoners. Families in Gaza and the West Bank celebrated as mass murderers and terrorists were released onto the streets.
Until Palestinian children are no longer taught that Jews are evil and Israel must be destroyed, I am dubious that peace can be sustained. Perhaps a model can be found in another post-war setting. I have a friend whose mother grew up in Japan following World War II. She relayed how a primary goal of America's reconstruction of Japan was to change the culture, and eliminate the belief that Emperor Hirohito was a deity. It was this fanaticism that inspired countless Japanese pilots to fly their Kamikazes into American ships. (My grandfather, Irving Blackman, thankfully survived the attack on the USS Luce.) One of the defining moments of the Reconstruction was when General Douglas MacArthur took a photograph next to Emperor Hirohito. This picture proved that the emperor was not a deity. Indeed, Hirohito was dwarfed by the commanding presence of the general. Japanese people who saw this photo realized at once their fanaticism was misplaced.

I'm not sure what the MacArthur equivalent would be for the Palestinian people, but we need to think about it carefully.
Still, I am thankful. Today is still a momentous start for a process.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
I don't think there could be any MacArthur counterpart in the Muslim world. They'd have to downplay and renounce major parts of the Koran, and who would that be? At least Saudi Arabia and Iran, and probably a dozen more.
I know little of the Koran. Maybe its more barbaric parts are like the Old Testament; mostly ignored as being stories rather literal commands to kill apostates and Jews. But there are very few of even the most literal minded Christians who even talk of stoning adulterers, let alone actually do it, and that's a huge contrast with at least Arab and Persian Muslims. Even the seemingly more moderate Indonesia and neighbor Muslims are more blood thirsty, judging from the occasional stories which are still more frequent than similar Christian stories.
You can't get around the very different origin stories of Christianity and Islam.
Christ died on a cross, Mohamud killed people with a sword. The differences start there, and get worse.
There simply isn't any basis in Islam for peaceful relations with people who aren't of your religion, even your sect of that religion. At most you've got the conquered, and the not yet conquered.
That's something apologists don't get about Hamas. They don't just want to kill Jews. They want to kill EVERYBODY who isn't in their particular sect of Islam. You might not be at the top of their list, but make no mistake, you're on it.
I'm not saying Christianity doesn't have it's dark periods in history, but, fundamentally, Christianity at its worst was a corruption of its Founder's teachings, and for Islam, the corruption of those teachings is when it's at it's best, Muslims get worse as they return to their roots.
We Christians aren't supposed to leave you alone, we're supposed to convert you... by persuasion. And the Muslims aren't supposed to leave you alone, they're supposed to convert you... by the sword if necessary.
Judaism is kind of a mixed bag in this regard, in that it has its violent elements, but as Jews are not out to convert the world, if you leave them alone they're pretty much going to leave you alone. The problem in the Middle east is that they're surrounded by the Muslims.
When Christianity kills people, it's No True Christianity. When Islam kills people, it's True Islam.
You're not an expert on the sociology of faith, you're just a bigot who using the No True Scotsman fallacy to maximize your hatefulness.
How does your logic not demand purges of Muslims in America?
It's bigotry to treat two unequal things as if they're equal. Christianity is centered around a pacificist who was executed by the state. Islam is centered around a pedophile warlord. Unsurprisingly, Islam has had little to offer the world except for violence and pedophilia. The feedback loop is also intensely destructive, in part Islam teaches people to be predators and pedophiles but also Islam naturally attracts people who were already pedophiles and predators. We can't even really be surprised when muslims act as they do, of course the killer pedophile fan club has killer pedophiles in it. It's insanely suicidal to allow immigration from the islamic world to the civilized world. You'll also notice how uni-directional this is. Not a lot of people washing up on Islamic shores, claiming to be refugees, and collecting welfare.
"When Christianity kills people, it's No True Christianity. When Islam kills people, it's True Islam."
You say that sarcastically, but it's still true. You can't get around the different origins of Christianity and Islam. They genuinely ARE different, in exactly that regard. Christ and the Apostles taught. Mohamed waged war.
