The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Rock and Roll!
Two wonderful and highly recommended treatments of the early history of rock-and-roll.
I have recently come across two remarkable resources for any of you who are, like me, fascinated [perhaps to the point of obsession] by the early history of rock-and-roll.
The first is the podcast "A History of Rock Music in 500 Songs," [available at the usual spots, and here] produced by Andrew Hickey. It's just what it says it is, and it's pretty astonishing. Each episode tells the story of one song in amazing detail, with a focus on (a) the production: how the song was written, how/why/where it was recorded, who the backing musicians were and how they got there, how they decided to add horns or extra vocals or whatever, etc. etc. - and (b) the music business: who owned the publishing rights and how they got them, who owned the masters and what they did with them, who decided which tracks went on which albums or on 45s (remember 45s?), who got the songwriting credits and why …
The guy has done an unbelievable amount of research, and he tells a great story. I find it mesmerizing (though Hickey's narrating voice takes a little getting used to). It's definitely not for everyone; the episodes are pretty substantial in length (an hour or sometimes a bit more), and they contain more than most people probably want to know about, say, how George Martin ended up producing the Beatles because his boss wanted to punish him for being such a pain in the ass (and for having an affair with his secretary), or how Ike Everly, through his contacts at the barber shop that he owned and operated, helped his sons Phil and Don get their first recording contract, or why Dylan didn't use The Band to back him on Blonde on Blonde, or how Buddy Holly ended up on that airplane because his manager had stolen all of the money The Crickets had earned**, or how The Mob (not a band - the actual Mob) controlled huge swaths of the music business - the clubs, the music publishers and recording companies, the musicians' unions, etc. - in NYC in the '50s and '60s. Etc. etc.
**One of the many, many things about the music industry that I have learned from Hickey is that musicians didn't have to be black to get ripped off by the "suits," who were definitely equal-opportunity crooks and shysters.
But if you love this music and want to learn a shitload of stuff you never knew about how it came to be, I highly recommend it. If you want to give it a try, my advice is to pick a song you're particularly fond of -- he's reached #174, moving chronologically from the beginnings in the late '30s through 1969 thus far.-- and listen to what he has to say about it; that should give you a good sense of whether it's your kind of thing.
The second is something I picked up on Hickey's recommendation (in Episode 100 on "Love Me Do," the Beatles' first Parlophone single from 1962, which I particularly recommend): Mark Lewisohn's magnificent and brilliant biography of the Beatles, "Tune In." This first (of a projected 3 volumes) covers, in 960+ pages (!), the years from their childhoods up to the end of 1962 and the imminent release of their second Parlophone single, "Please Please Me," which would become the first of 32 (!) Number 1 hits they released over the next 7 years.
I have long thought that no biography could possibly touch Robert Caro's magnificent multi-volume set on LBJ, but Lewisohn comes very close - an encyclopedic and incredibly engrossing social history of life in Liverpool (and the UK in general) in the immediate post-WWII years, with real insight into the peculiar combination of dumb luck, sheer brilliance, fearlessness, toughness, love, self-confidence, and single-mindedness of purpose, that enabled four teenage working-class school dropouts - from, of all places, Liverpool, a city in the throes of a terrible decline as a consequence of the twin shocks of Britain's de-industrialization and the ferocious pounding it took from the Germans - were able to transform the global entertainment industry and global culture.
In his Introduction, Lewisohn confronts the obvious question: do we really need 900+ pages and 400,000 words about the early years of what was, after all, just a rock-and-roll band, even one that was an especially terrific and influential one? Here's what he wrote; I think it's the best thing I've ever read about just how special the Beatles were:
"Every once in a while, life conjures up a genuine ultimate. It can be said without fear of hyperbole, this is what the Beatles were and are. And [sixty]-plus years after they leapt into view - [sixty!] - there's little hint it's going to change. So many would-be successors have come and gone, there's now an acceptance that no-one can be bigger or better. John Winston Lennon, James Paul McCartney, George Harrison, and Richard Starkey hold on strong, universally acknowledged as a cultural force, still somehow current and woven into the fabric of modern lives. John, Paul, George, and Ringo - the four Liverpool lads who pumped the heart of a decade that also won't shut up, the 1960s.
If it was necessary to "sell" the Beatles, you could point to many achievements, but their music underpins everything. One game-changing album after another, and one game-changing single after another, two hundred and fourteen tracks recorded in seven crowded years in a kaleidoscope of styles. This music is known, loved, respected, discussed, imitated, cherished, and studied. It continues to inspire new artists and be reshaped impressively in every genre. Its song titles and words are adapted for headlines in 21st century media, its quotes are enfolded in everyday vocabulary and chanted in football stadiums. Infused with the Beatles' energy and personalities, this music still lifts the spirit and is passed joyfully from generation to generation. Clearly, something special happened here - but what? How?
Consider too how the Beatles repeatedly married cutting-edge originality with immense mainstream popularity, when for almost anyone else these are mutually exclusive. And how and why they ditched their winning ideas every time the world raced to copy them. Consider how they did everything with down-to-earth humor, honesty, optimism, style, charisma, irreverence, intelligence, and a particularly spiky disdain for falseness. How they were articulate, bold, curious, direct, instinctive, challenging, blunt, sharp, polite, rude - prickers of pomposity, rule-breakers never cowed by convention. And consider how they created a profound and sustained connection to their public, and how they resisted branding, commercial sponsorship, and corporate affiliation and hype. The Beatles were free of artifice, and weren't the product of market research or focus groups or TV talent shows. They were original, and developed organically when everyone was looking the other way. . . .
I've been waiting for a book this sweeping story demands … one that explains how the society that shaped the Beatles first received them and then was shaped by them, how John, Paul, George, and Ringo dealt with each other as friends and bandmates, how they so deftly handled the media and such phenomenal celebrity, how they transformed the worldwide music industry and shook global youth culture awake, and how they induced a revolution in how people listen to and play music. The Beatles didn't invent the electric guitar, and weren't the first guitar group - but every rock band since 1963 is fulfilling their legacy …."
As with the Hickey podcast, it's not for everyone. But the Lewisohn book sweeps much more broadly Hickey's podcast, and I don't think you have to be quite the same kind of rock-and-roll obsessive to enjoy it and to learn an enormous amount about what the world was like in the middle of the last century.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Two thoughts:
(1) Great! A 500-episode podcast and 3,000 pages of reading. Just what I needed!
(2) Thank you for the pointer.
We will have a quiz on Monday.
One thought:
Will give you something to do rather than commenting here.
That's what UCLA said.
A related online recommendation is Stereogum's The Number Ones series, which contains detailed history of every artist and song ever to reach number 1 on the Billboard Hot 100.
Even the Macarena?? The forbidden dance???
Yes.
BTW aren't you in prison?
Much as I enjoy the Beatles music, I seriously believe much of their later work would not have sold without the name (excuse me, "Yellow Submarine", fun song but have a very hard time believing it would have sold without the Beatles name attached to it). I can't find it now but recall an author saying something like "They could sell my shopping list if they slapped my name on it", same with the Beatles.
So they could turn water into wine?? Just like Jesus??
I think it's more like Lincoln's "You can fool all of the people some of the time".
I think it was Stephen King's laundry list. King earned his fame and then he became too big to edit. As for the Beatles, the clumsy editing of side 2 of Abbey Road stands out as something a good team would not have let out to be pressed.
If you ever want to learn about making movies watch these two movies back to back—Valentine’s Day and Mother’s Day. The director was clearly dying during Mother’s Day and so you can see everything he does wrong because it’s obviously not the other collaborators that don’t know how to make a movie because they are all professionals at the top of their respective games.
I agree.
One can’t fault their musicianship — they were an accomplished, tight band — but after Sgt. Pepper it was largely sloppy, indulgent songwriting. As one lady said during their rooftop concert, “The songs don’t make any sense!”
As one lady said during their rooftop concert, “The songs don’t make any sense!”
That sounds like someone who doesn't understand/appreciate the fact that music is an aesthetic/emotional experience, not an intellectual one. Musical tracks don't necessarily have to "make sense" to be good. Some pieces are more about the instrumentals and/or vocals than they are about the lyrics (and no, those aren't the same things). Take for instance the majority of Jethro Tull's best stuff. The lyrics tended to vaguely suggest some general theme/subject, but didn't really make any sort of coherent sense. Think Locomotive Breath, Bungle In The Jungle, Mother Goose, etc. There were many artists like that, with albums full of stuff where the lyrics didn't matter nearly as much as the "sound", or at least the lyrics were just supposed to sound sort of poetic rather than tell a story or convey any real meaning. And to go to the extreme, Edgar Winter's Frankenstein with no lyrics at all.
At the other end of the spectrum you had artists like Johnny Cash, Jimmy Dean, Gordon Lightfoot, Harry Chapin et al who were pretty much just telling stories that were set to music. The music was important, but it existed to support the story being told.
I HIGHLY recommend Cocaine and Rhinestones.
https://player.fm/series/cocaine-rhinestones-the-history-of-country-music
I highly recommend cocaine and poontang!
I suspect they're the same thing, just one more cleverly phrased.
I should have checked my rock n roll thesaurus.
The Night Flight Orchestra is a side project by Swedish metal musicians to recreate the sound of rock music at the end of the 1970s and the beginning of the 1980s. They hit their target perfectly, writing new songs that would not sound out of place 40 years earlier. One of the founders commented on their music: "we sound like cocaine". Their main songwriter died recently and I doubt we will see new music.
Greta Van Fleet is another throwback band. They sound like Led Zeppelin instead of cocaine.
What does this have to do with Donald Trump?
^ best comment! 🙂
"or how The Mob (not a band—the actual Mob) controlled huge swaths of the music business—the clubs, the music publishers and recording companies, the musicians' unions, etc.—in NYC in the '50s and '60s. Etc. etc."
I graduated from Berklee College of Music in '95 with a Music Business/Management degree. One of the key professors was a former record company insider and he basically told us this.
In fact one of the assigned books to read was something that described the dynamic in detail. It featured guys like Gaetano "Corky" Vastola.
I don't know if guy's like Peter Grant (Led Zeppelin's manager) or Don Arden (Sharon Osbourne's father) occupied any "official position" in organized crime; but they were basically gangsters in how they did their jobs.
For a genuine gangster-rocker tale, check the story of Tommy James and the Shondells (Mony Mony, Crimson and Clover, Crystal Blue Persuasion, Draggin’ the Line, I Think We’re Alone Now). I learned of it through work, years ago. Years later, Tommy James wrote a book about it; I think he may have waited for some people to become unable to kill him before writing (or, perhaps, publishing) it.
I saw a show a few years ago; if Tommy James and the Shondells play in your neighborhood, it’s a worthwhile ticket. Like the Tubes, he is not afraid to repeat a good song.
I have long wondered what a shondell is.
Wonder no more.
Wow!! A Reverend post that doesn’t immediately invoke thoughts of a middle-schooler sticking his thumbs in his ears and saying “I know you are, but what am I?”
You figure my comments are not congruent with the quality standards of Volokh Conspiracy content?
Tommy James and the Shondells had some of the great pop songs of the day.
The Guess Who is another 60's band that also had some rockers. Creed Bratton (The Office) was drummed out of the band for continuously arguing that they should play their own instruments on records, not just live.
Ha!
Great post, Post! Go UNH Soccer!
Thanks Arthur. I remember those songs fondly from my youth. I have been putting a vinyl collection together again and came across a Tommy James and the Shondells album at the thrift - $2.09 on senior day. Ha, ha! (Those bastards raised the price of LPs from $1.99 to $2.99 recently, but at least senior day is 30% off.)
What a stroll down memory lane! And honestly, I though all of their stuff was released as singles.
I'm looking into the book. Is this it?:
Me, the Mob, and the Music: One Helluva Ride with Tommy James and the Shondells
Indeed it’s good. Waiting for an episode about Black Sabbath.
David,
Both of these sound exactly like what I’m interested in. I’m the kind of person who sees a giant tome that says part 1 of 3 and starts salivating. Add in the focus on early rock and roll? There’s no way I can resist!
Thank you VERY much for the recommendations.
I will look for a podcast on the history of jazz, which I'm really interested in lately. It's fascinating to me that after centuries of what seems like a stagnant fog of music evolution, a flood of new genres appeared in the 20th century, perhaps aided by communication and recording technology.
My current favorite movie is A Song Is Born, 1948, with Danny Kaye and Virginia Mayo. I love Danny Kaye, and Virginia Mayo is gorgeous and engaging. But this movie has the most incredible cast of famous musicians: Benny Goodman, Tommy Dorsey, Louis Armstrong, Lionel Hampton, Charlie Barnet, Mel Powell, "Buck and Bubbles," Louie Bellson, and more. Wow, what a cast! And, it's a fun comedy with a plot.