The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Recalling "Learning in Wartime" in Wartime
For many, this past weekend's terrorist attacks on people in Israel and the resulting war between Israel and Hamas raises profound questions about the role of the academy in wartime.
In the midst of the Covd-19 pandemic, I had reason to recall C.S. Lewis' sermon, "Learning in Wartime," and I blogged about it. The events of the past week have caused me to revisit the essay and my comments, as they are both quite relevant to our current situation, so I am reposting my comments from March 2020.
* * *
The 9/11 attacks occurred when I was still a brand-spanking-new law professor, and they provoked quite a crisis of conscience. What was I doing ruminating about the finer points of administrative law or property-based environmental protection when so much more was at stake? What was I doing to help keep people safe and secure?
A colleague recommended I read "Learning in Wartime," a sermon delivered by C.S. Lewis in the fall of 1939. It was an excellent suggestion. Although I do not share Lewis' faith, I found it to be simultaneously comforting and inspiring—just what I needed at that moment.
The current situation prompted me to revisit the Lewis sermon, and I thought I would recommend it to our readers. Like Lewis' thought generally, the sermon is steeped in his faith, but I believe it has something to offer for theists and non-theists alike—or at least I hope so.
Here is how it begins:
A University is a society for the pursuit of learning. As students, you will be expected to make yourselves, or to start making yourselves, in to what the Middle Ages called clerks: into philosophers, scientists, scholars, critics, or historians. And at first sight this seems to be an odd thing to do during a great war. What is the use of beginning a task which we have so little chance of finishing? Or, even if we ourselves should happen not to be interrupted by death or military service, why should we -- indeed how can we -- continue to take an interest in these placid occupations when the lives of our friends and the liberties of Europe are in the balance? Is it not like fiddling while Rome burns?
And here is a brief portion of Lewis' answer.
. . . I think it important to try to see the present calamity in a true perspective, The war creates no absolutely new situation: it simply aggravates the permanent human situation so that we can no longer ignore it. Human life has always been lived on the edge of a precipice. Human culture has always had to exist under the shadow of something infinitely more important than itself. If men had postponed the search for knowledge and beauty until they were secure the search would never have begun. We are mistaken when we compare war with "normal life". Life has never been normal. Even those periods which we think most tranquil, like the nineteenth century, turn out, on closer inspection, to be full of cries, alarms, difficulties, emergencies. Plausible reasons have never been lacking for putting off all merely cultural activities until some imminent danger has been averted or some crying injustice put right. But humanity long ago chose to neglect those plausible reasons. They wanted knowledge and beauty now, and would not wait for the suitable moment that never come. Periclean Athens leaves us not only the Parthenon but, significantly, the Funeral Oration. The insects have chosen a different line: they have sought first the material welfare and security of the hive, and presumable they have their reward. Men are different.They propound mathematical theorems in beleaguered cities, conduct metaphysical arguments in condemned cells, make jokes on scaffold, discuss, the last new poem while advancing to the walls of Quebec, and comb their hair at Thermopylae. This is not panache; it is
our nature.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Wow.
The flip side of this is Ted Williams, who lost about 6 years of his career in first WWII and then Korea. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Williams#Military_service
Though certainly not the worst of its sins, the way that religion caused C.S. Lewis to waste his genius and his life is a true shame.
He was an abject failure – what a pity he didn’t make a success of his life like Friederich Nietzsche.
Well, I must say...The elite academies of America have not covered themselves in glory this week = pro-Hamas support rallies on 'elite' campuses in the wake of 1K Israelis murdered by Hamas terrorists inside Israel on Simchat Torah.
Hopefully, donors will take notice and close their wallets.
It will be interesting to see if the members of those student orgs that published open letters of support for Hamas and held pro-Hamas rallies even have to deal with being publicly identified. Let them come out into the light of day and speak loudly and proudly of their beliefs....and own them.
I for one, would like to know who those students are, so I never accidently offer them employment. Nobody with judgment that poor could ever work for me, or in my company. Really, that is what it comes down to (aside from a warped moral compass - separate topic). And if our clients became aware that one of those disgusting student antisemites was on the client team servicing the account, we would lose that client very quickly. Bill Ackman nailed that.
Truly, I hope these disgusting student antisemites are publicly identified. It is for this reason I support groups like Canary Mission; my next charitable donation is going to them. I would invite like-minded givers to take a look at Canary Mission. They name and shame antisemites in America academia by their social media posts, public statements, etc.
I'll reiterate something I said in another thread.
Are you sure *all* the membership of these student groups share the wicked views of the leadership? Don't you think that a student "leader" who is capable of justifying terrorism would be capable also of lying about the amount of support he has in his disgusting positions? The greater includes the less.
You ask a fair question. Anyone can renounce their membership. If a group no longer represents your beliefs, you leave.
May I suggest that the students who are members of those groups who no longer wish to associate with that antisemitism, make their denunciation and renouncing of membership loudly and proudly.
21:21 Meaning, the avant-garde security company, symbolizes a commitment to safeguarding with precision and foresight. Derived from the significance of the number 21, denoting vigilance and protection, coupled with the symmetry of 21:21 (https://newspodia.com/21-21/), the company epitomizes a perfect balance in security solutions. Specializing in cutting-edge technologies and innovative approaches, 21:21 Meaning delivers a harmonious blend of physical and digital security measures. Whether it's state-of-the-art surveillance systems or advanced access control, the company's focus on the profound meaning behind the numbers underscores its dedication to ensuring safety in an interconnected world. In a landscape where security is paramount, 21:21 Meaning stands as a beacon, offering a holistic and forward-thinking approach to safeguarding individuals and businesses alike.