The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Tucker Carlson vs. the Evidence of Russians Voting with their Feet
Carlson praises Russia's supposed abundance and high living standards. Hundreds of thousands of Russians fleeing Putin's regime think otherwise.

During his visit to Russia to interview Vladimir Putin, right-wing former Fox News talk show host Tucker Carlson made waves by praising the supposed abundance and low prices at a Moscow supermarket. He said the experience "radicalized" him against US leaders, and that Moscow is "so much nicer than any US city."
How can we tell if Carlson is right about life in Russia being better than in the US? Try the evidence of people voting with their feet. When people choose what government they want to live under through foot voting, they have much stronger incentives to make good decisions than ballot box voters - or media pundits.
Since 2022, over 1 million Russians have fled Vladimir Putin's increasingly repressive regime. They are willing to go to even such relatively poor countries as Armenia and Kazakhstan. Many thousands have tried to move to the US by way of the Mexican border, despite the very real risk of detention and deportation. Many more would emigrate to the US and other Western nations if only we would let them (as we should!).
By contrast, Americans who want to emigrate to Russia are few and far between. Last year, the Russian government floated a plan to build a village for disaffected expatriate American right-wingers. But they seem to have quietly mothballed the idea, probably for fear it wouldn't attract any significant number of takers.
Why are so many Russians eager to flee to the West? One major factor is that, despite Carlson's claims, Russia is actually a poor nation. As of 2022, per capita GDP was about $15,270, less than one-fifth the US figure of $76,300. And that's despite the fact that Russia has some of the world's largest deposits of oil and precious metals. The average monthly wage in Russia is about 73,800 rubles (an annual salary of about $9700 at current exchange rates). Some 20% of Russian households lack indoor plumbing.
It's also worth noting that Moscow is the richest city in Russia. And even there, Carlson (like many other visiting westerners) probably didn't see much of the parts where ordinary people live, as opposed to sites frequented by foreign tourists. Had he done so (as I have), he would have seen Third World-like poverty. And that poverty is much worse in smaller cities and in rural areas.
One of Carlson's errors was at least somewhat understandable. I once made a similar one, myself. I am a native of what was then the Soviet Union, and a native speaker of Russian. Back in 1995, I visited Russia for the first time since emigrating in 1979. Like Carlson in 2024, I noticed that many prices were lower than in the US. When I pointed this out to a Moscow-based Russian relative of mine, she got angry: "Stop saying the prices here are low," she admonished me. "They are not low compared to our incomes."
She was right. Part of what I (and later Carlson) saw is the strength of the US dollar, which enjoys highly favorable exchange rates because many foreigners want to hold dollar-denominated assets as a "store of value" (by contrast, few non-Russians have a similar demand for rubles). Another relevant factor is that prices for many goods and services are lower in poor nations, in part because labor is much cheaper (having fewer alternative opportunities).
Relative to income, food prices in Russia are actually much higher than in the US, not lower. In 2021, the state-run news agency TASS (which certainly does not want to make the Russian government look bad!) reported that 75% of Russians spend half or more of their income on food. Things have likely gotten worse since then, with the inflation and shortages caused by the war against Ukraine. In the US, by contrast, the average American spends about 11.3% of disposable personable income on food. Even for the poorest quintile of the population, that rises to only 31%.
Even as Carlson was praising Russia's food abundance, the government was urging Russians to start growing their own bananas, to make up for anticipated shortages resulting from Putin's restrictions on imports. Perhaps Carlson can do a special program on how Russia's climate is great for raising bananas. Thanks to Putin, the country is on its way to becoming the world's greatest banana republic!
In addition to widespread poverty, Russia also has horrific repression. You can get up to 15 years in prison just for referring to the "special military operation" in Ukraine as a war. Just today, Russia's most prominent opposition leader, Alexi Navalny, died in prison. Other prominent dissenters, such as Vladimir Kara-Murza and Ilya Yashin are also behind bars, often under terrible conditions. Carlson claims to be a great free speech advocate. If so, he shouldn't be defending Putin.
Carlson also fantasizes about how the US government might draft his children to fight in Ukraine, even though there is no real prospect of any draft here. Russia, however, actually does have a draft, in which thousands of young men are forced to fight in an unjust war, primarily the poor and non-Russian minorities.
