The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Trump Cruelly Terminates Program for Legal Migrants Fleeing Communist Tyranny, and Seeks to Deport them
The Administration ended the CHNV "parole" program for 530,000 migrants from four Latin American nations, including three ruled by authoritarian socialist regimes. They will soon be subject to deportation.

Yesterday, the Trump Administration terminated legal "parole" status for some 530,000 legal migrants who entered the United States under the CHNV program, which allowed residents of four Latin American countries - Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela - to live and work in the US for up to two years if they passed a background check and had a US-resident sponsor willing to provide financial support. These people will be subject to deportation, as of April 24.
The termination of CHNV parole is a further expansion of Trump's cruel campaign against legal immigration. In this case, it targets for deportation hundreds of thousands of people who fled horrific communist tyranny in Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, and now risk being deported back to it. There was a time when American conservatives saw themselves as opponents of socialism and welcomed those fleeing it. No longer.
The revocation of parole will also needlessly deprive the US economy of tens of thousands valuable workers and entrepreneurs. Hispanic immigrants, like those from other countries, disproportionately contribute to various types of innovations and businesses startups. Given the horrors that await them in their countries of origin, I expect many of the CHNV migrants will try to remain in the US illegally rather than "self-deport." If so, they will be less productive than before (as they could only work black market jobs). And the administration's policy will actually increase the number of illegal migrants, rather than reducing it.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt claims "[t]hese are the 530,000 illegal immigrants that Joe Biden flew to the United States on the taxpayers dime." Every word of this is false. There were no flights "on the taxpayers dime." The migrants either paid for their own transportation or did so with the help of their sponsors.
And the CHNV program was entirely legal. I summarized the reasons why in a 2023 article criticizing a lawsuit filed against it by a group of GOP-led state governments:
The legal basis for these private sponsorship programs is the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, which, as later modified, gives the Department of Homeland Security the power to use "parole" to grant foreign citizens temporary residency rights in the United States "on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit." Here, we have both "urgent humanitarian reasons" and "significant public benefit."
The humanitarian need is undeniable. Three of the four nations included in the program — Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela — are ruled by oppressive socialist dictators, whose policies have created horrific conditions. Few have put it better than Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R), whose state is one of the plaintiffs in the present case.
As he said last year, Venezuela's socialist president Nicolas Maduro is a "murderous tyrant" who "is responsible for countless atrocities and has driven Venezuela into the ground." Venezuelan oppression and socialist economic policies have created the biggest refugee crisis in the history of the Western hemisphere, with some 7 million people fleeing. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R), whose state is spearheading the lawsuit, has also noted the severe economic crisis in Venezuela, which he (rightly) blames on socialism.
In 2021, DeSantis rightly described Cuba's communist regime as responsible for "poverty, starvation, migration, systemic lethal violence, and suppression of speech." Cuba's government continues to be highly repressive, including recent brutal suppression of protests in July 2021.
Nicaragua, under the increasingly authoritarian socialist rule of Daniel Ortega, is a similar story. That's why many Nicaraguans have sought to flee. As one Nicaraguan human rights activist puts it, conditions are so bad that migrants fleeing the country say "[t]hey'd rather die than return to Nicaragua…"
Haiti has long been one of the poorest and most dysfunctional societies in the world. Over the last year, conditions have gotten even worse, with intensifying violence and shortages of basic necessities.
If conservatives mean what they say about the evils of socialism, they cannot simultaneously deny that people fleeing communist tyranny have "urgent humanitarian reasons" for seeking freedom elsewhere. When we deport victims of communism back to the tyrannies they fled, we become complicit in that oppression and lose credibility in condemning it. The situation in Haiti is also indisputably dire, albeit for somewhat different reasons.
In the article, I also explain how the program created the "significant public benefit" of reducing pressure on the border. It could have done so to an even greater extent if not for the arbitrary 30,000 per month numerical cap imposed by the Biden Administration. I went over the legal issues in greater detail in an amicus brief I filed in the case on behalf of myself, the Cato Institute, and MedGlobal. Ultimately, a conservative Trump-appointed federal judged handpicked by the plaintiff states dismissed the case because he concluded the states' lacked "standing" for reasons that undercut their substantive arguments, as well.
Trump's revocation of CHNV parole is a dark day for victims of communism - and for America. The administration's cruel actions victimize people fleeing the sort of tyranny conservatives most claim to oppose, tarnishes America's image in the war of ideas against authoritarian states, and damages the US economy - all for no good reason.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It’s because they’re nonwhite. Nothing else matters to the Trump Administration.
And thus it will remain as we see further cancellations/ deportations. The only exception might be (as has been mentioned) Ukrainians fleeing the war there, and that would be as a favor to Putin.
Venezuelans and Cubans are mostly white, Haitians are black, Nicaraguans are more often mestizo. Race doesn't seem to have much to do with it.
These distinctions are lost on Trump.
Deport them and alot more. Good with it.
In Trump's view, these are shithole countries. That's all that matters to him.
"Askually Cubans are white Hispanics so it's ok to be shitty to them" isn't the defense you think it is.
The census may consider them white, but they are still a separate ethnic group.
The only reason they were brought here by Biden is because they're nonwhite.
They weren't brought here, they came here because they were fleeing communist dictatorships.
If you actually cared about individual liberty you would welcome them. But of course you don't.
They were brought here to puff up census numbers for blue areas and expand benefits recipients and enshrine the blue State in perpetuity.
whatever
Dan wanted to trot out old posts and say there are all male but he ralizes that Trump has put more women in high postions than did his beloved genius Biden.
Dan thinks Vance is not as smart or experienced as Kamala -- yeah, that sinks you right there, Dan.
And finally we have Dan's old blind spot: He has never realized that from the time of Plessy v Ferguson (150 years ago) that race (White) is controlled by government definition. Dan' thinks the whole world must accept Dan's view of what 'white ' is.; It doesn't and hasn't for a long long time.
Oh, Dan, by the way, Plessy was whiter than Taylor Swift --- look it up
My ex left the USSR as a religious refugee in 1984. Her family flew out of Moscow to Vienna where they declared their intent where they were transferred to Rome and the US government was informed . They spent close to 6 months there before their paperwork was processed and they were admitted to the US. When they landed they already had a green card in hand. That's how it's supposed to work.
These people are here legally. They came the way it's supposed to work.
For 630 days -- and then they go home, that was the deal.
Just legalize the otherwise illegals. Problem solved for everybody. Why won't cruel trump meet us halfway in this generous compromise?
No one in this thread said that.
I'm surprised David hasn't appeared with his usual "But they aren't illegal!" crap.
They aren't illegal.
There he is!
Because that does great violence to the word compromise.
Even Biden would laugh in your face (now)
June 4, 2024
Press Release
Today, President Joe Biden unveiled new policies via executive order intended to limit illegal immigration at the southern border.
“For months, President Biden claimed he did not have the executive authority to secure the border and end the crisis he created. Because of his failure, over 8 million people from around the world have illegally entered the country. His actions today will not stop the devastating border crisis he created. President Biden should reverse his failed executive actions, reinstate Remain in Mexico, build the border wall, and enforce the law,”
It's clear Trump has no moral or policy convictions. His goals are simply to undo the achievements of those who opposed him and to inflict as much cruelty as he can on those who antagonized him.
Or, he's doing what Americans want him to do. To take out the trash. Most of these low IQ peasants will never be good Americans, nor are their genes capable of producing good Americans.
That you equate people from Latin America as people with "low IQ" gives away the ballgame, buddy.
Also I almost certainly have a higher IQ than you. Can I demand you be deported?
Nick W B : "Also I almost certainly have a higher IQ than you. Can I demand you be deported?"
For that matter, you probably both have a higher IQ than Trump (his uncle at MIT notwithstanding). Can he be deported?
Speaking of taking out the trash . . . you are now muted.
So are you.
The reason I don't mute you, Dr. Ed 2, is because of your entertainment value. I'm not alone when I say I can't wait to read your "dissertation".
Another asshole to add to the growing population here at the VC.
It’s the same guy.
You see your own hate in Trump. As St Augustine said "we see what we are" Boasberg's daughter works keeping illegal immigrants away from the law. Now, you are defending conflict of interest because of your blind rage.
Any chance you can write about something other than Trump, Ilya. We know your position ... and you are losing any credibility for impartial analysis.
Half a million in such a short amount of time is a pretty decent bite of our population. Turn the wheel a few more times and pretty soon the original population will be dominated/displaced. Which I suppose is the actual goal of Ilya and the Dems.
Yet, the "Great Replacement" is a racist conspiracy theory. The fact that they're doing it and not even hiding it is lost on these people.
It is not. There are about 330,000,000 in the country, so half a million is a bit more than one tenth of one percent.
What does that even mean? In what way does letting in a Cuban refugee "displace" you?
You. . . you came to Reason dot com looking for impartial analysis? That's the funniest thing I've heard all day. It would be less dumb if Reason, the VC, or Simon claimed to be impartial but they do quite the opposite. You scored on your own goal there.
Eugene typically does a good job of maintaining impartiality (and, hence, credibility).
Somin never had any credibility. He takes the Marxist anti-American side of every issue.
Why is letting people stay who are fleeing Communist persecution, Marxist?
I think you may be the first person on this blog to accuse Professor Somin of having pretenses of impartiality on this issue. I think he has an extremely solid defense against the charge. In all candor and fairness to him. I doubt he has ever once said anything in the history of this blog to justify such a harsh indictment on your part. He is entirely innocent. He has done nothing to warrant the reputation for credible impartiality you malignly accuse him of having.
