The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Authorship Predictions for the October Sitting
It is never too early to make predictions!
During the October sitting, nine cases were argued. With this lineup, it is likely that each Justice will have one opinion. Five of those cases have already been decided.
Justice Kavanaugh wrote Williams v. Reed. Justice Kagan wrote Royan Canin. Chief Justice Roberts wrote Lackey v. Stinnie. Justice Sotomayor wrote Glossip v. Oklahoma. Justice Jackson wrote Bouarfa v. Mayorkas.
Four cases remain to be decided: VanDerStock, Medical Marijuana v. Horn, Bufkin v. McDonough, and San Francisco v. EPA.
Back in January, I offered this prediction:
Fourth, we can already start to make predictions about the assignment of cases. There were nine cases argued during the October sitting. Presumably, each Justice will have one case from that sitting. Two cases have been decided so far from that sitting. Justice Kagan wrote Royal Canin, and Justice Jackson wrote Bouarfa, an immigration case. If I had to guess, the top two candidates to write Royal Canin would be the two procedure professors: Kagan or Barrett. Kagan got Royal Canin, which was argued on October 7. VanDerStock was argued on October 8. The only liberal left to write is Justice Sotomayor. And I do not think the Chief would give her that case. I have a sinking feeling Barrett has VanDerStock, which is at bottom a statutory interpretation case. (I say sinking because I was counsel on that case, and attended oral argument.) Then again, we may never know how that case turns out, if the Trump ATF and DOJ take a new position. If that happens, we can check at the end of the term if Barrett doesn't write an opinion for October.
I think it is even more likely that Justice Barrett has VanDerStock.
That leaves Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch for the remaining three cases. My uninformed speculation: Gorsuch has Medical Marijuana (he is from the Mile "High" City and he has written opinions about truckers before), Thomas has Bufkin, the Veterans Claim case, and Alito has San Francisco.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Well maybe Sam Alito and the family of ex-SF Mayor Joe Alioto share some roots in Southern Italy / Sicily
Wow, talk about your inside baseball!
You know, Professor Somin might make some serious money if he monetized some of his proclivities. He might, for example, set up a prediction market (an establishment formerly known as a betting parlor) based on various outcome features of future Supreme Court cases - result, number for and against, individuals on each side, who authors opinions, etc.
As in other prediction markets, the house would make its money by taking a small percentage off the top of each bet - er, the investment in each prediction. It would need to set up initial odds, then the odds would be continuously adjusted to reflect the money bet - er, invested.
Professor Blackman might be able to make some serious money. And if he does, ReaderY wants a small cut of the gross profits - say, 2.5% - for giving Professor Blackman the idea.