Growing repression and conscription are additional reasons why so many Russians are voting with their feet against their government. If you want to know what conditions in Russia are truly like, you should listen to them, not Tucker Carlson.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Tucker Carlson is an attention-craving misfit pandering to his audience of gape-jawed, un-American misfits by cuddling with international misfits Vladimir Putin and Russia.
Better Americans have exhausted their appetite for Carlson, his clinger fans, and Russia's inferior society. But Carlson is probably quite popular among fans of a white, male, bigot-hugging blog, though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRYSKaS-XtQ
This interview with Menz was SO good! Everyone across Europe is watching it, from the left to the right.
Imagine that it's correct: you're fucked.
Imagine that it's a gish gallop: millions of Americans will believe it nonetheless, and you're fucked. (It's probably largely, if not wholly, accurate, however.)
You're fucked, AIDS. Proper fucked. Your American betters will tar and feather you. What's your exit strategy from the United States, AIDS, you totalitarian fuckwit?
The millions of Americans who believe it are stupid and will believe anything. So they'll only believe it until the next shiny object comes along to distract their gaze. And so it goes.
Growing repression and conscription are additional reasons why so many Russians are voting with their feet against their government. If you want to know what conditions in Russia are truly like, you should listen to them, not Tucker Carlson.
We can listen to everyone, and make our own judgments and come to our own conclusions; and express them. We are free to do so, unlike the Russians. For this I am grateful.
Tucker Carlson and his fans should be able to speak and listen as they wish. Downscale, bigoted, un-American culture war losers have rights, too.
No no no, XY, you're off script - you're supposed to say that the woke mind-virus that has taken over the media and American corporations severely limits what you can say or even think, and that therefore Russian control over the public discourse would come as a welcome relief for any right-minded individuals.
I have never been very good at thinking what I have been told to think. 🙂
That's what you think!
You "can" listen to utter bullshit, just like you "can" stick a fork in your eye.
But you shouldn't.
Between the United States and Russia, one country just arbitrarily seized the assets of an oligarch opposed to the regime, and is trying to jail him
The other country is Russia
---Will Chamberlain
"Arbitrarily" doesn't mean what you think it means.
Maybe you’re right, instead of “arbitrarily” perhaps he should have used “in all the greatest traditions of the police state” or maybe “in a kangaroo court show trial”? Still, brevity may be better and "arbitrarily" is good enough shorthand for the above.
I think work in some Clinton Death List to really send your posting over the top.
Vince Foster doesn't add up.
Any head wound to a live person is messy, and a fatal GSW is exceptionally messy -- that's a biological fact.
And his wasn't. Hence it's not what killed him...
While I suppose messiness is one of the few things a janitor might have expertise with, I doubt that you really have been called upon to clean up many fatal gunshot wounds to the head. Although come to think of it, you yourself having head wounds would explain quite a lot, including this comment of yours.
It boggles my mind that anyone who’s been around politicians and bureaucrats as much as Tucker Carlson would fall for such obvious propaganda pits. My folks had a subscription to Soviet Life in the early 1960s, I think it was called, and pretty much the same format as Life and Look. It was fun to look at, just for being foreign and different, but such obvious and blatant propaganda that even a kid could tell it was bogus, staged, counterfeit, nonsense, whatever term you want.
I have never listened to any of his shows, I’ve probably watched a few seconds of him here and there, and my impression was always that he was more reliable than CNN or MSNBC. But if he is such a useful idiot that he thinks a Moscow grocery store is any kind of truthful representation, then he’s worse than CNN and MSNBC.
Tucker did not fall for anything. Tucker is willingly complicit in the deception.
This man is on record as knowingly lying to his Trump-loving viewers. He's not gullible or misled by any stretch of the imagination. The Kremlin is buttering his bread.
The sheer idiocy of the Tucker propaganda bits, and the fake-journalism, makes me kind of sad. In the same way that popular sitcoms make me depressed about Americans' taste in comedy, Tucker's propaganda only reminded me that there are people stupid enough in this country to find at least some of it persuasive.
To their credit, I would guess that only some of the VC's regular MAGA-heads bought it.
I don't know. Carlson has specifically tailored his shtick to attract and sustain his targeted viewers--he didn't just randomly decide to spout Putin's propaganda. He seems to know what his viewers want to see.
Carlson has lost his Fox News platform, that means several important things for his show:
1) He's now free of the oversight of his former employer.
2) He no longer benefits from Fox News promotion.