You should apologize. A totalitarian he is absolutely not. He is completely inmocent of totalitarianism. He is about as much a partialitarian as they come.
If its so cruel not to have it why did this program only come into being in the Biden Administration? Were Obama and Bush as evil as Trump? Y'all are acting as if this was around since the Founding Fathers.
Also where is the rest of the world in all of this? If its such a moral imperative that all these people find another place to live why can't any other country open the door? Why is it all on the US as the only place in the world to go? Why isn't Ilya turning his ire on all these other places? They're wagging their finger at US instead of opening their own doors. Pretty weird isn't it?
Other countries have taken large numbers of Venezuelan refugees. Columbia, Peru, and Brazil have all taken more than the US (Colombia has taken more than 4 times as many as we have), and Chile, Spain, Ecuador, Argentina, Mexico, and the Dominican Republic have each taken more than 100,000. I suspect other countries would be willing to take more as well, but presumably the refugees want to go to a place where there's a large Spanish-speaking population.
Typical nonsense from Ilya. Article from Oct 4, 2024
U.S. won't extend legal status for 530,000 migrants who arrived under Biden program
The Biden administration will not be extending the legal status of hundreds of thousands of migrants who were allowed to fly to the U.S. under a sponsorship program designed to reduce illegal border crossings, the Department of Homeland Security announced Friday.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/venezuelans-legal-status-chnv-program/
C'mon man. That was a month before the election. It wasnt intended to be taken seriously.
“There were no flights ‘on the taxpayers dime.’ The migrants either paid for their own transportation or did so with the help of their sponsors.” Is this a joke? The corrupt Biden regime was admittedly flying illegals into this country, but that’s ok, because, of course, the illegals were paying for their own tickets. Uh huh. B followed by S. It was an insane open borders on steroids policy and the illegals funneled into the country were not buying their own airline tickets off Kayak or Expedia. It was all directly or indirectly government funded.
Once again, you racist POS: they are by definition not illegal.
The target beneficiaries of this categorical parole program were illegals. The statutory authority authorizes only temporary grants on a case by case basis. So, a program directed at illegals that exceeds powers under immigration laws. We call that illegal crazy Dave.
This is not even coherent. Unlike racist POS, "illegal" is not an inherent status of a person. One cannot be "illegal" unless one comes to the U.S. without permission (or overstays one's permission). Since literally zero of these people did that, none. of. them. are. illegal.
Again, the illegal alien population were the intended beneficiaries of Biden's illegal categorical parole program. The goal was to make it appear illegal crossings were down by simply using taxpayer resources to fly the illegals into the country and thereby claim the mass of new aliens were not, by virtue of that illegal subsidized process, illegals. By crazy Dave's logic, we could eliminate crime by just having the police help the criminals commit crime and escape.
By the bot's logic, if you give a panhandler $10, he can be charged with theft because under other circumstances he might have stolen $10.
I'll try to use smaller words: to be "illegal," someone must have broken an immigration law. What specific statute did these people violate?
To Ilya's demented mind the government funding, in entirety, NGOs to pay for the flights is "not government funded" because they added another layer of waste and overhead. He's too blinded by the fairytale ideology to examine reality and act accordingly, instead he lies to force the world he wishes existed.
If they'll stay illegally, what else will they do illegally?
Eating Cats? Eating Dogs?
Is that illegal?
Actually, yes. Cruelty to animals statutes.
"Cruelty to animals statutes" do not, of course, ban eating animals. Not until PETA gets elected.
"Here, we have both "urgent humanitarian reasons" and "significant public benefit.""
I think the phrase is overused. Urgent humanitarian reasons should be reserved for genocide and mass starvation---not that you find yourself in a shithole country that violates your rights. You should be there fighting against that corrupt regime, not fleeing it. The US is not the world's dumping ground.
The "significant public benefit" is laughable. It takes pressure off the border. So we just let them in instead of them crashing the gates. That is bowing to mob mentality.
This is why Trump keeps winning. He and the American people are tired of these excuses about why we have to allow hundreds of thousands of people into this country at all times.
Right, there are no urgent humanitarian reasons, and no public benefit.
Cruelly!
(Any termination of immigrant legal status would be described this way by Somin, which makes such descriptions meaningless. It's the mirror of American Firster reflexive rhetoric.)
For any new readers of the Volokh Conspriacy, Ilya is an Open Borders Extremist who opposes any limits on immigration whatsoever. He is neither a principled nor rational actor.
That is correct. Plus, he has Trump Derangement Syndrome. Plus, he is an immigrant himself with no allegiance to the USA.
Too gutless to say what you really want to say, "and he's Jewish"?
Yes, he is an anti-American Russian Jew. He goes beyond typical Jewish Leftism.
