The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
"Oyster Bay Caves, Agrees to Pay $3.95M and Approve Mosque's Plans After 'Fake Grandma' Scandal"
N.Y. Post (Brandon Cruz) reports:
Under the agreement, the town will green-light the Masjid Al-Baqi mosque's submitted plan to demolish two one-story buildings and build a larger house of worship, repeal a 2022 parking law that more than doubled space requirements for houses of worship, and pay nearly $4 million in damages and attorneys' fees….
From an earlier article (also by Brandon Cruz):
Town Planning Board Chairman Angelo Stanco admitted in a deposition that Oyster Bay "departed from its normal practice" to "invent the fake witness" — something he said had never been done before. He said the grandma is "partially an amalgam of testimony and written submissions," the records show….
Typically, the approval process to get the permit that the mosque is seeking only takes roughly six months to a year. But the mosque, which has existed in the town since the 1990s, said they have been fighting for their approval for over six years at this point.
And from the Justice Department's April 2025 statement of interest expressing support for the mosque, filed before the fake grandma revelations:
Plaintiffs … claim that Defendants … have, among other things, violated the equal terms provision of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 ("RLUIPA"), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc et seq. As set forth in Plaintiffs' complaint and motion for a preliminary injunction, the Town has denied MOLI's application for a permit to construct a mosque capable of meeting the needs of its congregants in Bethpage, New York, relying on a recently revised parking code requiring MOLI to construct more parking spaces than is feasible.
As set forth below, in the United States' view, Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their RLUIPA equal terms claim1 because, under the recently revised parking code, MOLI is treated less favorably than comparable secular uses such as theaters, libraries, and museums, and the Town cannot and does not show that such unequal treatment is justified.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"He said the [fake] grandma is 'partially an amalgam of testimony and written submissions.'" Love it.
Yes, but if you continue to read the article, it turns out that they also lied about that (or don't know what the word "amalgam" means):
An amalgam is "a mixture or blend." You can't mix things that never existed in the first place.
Yawn, I've seen towns do a lot worse...
FWIW Oyster Bay is notoriously corrupt
They seem rather incompetent at it.
And now more so with a mosque - a hotbed of anti-Christian terrorist degenerates disguised as a "religion". There is no legitimacy in the Muslim "faith" when it calls for war, death, or force upon every other "real" religion. Nurism could be the only acceptable 'faith'.
Nurism
Weird deep cut for a bigot to turn out. I presume he's actually heard someone who practices that, so he can't just make it up.
[If I didn't have Muslim co-workers back in my lawyer days, I do wonder what kind of conclusions I'd have drawn over time.
Even knowing intellectually there are billions of Muslims, confirmation bias can be a helluva drug.]
There is no legitimacy in the Muslim "faith" when it calls for war, death, or force upon every other "real" religion.
That's pretty much where Christianity was a few centuries ago.
So is Angelo Stanco still Town Planning Board Chairman? He just cost the city a ton of money by his fraud. TR would give him a good thrashing.
The court is letting the town off easy. Manufacturing evidence, even in an internal civil context, is quite serious. It is fraud.
From the NY Post story:
Um… ????? It's been 40 years since I took calculus, but I don't think that's right.
And the icing on the irony cake: