The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Want Collateral to Ensure a Judgment Can Be Collected, Your Honor? No Problem—Use My NFT!
Judge Jed Rakoff (S.D.N.Y.), in today's Hermes Int'l v. Rothschild, isn't having it. First, the backstory from an earlier (May 2022) decision in the case:
Around December 2021, defendant Mason Rothschild created digital images of faux-fur-covered versions of the luxury Birkin handbags of plaintiffs Hermes International and Hermès of Paris, Inc. …. Rothschild titled these images "MetaBirkins" and sold them using so-called "NFTs" (non-fungible tokens), explained further below….
NFTs, or "non-fungible tokens," are units of data stored on a blockchain that are created to transfer ownership of either physical things or digital media. When NFTs are created, or "minted," they are listed on an NFT marketplace where NFTs can be sold, traded, etc., in accordance with "smart contracts" that govern the transfers. Because NFTs can be easily sold and resold with a transaction history securely stored on the blockchain, NFTs can function as investments that can store value and increase value over time.
When an NFT is linked to digital media, the NFT and corresponding smart contract are stored on the blockchain and are linked to digital media files (e.g., JPEG images, .mp4 video files, or .mp3 music files) to create a uniquely identifiable digital media file. The NFTs and smart contracts are stored on the blockchain (so that they can be traced), but the digital media files to which the NFTs point are stored separately, usually on either a single central server or a decentralized network.
Fashion brands are beginning to create and offer digital replicas of their real-life products to put in digital fashion shows or otherwise use in the metaverse. NFTs can link to any kind of digital media, including virtual fashion items that can be worn in virtual worlds online. Brands sometimes partner with collaborators in offering co-branded virtual fashion products.
Defendant Mason Rothschild is a "marketing strategist" and "Entrepreneur" who "come[s] from the fashion industry." In or around May 2021, Rothschild created a digital image entitled "Baby Birkin," which depicted a 40-week-old fetus gestating inside of a transparent Birkin handbag. Rothschild sold the NFT linked to the "Baby Birkin" digital image for $23,500; it later resold for $47,000.
In or around December 2021, Rothschild created a collection of digital images titled "MetaBirkins," each of which depicted an image of a blurry faux-fur-covered Birkin handbag. Rothschild used NFTs to sell these "MetaBirkins" digital images. Each NFT in the "MetaBirkins" collection is titled with a number from 0 to 99 and not the "MetaBirkins" name. The NFTs have sold for prices comparable to real-world Birkin handbags.
When Rothschild initially sold the NFTs of the "MetaBirkins" digital images, Rothschild described them as "a tribute to Herm[è]s' most famous handbag, the Birkin, one of the most exclusive, well-made luxury accessories. Its mysterious waitlist, intimidating price tags, and extreme scarcity have made it a highly covetable `holy grail' handbag that doubles as an investment or store of value." In an interview with Yahoo Finance about the "MetaBirkins" collection, Rothschild stated that "for me, there's nothing more iconic than the Herm[è]s Birkin bag. And I wanted to see as an experiment if I could create that same kind of illusion that it has in real life as a digital commodity." He went on to state that "there's not much difference" between owning a MetaBirkin and "having the crazy car or the crazy handbag in real life because it's kind of just that, that showing of like wealth or that kind of explanation of success"; that "now you're able to bring that into the metaverse with these iconic NFTs"; and that "I feel like the difference between the two is like getting a little bit blurred now because we have this new outlet, which is the metaverse, to showcase, showcase them in our virtual worlds, and even just show them online."
Rothschild has sold his "MetaBirkins" NFTs on four different NFT platforms. He has created social media and marketing channels: @METABIRKINS on Twitter and Instagram, MetaBirkins.com, and a "MetaBirkins" community on the Discord social platform. Rothschild's advertising for the "MetaBirkins" NFTs has included slogans such as "NOT YOUR MOTHER'S Birkin" and the hashtags "#MetaBirkins GONNA MAKE IT" and "#MINT A METABIRKIN HOLD A METABIRKIN." Rothschild has complained that he has seen his "MetaBirkin" NFTs being "counterfeited," and that he saw "more and more fake MetaBirkins sold every hour."
