The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Over 1 Million People Flee Cuba in Just Two Years
That amounts to some 10% of the nation's total population. The surge highlights flaws in both right and left-wing positions on Cuba.

The Miami Herald reports that, in 2022-23, a staggering 1 million people fled Cuba's communist regime, some 10% of the total population:
A stunning 10% of Cuba's population — more than a million people — left the island between 2022 and 2023, the head of the country's national statistics office said during a National Assembly session Friday, the largest migration wave in Cuban history.
The data confirmed reporting by the Miami Herald and Cuban independent media that sounded the alarm over the mass migration of Cubans amid a severe economic downturn and a government crackdown on dissent in recent years.
According to the official figures made public for the first time, Cuba's population went from 11,181,595 on Dec. 31, 2021, to 10,055,968 on December 2023.
The emigration of 1,011,269 Cubans was the main factor contributing to a massive fall in Cuba's population by the end of 2023, when the population stood at a number similar to what it was in 1985, said Juan Carlos Alfonso Fraga, the head of the National Statistics and Information Office.
This is but the latest and largest of multiple surges of emigration from Cuba since the communist dictatorship was established in 1959. Cubans have long fled the horrific poverty and oppression created by the government's policies. The situation highlights flaws in both left and right-wing views on Cuba and migration.
There is a long history of Western leftists praising Cuba's communist government. But if the regime is as wonderful as they claim, why are so many people fleeing it? The regime's Western apologists have no good answer to that obvious question. The government's much-vaunted supposed achievements on improving health care are, in fact, largely a combination of repression and data manipulation.
US conservatives rightly condemn the communist government. But, in recent years, all too many of them have also advocated preventing Cubans fleeing it from coming to the US. For example, twenty red states filed a dubious lawsuit seeking to shut down a program allowing Americans to sponsor migrants fleeing Cuba and two other socialist dictatorships (Venezuela and Nicaragua); the case was eventually dismissed on procedural grounds by a conservative federal judge, and is now on appeal. If Cuban communism is as awful as conservatives (rightly) claim, it is unjust to use force to deny refuge to its victims, thereby consigning them to lives of poverty and oppression.
For its part, the Biden Administration was right to create the CNVH program, allowing Cubans (as well as citizens of three other Latin American nations wracked by violence and oppression) to come to the US if they can get American sponsors. But it should lift the arbitrary caps and other limitations that have limited the program's effectiveness.
In addition to saving people from oppression and poverty, letting more Cubans come to the US can also benefit our economy. Past waves of Cuban immigration have been crucial to the economic development of Florida. Today's Cuban refugees can do the same - if only we let them.
In sum, much of the left would do well to rethink its views of Cuba's communist government. And much of the right should reconsider its approach to Cuban immigration. Communism is a great evil, and for that very reason it is also evil to close the door on those fleeing it.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Indeed. Who could forget the Mariel boatlift of 1980, in which Fidel Castro decided to dump 125,000 prisoners and mental patients on American shores and the “Cuban Crime Wave” that followed? I would rank its top two contributions to America as Scarface and Miami Vice.
We'll be getting that x1000 thanks to Biden's open borders policy.
Yep, and now them criminals and lunatics vote solidly Republican. It's funny how a diseased mind migrates politically.
I see you have a PhD in Logic and History from Tik Tok University.
That is no doubt why Democrats agitate endlessly to give felons the vote. The modern Democratic base is something to behold, what, in less politically correct times, we would have called "high-functioning retards". Please forgive my astonishment at this, but, alas, I can remember a time when it wasn't so.
- Curtis Yarvin
You really think Tik Tok U would have accepted him? Even they have standards.
Criminals aren't stupid.
Can you just kill yourself allready?
Uh, no. Crossing a line there. Suggest toning it way down.
Suicide is painless, it brings on many changes, and I can take or leave it as I please
Frank
Of course, that's not at all what happened, as any regular Reason reader knows. A very small number of the Marielitos were prisoners or mental patients, and many of those were people who had committed political, not real, crimes. (Including, it will horrify Republicans to learn, people who had committed the crime of homosexuality in Cuba.) There was no "Cuban Crime Wave" that followed. (It's true that there was a brief surge in crime in Dade County, but it was a blip that had begun before the boatlift.)
Last year in Houston I employed four illegal Cubans in the factory. The most intelligent and hardest working crew I'd ever had. Put my lazy Mexicans to shame. When they first started out they all carpooled in one beat up car. In six months they had each saved enough to buy their own. They were so proud driving their new (used) cars to work in unison. That, my friends, is the American dream in action
Here's hoping someone reports you to the new Trump administration officials.
Almost as unbelievable as the first time you told this Bullshit Story, only Cubans you’re paying is to fuck you up your Bunghole
It’s AlGores Internets, maybe you are some Construction Mogel who lives in Nigger-town and Supervises a Multi/National Dry/Wall racket,
I notice you’ve shriveled up like Common-Laws Cunt Lips once I called you out for your Stolen Valor
Frank
Should be “Stolen Valor Claim”
You’re so proud of your Ill-legal(not just at Bushwood, everywhere claims,
I get it, you’re one of the few Wiggers( don’t blame me, it’s a real word)) trusted to make sure the His-Spanics tote dat bail…..
Hard to believe but I think you’re even more revolting than our Revolting Reverend
Frank
In a somewhat similar vein you can replace California for Cuba although it is not 10% of the states population. A mass exodus is happening though due to similar issues. Cost is number 1 and freedom and culture is number 2
Like Scotland, California is great if it wasn’t for all those Californians
One million people have likewise fled California and New York these last few years. Shouldn't we prioritize these Americans fleeing oppressive socialist regimes over those from abroad?
NO,
Becuase they move South, enjoy the low taxes, warm weather (the N-words Crime rate way over any other groups not so much) But then they find out no permit required for (Constitutional Carry) and theyre good. “”45” wins Jaw Jaw by 10 points
Frank
The solution is simple -- recruit all the illegals into the military and then invade, overthrow their governments, and establish democratic ones at gunpoint.
Or say "sucks to be you and send them all home.
Been there, done that.
Bahía de Cochinos.
Doesn't work.
(at least if democrats try to set it up)
“Dr (unlike Jill Biden and the plethora of “Doctors” you don’t seem to realize, how can I explain it in terms you might understand?
Nobody gives a Fuck,
I’m an actual “Doctor” and I only go by that title in sitch-u-Asians that matter (ie Im getting paid)
Frank “I’m just a man, like you(well way better than you)
Frank
.
Hey, that sounds familiar!
.
Sounds like the period February 2019-January 2020 in America. The final year of the Trump administration.
You’d think devaluing the plight of Cuban dissidents would not be how conservatives want to roll.
That’s because you assume they have paid attention over the past half a century.
Except for the brief period in the 1960s when it was a forward base for Soviet missiles and perhaps in the 1970s when it was sending troups to places like Angola, Cuba just isn’t a particularly important country. Sure, it’s government is hardly the greatest in the world. But let’s stop the reflexive rhetoric of 50 years ago and wake up and realize ancient history is over.
Cuba should be treated as a relatively normal country. Policy should be based on what it does, not on an archaic hatred of its government that comes from a time when people were naive wnough to actually believe ideological labels meant something. Now that Russia has moved from Communist to neo-Tzarist with very little of importance actually changing – only flags, symbols, rhetoric, and other camaflages to fool clueless intellectuals – I think we can drop the nonsense about ideological trappings actually mattering or meaning anything.
You know who could use immigrants from Latin America? Spain. The average age of Spain's farmers is 66 years old. And there is no next generation to take over for these aging men working their land.
It's obvious that engagement is the way to ease the suffering and make Cuba a better place.
John McCain in 2008, opposing lifting sanctions on Cuba: "We should give these sanctions time to work." (65 years after they've been put in place) Yes, Republicans (and a lot of Democrats) really are that stupid. They live in a Tom Clancy movie.
Say what you might about geriatric leaders, but Pope Benedict meeting Fidel in 2012 was a great moment. (Combined age: 171 years.)
Sorry, meant to say 50 years, not 65.
It is clear to the rest of the world that the continued U.S. determination as to sanctions, imposed in 1958, are irrational -- a relic of Big Business's anger at Castro (who was not yet an agent of Moscow) for endangering the economic slavery they had imposed on the Cuban people.
Anyone can travel to Cuba -- but if you're in the United States, you have to fly to Canada first. Some years ago, my mother-in-law visited from her native Dominican Republic. She had a good time. Cuba might be a poor place but she didn't notice that it was any worse than D.R.
.
So, let me get this straight: According to you, Cubans were enslaved before Castro & Co. took over?! And now, supposedly, they're free?!
They must be fleeing from all the freedom! The Cuban government should hire captcrisis to explain to the people how free they're!
My brother lives in Mexico with residency there. He visited Cuba. He's traveled all over central America and Mexico. He said Cuba is the most miserable place he's ever seen with the saddest people. He vowed to not return until Cuba is free.
It's funny how no matter what the USA does against oppressive regimes, it's always wrong.
If we sanction them it's our fault the country is a shithole (we're making ordinary people suffer!). If we trade with them regularly, it's our fault the country is a shithole (we're ignoring human rights abuses!). If we trade with them but try to nudge them into being a better country, it's our fault the country is a shithole (you're imperialists and this is the wages of empire!). Like, perhaps Cuba should make Cuba a better place.
Also: I thought Cuba had the better economic system, just ask them. I think letting a communist and a capitalist country compete side by side and observing the results is a great natural experiment. Working fine for us over here in the USA, I see no reason to stop now.