Christians who look to Christ's example, and seek to be Christ-like, are simply going to behave differently from Muslims who look to Mohamed's example, and seek to be Mohamed-like, because Christ and Mohamed behaved differently!
You can scream "No True Scotsman!" until you're hoarse, and it doesn't change the fact that not everybody is a Scotsman. "No True Scotsman" means that you don't deny membership in a class based on criteria that don't define class membership. It doesn't mean that everything is a member of every class!
"How does your logic not demand purges of Muslims in America?"
It does demand not deliberately increasing the number of Muslims in America, certainly. If somebody's already a citizen, they can't constitutionally be purged, you just have to deal with them somehow.
Your sense of True Christianity and True Islam are faiths personally made up based on vibes from some shallow takes on their founding figures and zero history or sociology.
If somebody's already a citizen, they can't constitutionally be purged, you just have to deal with them somehow.
This sure sounds like you wish you could purge Muslims from America, you just can't.
Islam is a very large and diverse group, and you have pre-judged them all as bad.
That's bigotry no matter how you slice it.
Look, you're not being reasonable here, you're just repeating the party line while ignoring the facts. Islam and Christianity are vastly different in their origins and theology, and you simply can't get away from the fact that Islam was founded by a warlord. Islam's "perfect man" went around killing people, piling up bodies in windrows. And that's not even touching on his, ahem, marital practices.
How many Christian majority democracies are there? How many Muslim majority democracies are there? You actually think that's an accident? Nothing to do with Islam rejecting separation of church and state, and Christianity saying "Render unto Ceasar"?
I swear, multi-culturalists are just brain damaged, you're so committed to treating all cultures equally that your brains dribble out your ears.
You're treating broad-religious like a child playing good guys/bad guys, and then talking to me about reason.
Christianity today, in America, contains racial nationalists, antisemites, tiny cults, large groups, liberal faiths, conservative ones, theocrats, groups that reject politics, people who reject medical science, top-down institutions and broad popular ones.
Any attempt to generalize about it is wrongheaded. So, too, Islam. And Buddhism. And Judaism. They're all too large for you to impose anything on them, much less your childlike worldview.
I don't treat all cultures the same - I talk about American exceptionalism plenty, for instance.
But that strawman isn't even in the ballpark of this discussion!
Christianity and Islam and all the large world religions contain lots of cultures *within themselves*.
You don't bother with that kind of nuance. Bigotry requires reduction.
You decided to hate Islam first, and didn't do a lot of work after that. Even vibes can be raggedy when you know what your outcome's gotta be.
You are dodging the reality that Muslims today kill far more than Christians do. Muslims kill apostates, Christians, and Jews, and I don't mean just the State or the imams, but ordinary civilians. The stories don't show up daily, but they do show up often enough to notice, of some poor sod in the wrong sect getting attacked by villagers. Does Charlie Hebdo ring a bell? Does Queers for Palestine not evoke laughter for being so incongruous because gays are executed daily in Muslim countries?
I ask again, where are your examples of modern day Christians behaving like modern day Muslims in their reactions to non-believers or wrong-believers?
Oh look a lot of correlation and an anecdote.
Now do black people.
Congrats on an even shallower take than Brett.
Congrats on continuing to dodge the question. This isn't bigotry. It's an observation that Muslims in Muslim countries kill more wrong-believers than Christians do in more diverse countries. Muslims celebrate stoning adulterers and apostates. Christians do not.
You're committed to pretending their are simply no fundamental differences between different religions, despite the fact that any idiot can see that they behave differently.
Like I said, brains dribbling out of your ears.
It is a category error to say anything broadly about Muslim behavior generally.
I’m committed to not being a reductive fool and you are committed to open prejudice.
You are committed to dodging the question of why Muslims celebrate killing apostates and wrong-believers, in practice, in today's real world. You pretend that's not worthy of noticing, that noticing it is bigotry, yet refuse to admit it is real. This is not black and white bigotry in a mixed-race society. This is Muslims in a 99% Muslim country killing apostates and wrong-believers and celebrating other Muslims raping, torturing, killing, and beheading babies and grandmothers.