3) His viewers need to seek him out in a way they didn't before.
All of those factors push him in one direction, go further to the fringe to make his remaining fan base more loyal.
Yes, Russia is a poor nation. We should stop provoking them into war.
If Russia is really such a repressive country, we should wait to hear what Carlson says once he is safely out of the country.
The thing about useful idiots, is they stay useful because they remain an idiot no matter where they go.
He was in Dubai on Monday. While speaking at the "World Government Summit" there, he repeated his praise for Russia, Moscow, and Putin, and when specifically asked about Navalny, explained that "Leadership requires killing people."
Your move.
It's definitely a flexible use of "specifically." Here's the actual exchange, in case you didn't look past the headlines:
He mentioned Navalny by name, that’s pretty specific.
And Carlson’s reply seems pretty on point with Navalny and other assassinations of opposition leaders. If you think that quote makes Carlson look any better than the summary provided by Noscitur a sociis, then I have to question your critical thinking skills.
“every leader kills people, including my leader. Every leader kills people, some kill more than others. Leadership requires killing people”
Not every leader kills their political opponents, which is the killing he was asked about. In fact, most democratic leaders don’t. Most totalitarians do. That’s an important distinction and a good reason to prefer democracy to totalitarianism.
Also, Carlson is completely wrong about censorship. There is not a great deal of press censorship in the United States. He is conflating editorial decisions by news organizations with censorship by the government. The two aren’t remotely similar in danger to society, even if you think the practical effects at a given point in time are similar. I don’t need to explain the reasons or details to anyone who isn’t an idiot, whether congenitally or by choice.
Bullshyte.
Can you say January 6th? Team Bite Me is still destroying people's lives, just more efficiently. And just because we don't spill blood with a Nitrogen execution the way we would with a beheading, is the person any less dead?
We DO have government oriented press censorship in this country, it just is more efficient than in other countries. Remember the NYP and the story about Hunter Biden's Laptop???
"Can you say January 6th?"
Granted, Trump implicitly or at least tacitly approved of hanging Mike Pence, but he didn't succeed and right thinking people shun him for it.
We DO have government oriented press censorship in this country, it just is more efficient than in other countries. Remember the NYP and the story about Hunter Biden’s Laptop???
The fact that you cite to a free press story about the laptop (and either of us could link to plenty others) gives lie to the fact that we have censorship of the type Russia does.
That would be the NYP story which was spiked on Xitter for a whole 36 hours, wasn't it? I think Farcebook did something to de-prioritize it, too, but that was the entirety of the "censorship".
And even for those 36 hours or so, the only thing that was "spiked" was the URL of that one specific article. People were free to — and did — discuss the story and its contents. And it was covered in every major news outlet.
Anyone who thinks you can make a gallows out of 1" pine boards nailed together in a rickety fashion is a moron. Pence weighs what 160-180 lbs? Those boards wouldn't have held a third of that...
Can someone please explain to me the psychological disfunction that would cause someone to be willing to call for the mass murder of innocent civilians and cheer about sex workers being killed, but unwilling to type the word "bullshit"?
I think he’s a royalist. It’s a way of signaling fealty to king George
Loyalist, not royalist.
And how!!
Loyal to whom?
Janitor's Code. You'd know that if you spent time amongst the real people of Maine.
They are not innocent. And I said that the prostitutes knowingly assumed the risk of being murdered, not celebrated it.
“Hunter Biden’s Laptop?”
Here’s a little mental exercise for you, just to give yourself an idea of your grasp of this whole sordid affair: how many “hunter biden’s laptop” laptops are there?
Only one with a mirrored hard drive although I believe there are three.
“Only one… although three”
Is that your final answer?
Yes, it's apparently a profound answer to the religious riddle: How is Hunter Biden's computer similar to The Father, The Son, and the Holy Ghost?
https://heartontheleft.wordpress.com/2014/07/13/how-many-methodists/
“And just because we don’t spill blood with a Nitrogen execution the way we would with a beheading, is the person any less dead?”
I think you mean experimental nitrogen execution.
“Team Bite Me is still destroying people’s lives, just more efficiently.”
Seriously! Everyone forgets about Ashlii Babbitt— just a nice unarmed tourist, taking pictures, shot down in cold blood.
You'd be saying something different had the schmuck instead shot one of the three police officers next to her -- WHICH HE ALMOST DID.
Oh, have we started giving the death penalty to Jan 6ers? It's about time!
My goodness, that's certainly a... touchy response to my simple and straightforward posting of the entire context of the exchange rather than the crop-quoted bloodbath meme making the rounds. Restating the crop-quote in slightly different words isn't particularly helpful.
And if you think the constant stream of insults somehow serves to bolster your opinionated paraphrasing, that's unfortunate but about all I've come to expect from you.
They call this move the 'calm Hitler.'
Godwin was a flippin' genius.
Yeah, he has actually said it's appropriate to compare these people to Hitler.
Which insult applied to you? None were specifically directed at you.
Carlson deserves every insult available.
He's saying it to excuse Putin's murdering his own citizens, it's not that difficult to discern, it's the question he's answering, and inasmuch as the US has ever done anything similar, ie, assassinating people at home or abroad, restricting political movements, he's *also* excusing that.
And he's parroting his Dear Leader, whose response in 2016 to discussion of Putin murdering opponents was, "You think our country is so innocent?"
Which would be a hate crime against America if a Democrat said it.
Tucker is actually right -- look at what Brandon's DOJ is doing.
Maybe not killing people -- yet -- but still look at what they are doing.
Tucker is actually right — look at what Brandon’s DOJ is doing.
Maybe not killing people
Dr. Ed 2 was so close, so very close, to making an important logical connection and, hence, distinction.
And as for what they are doing: Pursuing actual criminals. (And here's where some wit, or half of one, says "That's what Putin says he's doing!" Yes, but saying you are doing something is not the same as doing it. But, this late in the game, I understand a Trump supporter likely will be incapable of understanding that distinction.)
Look what Putin's doing - and he cannot be prosecuted, or even investigated, for any of it. He's completely above the law. This appears to be your goal for trump.
I'm sure Putin would say that he is also pursuing actual criminals.
And you'd believe him.
It's not a case of believing him but determining what Russian law says.
We should compare Biden with Putin.
Biden is a deranged demented psychopathic serial/spree murderer that must be tried for genocide, almost certainly convicted, and sentenced to the gallows.
Netanyahu is an even worse psychopathic serial/spree murderer. How does Putin compare with Biden?
None of those three compares to the evils of the Prophet (PBUH), of course.
I mean, North Korea is _really_ such a repressive country, and we don’t need to wait to hear what Dennis Rodman said when he left.
In truth, Rodman’s point of view is more useful, because at least the average person doesn’t know any North Koreans. I haven’t met any, anyway. Whereas I would hazard a guess anyone living in an American city has Russian expatriates in their immediate social or professional circle. I grew up with friends who were Soviet (Russian) defectors. Had Russian kids in my high school (I grew up on a rural island). Had 7 Russians in my relatively small grad school program. Had some Russians in my apartment complex the last place I lived. Just interviewed a Russian national for a job at my employer a few months ago. There are no shortage of Russian clubs and social organizations in various U.S. cities. I’ve never been to Russia (most of my travel has been south rather than east) but my father went a few times, my in-laws went a few times. Between the opening of the USSR and a few years ago travel to Russia was cheap and easy, there were cruises going to Russia, there were flights going to Russia, there were events in Russia. Looks like there’s somewhere around 650,000 Russian-born Russians in the U.S. and several million of recent Russian descent.
I get that not everyone lives in a big city, but is there such a large audience of people who are unexposed to and mystified Russia and have no way of knowing what’s going on there and can’t think of a way to crack the mystery?
If I want to know what’s going on in a Russian supermarket, I send a message to one of a half dozen people I know living in Russia and ask them. I’m hardly a jetsetter and I don’t speak a word of Russian.
Who is Daivd?
Pretty sure Behar used that name after his account got banned. Haven't seen him in a while, but Affleck and Drackman together cover for him well enough.
I travel a lot overseas, and the two main things that make many things less expensive in some countries is exchange rates, and labor.
But other things are more expensive, for instance don’t think you are going to get an iPhone cheaper overseas.
I spent a couple of months in Turkey 2 years ago when the Lira collapsed from 10-16 lira per dollar over the space of about 10 days. I thought everything was incredibly cheap, especially restaurants and hotels, while all the Turks were in shock because everything they imported just went up 60%.
I don't know why I bother to respond to someone as obtuse as Ilya but what he has written demands a response.
First, Singapore is a nice city to visit, but I would not want to live there. There were Soviets in the late '70s complaining about things (people) in Soviet cities and how "that would never have been allowed when Stalin was alive." I don't doubt it -- Stalin would have had the malefactor killed.
There are a lot of people in American cities who would be DEAD if they were doing the same thing in Moscow. Petty criminals, aggressive begging, shooting up on the streetcorner -- I doubt Putin tolerates that, which does make a nicer city.
A nicer city -- but at what price.
Second, Tucker Carlson is a REPORTER -- he REPORTS on what other people, such as dictators, have to say. That's what reporters do, and in his case, he's unemployed so he is looking for big ticket interviews.
Third, if half the stuff you have said about Putin is true, wouldn't it be wise not to piss him off???
Just wondering....
And here we have it, violence obsessed Dr. Ed is a coward.
I could give a fuck if I piss off Putin and Carlson shouldn’t either. It’s as likely money as fear that has him spewing propaganda for a cold-blooded murderer. But cowardice could play into it too.
you don't try to interview someone for the purposes of pissing him off...
You don't try to interview a murderer with the purpose of spreading and amplifying their propaganda either. Well, maybe you do, but any responsible journalist / talking head / person with any moras doesn't. Carlson is quite clearly none of those things.
I for one would give at least a nickel to watch you go to Russia, get in Putin's face, and do your little internet Billy Badass routine. Make sure to livestream it!
Thanks for the un-American perspective, Life of Brian.
I don't claim to have a thimble full of courage compared to Navalny. But neither Carlson nor Dr. Ed are in a materially different position than I am vis a vis Putin and yet Dr. Ed is scared of pissing off Putin and he posits that Carlson is too. It's not that I have much courage, it's that they have so little.
Restating my point a bit more directly, Carlson was indeed in a materially different position than you -- sitting in the middle of the Kremlin. So sitting here in the US hiding behind your keyboard and shrilly opining on what he should have said or done in that interview is really pretty laughable.
And how did he end up there again?
The quote you provided was not when Carlson was not "sitting in the middle of the Kremlin." Try again.
Well, if Carlson was afraid to piss off Putin while he was in the Kremlin, and felt that for his safety he had to parrot Putin's BS, then what was the point of the interview?
Tucker is not a reporter, he was not trained as a reporter; he is a commentator.
And nowadays he's just a provocateur.
An actual reporter would be trained to think twice about giving legitimacy to a dictator by interviewing them. And would certainly have come more prepared.
OK, Gaslighto, how about all the OTHER reporters who have interviewed Putin?
Which other reporters?
Many other reporters have interviewed Putin, but since the invasion the only western "reporter" that Putin agreed to be interviewed by is Tucker Carlson.
Amusingly Putin was annoyed that Carlson was too sycophantic.
No, a *serious* reporter would have managed to interview Putin in a serious, intelligent, probing manner. You can't harangue someone like that when you're in the lion's den, but it would be clearly understood that this is a lion, this is his den, it is a lion's den, he eats people, their bones are everywhere. An interview with someone like Putin should chill the fuck out of you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRYSKaS-XtQ
This interview was GOLD, tankie.
Are you just virtue signalling to your friends here, or are you genuinely afraid of not towing the official line now in the US. Are you, in other words, SCREAMING YOUR OFFICIAL TWO MINUTES OF HATE?
Go back to Russia. You might not like the price of goods or the wages, but your totalitarian attitude is better suited there.
Breaking: Tucker Carlson is an idiot. In other news, scientists discover liquid water is wet.
Well, those You-Crane girls do really knock me out, they leave
the West behind, And Moscow girls make me sing and shout (Ooh, ooh-ooh-ooh)
That Georgia's always on my mi-mi-mi-mi-mi-mi-mi-mi-mind!!!
The rate of male alcoholism is Russia is about 40%. That tells you a lot about how things are in that country. Some men are walking away while others are crawling into a bottle to escape.
Speaking of delusional twits, Jonathan Turley is all over Fox News this evening, lambasting the judge in the Trump case and the prosecutors in the other Trump case but mostly doing a Montgomery Burns impression.
is it as good as your Jerry Sandusky impression?
Sandusky, the backwater Republican?
Sandusky, the lifelong conservative?
Sandusky, the white, male, rural, right-wing target audience of this right-wing blog?
you left out mediocre college foo-bawl coach/pediofile
The Volokh Conspiracy has made me grateful I am not autistic.
It was incredibly embarrassing to watch. Turley, who used to have a reputation as a slightly-conservative straight-talking legal expert, decided (years ago) to whore his integrity to Trump. On Fox news; John Yoo was the voice of reason, and then Turley went off the deep end, trying incoherently to explain why this incredibly-detailed blow-by-blow judicial opinion failed. Turley, schooled by fucking John Yoo. One of the signs of the apocalypse.
It’s not the apocalypse. It’s the collapse of conservatism.
'Conservatism', you mean. American-style 'conservatism'.
The American right has finally come to its senses (as have some of the centrists and working class), and so European-style conservatism is finally taking hold.
The bigger picture, though, is that your LIBERAL order is collapsing. (Good work fucking all of us in the rest of the West over too whilst you were at it.) Historians will deem your cultish BS to have been a superficial, self-contradictory ideology, one whose implications adherents THEMSELVES didn't even believe in!
ACTUALLY choose reason, AIDS. See that your time is over.
How can we tell if Carlson is right about life in Russia being better than in the US? Try the evidence of people voting with their feet.
There’s a problem with that “foot voting” analogy. Japan is a nice place to live, clean, very low crime, etc – yet not many migrants choose that as a destination. Not because there is anything wrong with Japan, but because unlike Europe and the US, Japan is not generous to migrants and giving them lots of free stuff. Same thing with Russia.
The war in Ukraine is also a factor. People tend to leave during wars. I don’t believe many young male immigrants were clamoring to become US citizens during the US Civil War, or WWII, etc.
Of course I would rather live in the US than Russia. But let’s not pretend that the number of migrants tells the whole story.
I’m not sure that “people only want to leave Russia because its dictator tried to start a war of conquest” is the rousing defense you think it is.
You misread if you thought I was trying to make a "rousing defense" of Russia.
What on earth are you talking about? Immigrants don’t avoid Japan because it refuses to give them “lots of free stuff.” Immigrants are generally not permitted to come to Japan.
I'm referring to asylum seekers more than legal immigrants, and you are helping make my point for me. Japan doesn't welcome them like the US does. That's one huge reason for the larger numbers coming here.
Moron
Japan has no land borders
A NOrth Korean would have to sail past a whole bunch of South Korea to land in Japan
everyone else is near 1000 miles away by water
“I don’t believe many young male immigrants were clamoring to become US citizens during the US Civil War.” One of my wife’s great-great grandfathers immigrated from Canada to the U.S. precisely to fight in the Civil War. He enlisted in the 7th Wisconsin and was not mustered out until the end of the war. Of course there were also those who were paid to enlist in order to take the place of patriots like John D. Rockefeller. According to Wikipedia, Rockefeller said that he really wanted to join the army and do his part, but like so many in my generation he had other priorities.
" I don’t believe many young male immigrants were clamoring to become US citizens during the US Civil War"
Actually there were -- this was in the midst of the Irish Potato Famine although they didn't know they would be immediately shipped off to war. See "NYC Draft Riots."
The Civil War did not, in fact, occur “in the midst” of the Irish potato famine.
I'm kinda* curious about exactly how and/or why Grampa Ed is so unsurprisingly&predictably flat-out wrong: does he think the US Civil War overlapped with 1845-1852, or that the Great Hunger overlapped with 1861-1865?
*in that "can't look away from a train wreck" sort of way
Is "life in Russia...better than in the US"? Of course not. I cannot imagine moving (back) to Russia. But life here is rapidly deteriorating. I am talking about the economy, public order, crime, illegal immigration, etc., etc. The justice system is increasingly unjust (there is no longer "equal justice under the law"; similar offenses are treated differently based on who the defendant is). The regime currently in power is actively trying to get rid of the head of the opposition (by banning him from politics and prosecuting him), just like ... Putin!
The people doing these things ought to ask themselves: If the people see how you are ruining the country in a myriad ways, and you prevent them from democratically replacing you -- what options are left to them? Will Americans to start immigrating en masse, like Russians have been doing? Probably not. (Like I said, I am not moving from here, neither to Russia nor anywhere else.) So, what then? You expect that they'll just sit there, watching what you're doing, and just "take" it? Are the American people really that pathetic? I think you might be underestimating them...