Does 530,000 people really count as a "case-by-case basis"? I'm not sure.
The USA is not the world's life boat. We are $36T+ in debt. We have to fix our own house before we accept people who bring little if any improvement to Team America. This means prioritizing immigrants with needed skills.
More than $36T -- don't forget SS...
I would be happy to trade:
*no income tax
*unversal school choice
* significantly reduced social security and Medicare benefits (for those under 50 who will retire more than 15 yrs from now)
* Significantly reduced regulations
for:
* no fault immigration.
People who come here and work, I have no problem with.
But they cant be on social services or govt housing.
The flip side: trades jobs/unskilled labor are disfavored. We cant build housing because of umpteen regulations. And we cant build / renew houses in places like baltimore or chicago because the school system sucks (no school choice)
We are $36T+ in debt.
Therefore bringing in people who are a net economic benefit is good policy.
Didn't Obama declare Cuba a democracy?
Reagan tried to deal with Nicaragua and the Dems wouldn't let him.
No, Obama didn….wait, is this more dissertation previews?
And Reagan committed crimes against Nicaragua, don't forget.
The Biden administration announced last October that it was terminating the program. (Granted, it was probably a cynical election-related announcement that would have been reversed had the election gone differently). The program is designed to provide a "case-by-case" review, not the blanket approval of 500,000+ applicants. Some 1000 of the same "sponsors" are sponsoring some 300,000 of the applicants. It is uncertain whether some of these sponsors are even real people. As one might imagine, like all things done by the Biden administration, the intensive case-by-case review consisted of no review at all, not even a cursory one.
The dubious legality of the use of the program in such a way aside, two years for a "parolee" to pursue other immigration channels means two years, not, as Somin would have it, a permanent license to stay in the country indefinitely with zero obligation to do anything further.
Here is Somin himself noting Biden's cancellation of the program last October:
https://reason.com/volokh/2024/10/05/biden-foolishly-decides-not-to-extend-legal-status-for-migrants-who-entered-the-us-under-the-chnv-private-sponsorship-program/
So… you admit that Prof. Somin — contrary to people who complain he's just reflexively anti-Trump — is consistent and non-partisan in his criticisms.
And what's the point here, that Trump somehow feels himself bound to continue Biden's policies? Is that a general position Trump takes with respect to other programs and issues?
It is a temporary program. Says that right in the program title.
Time is up. Go home.
What is the problem?
The problem is that Prof. Somin seemingly thinks that people outside of the United States have an unlimited right to be present in the United States, and people from certain countries have a doubly unlimited right.
Therefore, anything that casts doubt on their (doubly) unlimited right to be here is cruel.
This is a legal issue AFTER it is a moral issue.
We saw under Carter (Cuba) and under Clinton (Fort Chaffee) that US took in murderers, perverts and psychos because some dictator played the humanitarian card.
When your familly is murdered by Tren de Aragua you will wake up to what a fool you've been. "oh, the poor guys just need therapy"
Have you fotgotten this picture https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSF_kIWAlwHX9VVmaeOCE9aIgq6FxCesV3gew&s
That was Pelosi calling a gang of murderers 'cute'
They would be shot if they came within a block of her house.
Capitalism sucks, guys.
Trump is doing these people a favor by sending them back to the Socialist Paradises they so wrongly fled.
Now, go be illegal somewhere else. I hear Cost Rica is beautiful.
They weren't illegal here.
Correct.
That is a future state if they don't voluntarily leave or otherwise stay beyond the time limit.
Again, Costa Rica is lovely or so I hear.
The sociopathy of the cultists well in evidence. If Trump suggested putting these 530,000 in cattle cars, you lot would be falling over yourselves to help load them.
I don't know if Brett's reading this thread, but perhaps if he does it will help illuminate for him that — regardless of what he personally claims to believe — for his fellow travelers, the issue isn't illegal immigration. These people just hate immigrants.
LOL!
Ok. Every one of my great-grandparents was an immigrant.
I'm glad they (or their family) made the decision to come here.
Even if it was to Minnesota.
The issue isn't immigration. It's illegal immigration and the last administration's collusion with it. And now things are happening on many different fronts to combat it and correct it. And you don't like it. And I don't care.
Parole was intended by Congress to be used in individual cases with special circumstances, for example to let someone stay in the country for a period to testify in a criminal case, or in a medical emergency, and other special situations that require some extra stay. Please look into this history a bit, because Biden's broad expansive use of it was completely outside the law as intended. Biden never really had this power, but his use went virtually uncontested. For the author to now call it cruel to rescind this unlawful use is preposterous. Center for Immigration Studies discusses this at length and can provide more detail.
You have to be cruel to be kind.
In the right measure.
Why would we want to bring half a million communists here?
Right...the West Germans should have been the ones shooting the East Germans coming over the Berlin Wall!