This is you refusing to address reality.
Sarcastr0 40 minutes ago
"I’m committed to not being a reductive fool and you are committed to open prejudice"
A better description is that you are committed to being a reductive tool while disengaging from a broad understanding of history and current facts
Ive told you two different ways why your question is dumb. Got zero engagement from you.
That’s all I need to see.
Well, you're being consistent, anyway. Not only doesn't Antifa exist, neither does Christianity or Islam, apparently.
Sarcastr0, you are literally being a parody here.
You keep taking contingent facts about the world and pretending they're inevitable based on the genetic fallacy. If the only thing we knew about Christianity and Islam were the 21st century, then your conclusions might be reasonable. But at different time periods in history, the "look at the world as it currently is" would lead to very different conclusions about the two religions. And of course the modern democratic world is significantly post-Christian, "Christian majority" INO.
There was a time when Christianity looked worse, and there was a time when Islam looked... well, not better than today, but not as bad relative to Christianity as it does today.
But the direction of the trends wasn't an accident.
the direction of the trends wasn't an accident
Do you even know what the genetic fallacy is?
Islam was founded by a warlord.
I don't think "warlord" is quite accurate. He was a merchant who, after his revelation, became a religious leader and then a conqueror, of course. But when he founded Islam he was still a merchant.
What Christians today are killing apostates and stoning adulterers? This is a question for today, not 500 or 1000 years ago.
We Christians aren't supposed to leave you alone, we're supposed to convert you... by persuasion.
Ah yes. Persuasion.
The fact is, Brett, Christians have killed a lot of people in the name of Christianity. I don't think you get to ignore that just by saying "Jesus was nice!"
And now the Jews want to play.
Also, when do we get to talk about Jesus's hos? Is whoring a Christian virtue?
Was Jesus "nice," really?
Mark Twain makes the interesting point that the invention of Hell was perhaps the worst crime in history. Apparently one can be condemned to eternal damnation for no more than using their (God-given) brain to conclude that Jesus was not divine, and is not their savior.*
This is someone who loves mankind?
*Yes. I know that's an oversimplification and that not all Christians believe that. (IIRC, the Roman Catholic Church has abandoned the absolutist version.) Still, plenty do, including evangelical churches that are popular in the US.
Third, I don't pretend the road ahead is simple or easy. We can juxtapose the release of the twenty innocent hostage with the release of 2,000 Palestinian prisoners. Families in Gaza and the West Bank celebrated as mass murderers and terrorists were released onto the streets.
Frankly, Gaza counts on Israeli mercy and usually gets it. After October 7, Israel should have simply cleansed Gaza of life and moved on. Instead, they took extraordinary measures to minimize civilian casualties while targeting Hamas. As it stands: Israel cannot go back to the status quo where Gaza got to shoot infinite rockets for free with no retaliation into Israel. From now on, every time a Gazan rocket is fired at Israel, an Israeli rocket should be fired into Gaza, and they should show the exact same lack of care for civilian casualties that Gaza does. Gaza's constant genocidal aggression must be dealt with accordingly.
If mercy consists of not doing things that are worse than even the Nazi's did, then sure.
It's always ironic when somebody brings up the Nazis this way, without noting that Hamas are, literally, Middle Eastern Nazis.
Hamas is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, founded by Amin al-Husayni, a pal of Hitler's. There would be no Hamas today, if we had only properly de-Nazified the Middle East after WWII, the way we did Europe.
Why would I need to bring this up. As far as I know that's not in dispute. It's also not relevant for TextFirst's insane suggestions.
What you choose to not bring up says as much as what you do choose to bring up.
How is "if they fire a rocket at us, let's fire a rocket at them" an insane suggestion? Like, seriously, how did it come to be that civilized people are just supposed to submit to being bombarded by muslims and not retaliate? A rocket for a rocket, and with our industrial capacity they'll run out before we do.