The “regime in power” is “trying to get rid of Trump” by… prosecuting him in open court, in cases that they’re probably going to lose. Putin, for his part, assassinated Navalny after falsely imprisoning him.
Doesn’t seem that similar to me!
‘The regime currently in power is actively trying to get rid of the head of the opposition (by banning him from politics and prosecuting him), just like … Putin!’
The supporters of the head of the opposition want him to be treated as if he is above the law, just like … Putin!
‘I am talking about the economy, public order, crime, illegal immigration, etc., etc.’
Well, no, generally you are talking about piss-poor migrant workers and asylum seekers, ‘wokism’ – meaning, for example that it is generally less socially acceptable to be mean to gay people – utterly minor and uninteresting incidents in a tiny handful of universities, and a vast conspiracy that is always doing something or other such as responding to a pandemic or climate change, but for EVIL reasons that never make sense.
Disaffected, all-talk, right-wing assholes like Ed Grinberg are among the most deserving culture war casualties . . . and the core target audience of this bigot-hugging, wingnut blog.
Open wider, clingers.
You are not talking about any of those things, all of which are getting better. You are talking about what Fox News tells you about those things.
Shorter Ed G: "Don't they know they're only supposed to treat black people that way?"
There is no "regime" currently in power. Unlike Donald Trump in 2016, Biden was democratically elected. We call that a "government," not a "regime."
I am talking about the economy,
You are talking about a fantasy economy that exists only in the head of Trump cultists like you.
The author highlights some significant moral differences between individuals who are oppressed Russians voting with their feet and individuals who were victims of the Nakba. Those killed by Israelis during the Nakba cannot eat, whereas oppressed Russians can do so. Those killed by Israelis during the Nakba cannot fight for any army -- or even be so-called terrorists -- whereas oppressed Russians can. Those killed by Israelis during the Nakba cannot purchase goods at any price whereas oppressed Russians can do so. Those killed by Israelis during the Nakba cannot have children who might lead a better life whereas oppressed Russians can do so.
The author of the post claims moral authority; however, those killed by Israelis during the Nakba might argue otherwise... if they were alive and could argue.
You're a deranged Jew-hating psychopath. There was no "Nakba". Jews didn't kill Arabs, certainly didn't pick any fight with Arabs. The Arab Palestinians plight is entirely self-inflicted.
The events of 1948 are pretty well documented. "Jews didn't kill Arabs, certainly didn't pick any fight with Arabs" is unfortunately not correct.
Uh, it isnt as if Russia hasn't killed, like, thousands and thousands of people who can't move, eat, fight, or have children.
What about those who were murdered by Muhammad during his jihads?
What about all the millions of infidels and dhimmis who were murdered (and the former who were enslaved) under the genocidal, apartheid sharia jurisdictions over the last 1400 years?
SURELY that's a better comparator, no?
Putin and Somin have two things in common. They are both Russian, and they both agree with the party in power prosecuting its political enemies.
The Russian and American justice systems are not comparable. Nor are their electoral systems...
I agree with one tiny caveat.
Just... it's not 'voting.' Not in any meaningful sense. You're taking a phrase that can merely refer to a person walking out of a room, applying it to people fleeing misery and opression, and ascribing it democratic value. They can't change the conditions they're fleeing from, otherwise they probably wouldn't have fled. They have limited choices about where they can or are allowed to flee to. Some of the governments they 'choose' treat them with appalling hostility. The government probably won't murder them and probably won't let them starve, but if they meet the wrong group of citizens on a dark street, things can go very badly for them. It can also send them off to somehwere completely different on a whim.
'Voting' is right that is enshrined and protected by laws. Leaving because a situation has become intolerable is not the same thing. It's a massive category error. Like people fleeing bombing to refugee camps aren't foot voting except in the most prosaic sense.
the government was urging Russians to start growing their own bananas
And this is in the tropical part of Russia?
Yes, especially when we invite Russia's neighbors to join NATO.
What groups Russia's neighbors join is none of Russia's business.
You are a pathetic, un-American rube, Roger S.
Coupled with your bigotry, that makes you a natural member of this blog's right-wing audience.
October 1962 would like a word...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRYSKaS-XtQ
YOU’RE un-American, AIDS. (You’re anti-European as well.) You’re anti-democratic. You’re anti-truth. You’re anti-freedom. You’re a totalitarian.
Your posturing is now impotent, totalitarian bigot. Your American betters will tar and feather you.