The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
The Penis Pancake
From Florida Administrative Law Judge Gary Early's Oct. 31 recommended order in Turnage v. Bob Evans Restaurant, LLC, considering the question "Whether Respondent discriminated against Petitioner in a place of public accommodation due to his race or sex through an act of sexual harassment in violation of section 760.08, Florida Statutes":
On January 3, 2024, Petitioner, through his counsel, Bernard R. Mazaheri, filed a Charge of Discrimination with the Florida Commission on Human Relations (FCHR) alleging that Respondent, Bob Evans Restaurant, LLC, discriminated against him by serving him a pancake "shaped into a penis and balls." {A photograph of the pancake was included in the Charge of Discrimination. Unless Petitioner was advised that it was intended to depict a penis, it could just as easily be a pancake-based representation of an elephant, or when viewed from a different angle, the capitol building of the state of Florida.} …
Petitioner, through his counsel, chose to invoke the jurisdiction of DOAH to contest the decision by FCHR that being served a pancake allegedly in the shape of a penis did not rise to an actionable case of discrimination. Respondent joined the fray by having its counsel make an appearance as a qualified representative.
One might conclude that two attorneys, both presumably bound by canons of professional conduct, would pay attention to a notice setting a hearing in a case they brought or participated in. Here, that did not occur. Instead, the parties, and their counsel, decided it to be appropriate to ignore the hearing, thus wasting the time of the presiding Administrative Law Judge and the court reporter, and allowing the taxpayer dollars used to pay both to be wasted. Despite having knowledge of these proceedings, the parties, through their counsel, failed to comply with the Notice of Hearing or the Order of Pre-Hearing Instructions, and failed to appear at the final hearing.
Based on Petitioner's failure to appear and offer evidence, there is no evidentiary basis on which findings can be made that Bob Evans Restaurant engaged in any discriminatory conduct….
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
You eat at a Bob Evans you deserve to get a pancake shaped like a Penis and Balls.
Frank "That isn't creamer"
I would have rather expected this from Waffle House, where it's probably on the menu.
Actually, Waffle Houses are great, no matter how many times I forget they don't have fries, I always get a "Would Hay-ash Bray-owns be aw-righttttttt?" Another great contribution from my home state, along with Coca-Cola, Julia Roberts, and Jimmuh Cartuh, umm, joking about the last one. Always wanted to open a Kosher version, "Falafel House"
Frank
Never been but I admit I'm curious.
OK, the Steak is what you imagine a Steak from Waffle House would taste like, everything else is great, and don't make the rookie mistake for asking for Pepsi ("No Pepsi! Coke!!") what do you expect for a business that started in Atlanta??
Frank
fwiw – there have been a few incidences of “nooses” for hanging claims when it was simply a rope used for pulling a garage door down. One of the examples of the demand for racism greatly exceeded the actual supply.
Like all of the texts African Amuricans are supposedly getting offering them jobs picking Cotton, I thought peoples wanted to work??????
Do you mean like this story?
The bowline is the go-to knot when you need a fixed loop in the end of a line, everyone should know how to tie this knot.
The loop in the picture used a hangman's knot instead, a poor choice for a door pull because it tightens and is more work to tie. The only reason to use that knot is if you want it to look like a noose, but there doesn't seem to be a reason to think there was anything more than dark humor behind it.
My mistake, it was a noose - However, the noose had been there prior to the time that Wallace, a black nascar driver was assigned the garage.
https://apnews.com/article/8eb942adcbcb45820e164dd03be4e7d0
No noose is good noose.
Obviously, thread-winner.
I had a noose in my kitchen and one outdoors for hanging rubber chickens (from Archie McPhee in Seattle, made by the finest rubber chicken artisans Spain had to offer), and the outside one kept getting blown down.
I guess I'll have to take the verbal description as accurate because I suspect an internet search for penis shaped pancakes might give some rather unwelcome results.
like it's not the first suggestion that comes up when you hit 'p' in your search box.
I was disappointed the linked PDF did not include the picture.
I notice that the headline of the post was not "The perils of ignoring deadlines" or something similar.
It was not.
Good call.
The dispute between us
As to if a penis
(If correctly seen) is
At all too heinous
Would just demean us
If they do convene us
So we're outta here, baby
What, no sanctions against either or both parties?
ALJs don't generally have that power. Can't say about Florida specifically. ALJs are executive officials, not judicial.
Reads like the old joke about the guy in the psychiatrist office describing each and every ink blot as some form of a sexual act by three or more people. The shrink tells him has a sexual obsession, and the patient points out the doc is the one with a drawer full of dirty pictures.
The patient should just say they all look like pancakes.
Actually, in the old BS Rorschach test, every blot had portions that looked like Peni, and portions that looked like Vagini, (don't say that's what you saw though) even in the 80's it was considered a joke (you got a better score for turning the blots upside down, showed you were creative (or had read the book "Big Secrets") worse score for seeing things like Bats or Snakes, remember one that looked like 2 Indians (American type) facing each other (Don't say thats what you saw!!!)
Frank
In the same psych class, they also mention that when an artist paints a double entendre that might be a penis, it's a penis, plausible deniability be damned.
Capitol Building
Next question is do they regularly make pancakes in that shape, or other buildings? No? Then it ain’t the capitol building.
One might conclude that two attorneys, both presumably bound by canons of professional conduct, would pay attention to a notice setting a hearing in a case they brought or participated in.
One might say the attorneys played hide the sausage pancaow ow stop hitting me!
LOLOLOL
Well, if they wanted to debate how the pancakes were made, maybe they should have showed up.
One question would be why particularly they allegedly made a pancake in the shape of that particular body part for that specific person. Was he rude to the wait staff or something?
I saw an animated children's show with a giant penis. Or maybe it was one of those tall skinny mountains from southern China, where the show was set. But it could have been a penis. To the lawyercopter!
I wonder how serious this part is:
Florida's New Capitol was erected in 1977, towering over the domed legislative buildings on each side of the new building. Judge Early was admitted to the Florida Bar in 1981. I moved to the city in 1984, and away in 1993. At least when I was there, the capitol complex was the butt of jokes about its suggestive geometry.
He said "erected." (snickers in 5th grade).
And "butt"!
I assume plaintiff's attorney was working on contingency, but Bob Evans should check the billing from its no-show lawyer.
[comment deleted by author]
“So you see, Watson,” Holmes explained, puffing at his pipe, “it’s really quite elementary. The cook, just before he was killed, was explaining via this pancake who the murderer was. The obscene pancake was supposed to point to Richard Balzac as the malefactor.”
“Oh, I see, Holmes,” I said, “Dick Balzac, huh-huh huh, huh-huh.”
Maybe the cook was transgender and just trying to engage in symbolic speech. Which would raise a First Amendment defense.