It's an insane suggestion because it lets Hamas dictate the pace and nature of Israel's response, and they'll do it to maximize the PR damage to Israel.
Targeted responses are better.
Going to have to disagree there a bit. The Soviets started and funded the Palestinian Liberation Army, which later rebranded itself the Palestinian Liberation Organization. Before that there was very little thought of Palestine being a Nation. After the death of Arafat a section broke off of the PLO and became Hamas. The Soviet Union never seems to get it's share of the credit for the World's problems. I'm pretty sure that's because the radicals of the 60's and 70's who have co-opted the Democratic Party were funded and supported by guess who? The Soviets.
I like the boldness of people who can confidently just make shit up. Arafat died in 2004. Hamas was founded in 1986, and was not formed by "breaking off" from the PLO.
Nor does the 21st century Democratic Party have any relation to "radicals of the 60's and 70's," who are largely dead by now.
Israel could have cleaned out Gaza in under 100 days if it had acted like the Allied Forces in WW2. Cut off all food, water, and electricity into Gaza. Use large munitions and incendiaries without warning indiscriminately on any area where enemy forces were found.
War is evil and we should take all reasonable efforts to avoid it. But it only takes one side to make war; all sides have to work to maintain peace.
Or we could just try not to be evil.
Martinned!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Long time, no See, thought maybe you'd gotten the
"1 Hour Martinn-izing" service at the Saudi Embassy ala Jamal Khashoggi.
Oh, did I mention your King is a no-good-child-diddling-Homo??
I'm not even sure which King your King is? are you Belgium? Luxemberg? Dutch?
Doesn't matter they're all related, thats why they look the way they do.
Frank
Shorter TextFirst: "There's nothing wrong with genocide as long as it targets the right people."
Who said anything about genocide? They fire a rocket at us, then we should fire a rocket at them. The old way where Gaza just fired rockets with no retaliation is in part what led them to escalate. We have to teach them that their actions have consequences.
Israel has routinely retaliated for Hamas rocket attacks. They just haven't done so by deliberately killing random Gazans, as you propose.
Attend to Raymond Ibrahim YT channel on Islam.
Blessed are You, L-rd our G‑d, King of the Universe, who has granted us life, sustained us and enabled us to reach this occasion.
Why is God blessed for killing so many Jews on October 7?
You seem exceptionally retarded today.
Well done?
I'm not the one giving an imaginary tooth fairy credit for one thing without asking questions about another thing. The Flying Spaghetti Monster (hbhn) is omnipotent or not.
You're right. You're not.
You are, however, a complete twat and that's not imaginary.
Kudos for making it seem so effortless.
Why does the Great Pasta, may all bless their great taste, have to be omnipotent?
Beats me.
Your Pederaster King does what?
"imaginary tooth fairy"
LOL You believe there is international "law". Speaking of imaginary.
Did the ICJ and ICC have any effect on the war? Even the Euros hardly paid any attention to them or changed their behavior.
The carrot and the stick of recognition and peace plan seem to have worked pretty well.
And let's see whether any of the accused Palestinian or Israeli war criminals ever see the inside of a prison cell here in The Hague. Perhaps the only reason why Netanyahu won't end up here is because he'll end up in an Israeli prison instead, which is fine with me.
The "recognition " by feckless former powers had nothing to do with it, except maybe give Hamas false hope.
Trump leveraged the "illegal" IDF attack on Qatar to get Qatar to get Hams to agree to release of the hostages and IDF control of most of the strip. Europe had zero to do with it.
Did you see how Trump treated Stamer yesterday? Shows what "recognition" had to do with anything.
Tone deaf isn't even close to how pathetic that is as a comment on this post.
God didn't kill any Jews on October 7.
He didn't? He sure didn't do anything to stop them being killed, and I'm not sure why that's a distinction that matters.
You get your kings (redacted) on your keyboard?
Hamas is already getting busy killing Palestinians in Gaza. No doubt many of the terrorists and murderers freed will be put to use in Gaza killing Gazans who spoke out against Hamas
Yes, which is why it would have been better to negotiate a comprehensive peace plan instead of hand waiving in the general direction of a wish list.
Of course, you can't do that without having the Palestinians at the table...
Why would hit have been better to negotiate something imaginary? Because you like living in your imagination?
All peace plans are imaginary until they are agreed. (As are indeed all laws.)
If you negotiate a comprehensive peace plan between Israel and the Palestinians you can slot in a non-Hamas government in Gaza to replace the occupying forces of the IDF. Now there is a power vacuum that only Hamas can fill.
And peace plans negotiated with the Palestinians typically remain imaginary.
They do at this rate, yes.
A settlement was imposed on Hamas by the US with the consent of Qatar and Turkey, coerced or bribed to agree.
Classic power politics.
Yes, and it turns out that when you do that you don't necessarily get the outcome you expect, particularly when you don't know WTF you're doing.
Watching the Executions in Gaza (Arab Terrorists executing other Arab Terrorists), when was the last one in Israel?
Maybe the "2 State Solution" isn't so bad after all.
If I was a Palestinian in Israel, don't think I'd want to go back.
Frank
Religion is a scourge against humanity.
From
June 5 1967to ???It's morally convenient to be able to call even the POWs "terrorists and murderers." You obviously have a hatred of Palestinians comparable to their hatred of you. It's understandable, but you may want to consider that your view of the overall conflict just might be a little biased.
POW stands for Prisoner of War. Believe it or not, War has rules. Israel would have been with in their rights if they would have executed those "terrorists and murders". There was never a Declaration of War by either Government. So under International Law there was no war.
Wait, if it wasn't a war, what was it? Are the Palestinian sympathizers right when they say that the Israeli army invaded and simply kidnapped all those people? I don't think that's right but...
Execution by proper legal means, right?
There would be "rules" there too.
"War" or not, there are rules in place here.
Hey Martinned, your King called, wants you over pronto for his "Usual".
Might want to hurry, you know how prickly Kings get when they have to wait.
Frank
Anyone notice all the Israeli Hostages are Karen Carpenter Skinny, while the Palestinian Prisoners look like JB Prick-ster? almost like one side didn't feed their Prisoners while the other side did.
Frank
I agree with Josh that it's unfair to label Trump as anti-Semitic. Trump has been a viciously anti-Black racist for literally 50 years or more. He's been virulently racist against Hispanics. And racist against Muslims and many other people of color.
But it's absolutely not fair to automatically jump from these many many examples of racism and prejudice to anti-semitism. I genuinely do agree with Josh. The evidence is simply not there. So, this will be one of the rare cases where I'm perfectly happy to defend (a) Josh, and (b) Trump.
If Trump were walking past a lake, and he saw a black child, a Muslim child, a Latino child, a Jewish child, a trans child--all drowning . . . he'd definitely stick out a pole, nudge the Jewish child away from all the others, and then use that pole to pull that Jewish child in to safety. 🙂
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_and_antisemitism
Let me know when he signs an Execution Warrant (that was carried out) on a Retarded Black Man like a certain Arkansas Governor did, when he was running for POTUS, so he wouldn't get "Willie Hortoned" like Michael Do-Cock-us did.
Oh, and the "Willie Horton Ad"??? first used by the AlGore Cam-pain (and I do mean "pain")
Sleepy Joe? OK he did push the "Crime Bill" that put much longer sentences for the Crack than the powder Cocaine most White Peoples preferred back then.
And our first 1/2 Black POTUS? Barry Hussein Osama?? He's the only POTUS you can find on Youtube saying the actual "N-word" (There's over 2,000 of Nixon tapes, he doesn't say it once)
Frank
I've said many times that Trump is a casual antisemite. (I think he's generally a casual racist, too.) By that I mean that he holds stereotyped, often quite negative, views of Jews (and other minorities) as groups, but doesn't hate them as individuals.
("Trump can't be an antisemite because Ivanka converted" or "…because he read a pro-Jewish speech in Israel" are just such stupid arguments, though.)