Consumers posting on the "MetaBirkins" Instagram page have expressed actual confusion, believing that there is an Hermès affiliation with Rothschild's "MetaBirkins" collection. Similar confusion exists in the media. For example, the magazines Elle and L'Officiel and the New York Post have all mistakenly reported that the "MetaBirkins" NFTs were unveiled by Hermès in partnership with Rothschild.
Now today's decision rejecting NFTs as security:
After a nine-day trial, a jury returned a unanimous verdict against the defendant, "Mason Rothschild" (real name: Sonny Estival), finding him liable for trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and cybersquatting, and awarding the plaintiffs -- Hermes International and Hermes of Paris, Inc. (collectively, "Hermes") $133,000 in damages.
Rothschild has appealed the adverse judgment, and briefing is underway before the Second Circuit. On December 12, 2023, Rothschild filed, with leave of Court, a letter motion asking this Court to stay collection of the money judgment against him, and waive the requirement to post a bond, during the pendency of the appeal….
[Federal Rule of Civil Procedure] 62(b) … provides that "[a]t any time after judgment is entered, a party may obtain a stay by providing a bond or other security" …. As applied in the context of a pending appeal, "[t]he purpose of [the Rule] is to ensure that the prevailing party will recover in full, if the decision should be affirmed, while protecting the other side against the risk that payment cannot be recouped if the decision should be reversed." "A district court therefore may, in its discretion, waive the bond requirement if the appellant provides an acceptable alternative means of securing the judgment."
Rothschild has not provided "an acceptable alternative means of securing the judgment" that would justify a stay of collection of the damages award. He proposes placing "in escrow both the MetaBirkins smart contract and the MetaBirkins NFT artwork owned by Mr. Rothschild as collateral to secure the judgment in lieu of a bond." But, in virtually the same breath, Rothschild concedes that he "is unaware of a way to place a monetary value on the MetaBirkins smart contract" and that "the NFT art market is virtually non-existent at the moment." Setting aside the irony that the MetaBirkins products are the very items that Rothschild used to infringe and dilute Hermes's trademark, there is no conceivable basis for concluding that valueless items are "an acceptable alternative means of securing" a $133,000 judgment….
Oren J. Warshavsky (Baker & Hostetler LLP) represents plaintiffs.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Future societies are going to look at stuff like this and say "Whiskey Tango Foxtrot..."
Imaginary stuff worth real money -- I'm reminded about what one of the robber barons said about the stock market in 1929 -- that when the shoeshine boy was giving him stock advice, it was time to get OUT and he did.
The thing about living in a gilded age is that no one realizes that they are living in one until after it is over. But when imaginary things are not only worth real money but increase in value, we're living in a gilded age....
It's just tulips all over again.
Except this time it's virtual tulips.
Which don't even look good in your yard.
"Imaginary stuff worth real money"
Which is also imaginary stuff. Most money is just encrypted data, with not even the intrinsic value of really good paper.
Just been denied. All my apes can’t replace bond. Please help me.
The really funny thing is that the NFT isn’t even the image or the URL itself, it’s just a deed that says whoever holds the token “owns” the associated URL. The URL could end up pointing to something entirely different than the image it did when the NFT was first sold. (The URL can also use IPFS to point to immutable content, as long as somebody in IPFS continues to host the file, but one needs to be somewhat savvy to tell the difference between that and a traditional URL.) The smart contract conveying the NFT also won’t reference any associated traditional contract spelling out what rights and obligations go along with the sale, such as how long the registrant for a traditional URL will maintain the content.
I love the fact that a Rothschild is running a scam. Global banking is a scam.
Isn't it one Sonny Estival, pretending to be a Rothschild?
Yeah I didn't really read beyond the first sentence or two.
Of course not.
You got what you wanted and skipped the rest.
"Rothschild" in this case is a pseudonym.
Unlike Philander Rodman, father of Dennis Rodman and 25 other children by a total of 16 mothers.
I vaguely remember something that the Internet thought amusing several years back where a man tried to pay with a bad drawing of a spider.
If that was Picasso, it might have been fine.
It wasn't: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/events/paying-bills-with-spider-drawings-seven-legged-spider
Kind of reminds me back during the dot.com boom arguing with one of my friends about stock valuations.
I said that stocks really need to pay a dividend to have value. He said why would you want a dividend when the reinvest the profits at a higher return.
I told him a stock that doesn't pay a dividend is like investing in Pokemon cards or Beanie Babies, they are only worth what someone else is willing to pay for them.
That said I did invest in all those dividendless stocks. I had a particular strategy selling Amazon covered calls, and I took my whole portfolio in my margin account, from 10k to 90k, despite one particularly bad day that I lost 30,000, before it rebounded.
By the time the bust had finished, I was back down 12k. Although I cashed in 14k in January 2000 to pay a hospital bill. I was too cheap to buy maternity coverage for my health insurance because I was 45 and my wife was 38.
So all I got out of the whole dot com boom was a kid. But he's doing well, I think he's helping to make anti-missile defenses for Israel for a US defense contractor, but he can't tell me what he doing because it's classified. But we talk sometimes about programming methodologies and algorithms.
Bottom line: NFT's and Crypto are Pokemon cards.
Amazon still hasn't paid any dividends. It was trading up to $106 during the dot-com period, and about $6 at the post-bubble low. After its 20:1 split, those shares are now worth a bit over $3000 each. I'll take that over, say, IBM and its price+dividend performance over the same time period.
However, I agree with you about NFTs and cryptocurrencies, although BTC and ETH don't look like they're going to burst any time soon.
Lesson from the mid 1980's real estate crash and the dot com bubble burst is that a business asset (stock, real estate operating company, etc ) is worth the present value of the future cash flows. Estimating the future cash flows is obviously difficult
I said that stocks really need to pay a dividend to have value. He said why would you want a dividend when the reinvest the profits at a higher return.
They have value if they pay dividends or are expected to pay them in the future. Companies do not have limitless opportunities for reinvestment. At some point they generate spare cash, which goes to dividends.
As Joe_dallas says, the value of the asset is the PV of future cash flows, though this was understood many decades before the 1980's.
These "virtual" handbags are the tip of the iceberg. Many role playing games allow the sale of weapons, clothing and other items. There are people who are designing these and going through game company (who makes a percentage) put them up for sale, making "real" money.
Unraveling a visual tapestry of immense beauty, I stumbled upon a stock photo masterpiece. Each image is a thread wedding invitation vector in this intricate weave, contributing to a canvas of creativity that is sure to leave a lasting impression on any viewer. It's a collection that transcends mere pictures and delves into the realm of visual poetry.
Viewing adult content is a personal choice and everyone’s comfort level is different. It’s important to consume it in moderation and make sure it doesn’t interfere with your daily life or relationships. If it becomes an addiction or begins to affect your daily responsibilities, that’s a red flag. For those looking for alternative ways to satisfy their curiosity, I would recommend exploring safer options, such as educational websites. If you enjoy watching such content, then you can visit hd porn . Every relationship is unique, so it’s important to openly discuss your feelings and concerns.
NFT is certainly interesting, but I’ll ask for a couple of hours, go to a casino where they offer a free bonus, let’s say Katsubet promo codes check it out and I’ll wager this bonus so that later I can cover the funds that the judge will oblige me to pay, but I hope this will never happen and I I’ll just play for fun, I don’t really want to sue anyone =)
Nedávno mi bola odporučená hazardná platforma, od ktorej sa jednoducho nemôžem odtrhnúť! Je to https://www.zahranicneonlinecasino.org/kasino/hellspin-casino - miesto, kde sa stretáva vzrušenie s pohodlím. Obrovský výber hier, štedré bonusy a úžasný dizajn vytvárajú atmosféru, do ktorej sa chcete vracať znova a znova. A rýchle výplaty a užívateľsky prívetivé rozhranie hru ešte viac spríjemňujú. Toto nie je len kasíno - je to skutočný svet vzrušujúcich dobrodružstiev, kde každé zatočenie prináša potešenie. Ak hľadáte niečo výnimočné, kasíno HellSpin rozhodne stojí za vyskúšanie!