The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Volokh Conspiracy Gets Results on Immigration and Zoning Policy
Federal and New York City officials recently adopted policy changes on migrant work permits and zoning reform similar to those advocated here (though probably not because I advocated them!)..

On August 17, I wrote a Volokh Conspiracy post explaining how New York City's migrant shelter crisis could be alleviated by a combination of letting migrants work legally and cutting back on zoning rules that block construction of new housing. Less than a month later, on September 20, the Biden administration granted Temporary Protected Status (TPS) to almost 500,000 Venezuelan migrants in the United States; Venezuelans are a large proportion of new migrants in New York and other major cities. And TPS includes the right to work legally. Administration officials must have read my post and seen the light!
The day after the feds announced their new Venezuelan TPS policy, New York City Mayor Eric Adams proposed the most sweeping NYC zoning reform in many decades. If enacted by the New York city council, it would allow the construction of many thousands of new housing units throughout the City, by - among other things - allowing construction of larger apartment buildings, letting homeowners add second units on their lots, and scrapping parking mandates for new housing construction. Adams' speech announcing the proposal forcefully denounces exclusionary zoning and explains how it stifles development, promotes racial segregation, and harms immigrants and natives alike. He must be a regular VC reader, too! I've been saying these sorts of things for years.
In reality, it's highly unlikely my advocacy had any meaningful effect on either Biden's actions or Adams'. The former is likely the result of sustained pressure by various Democratic officials and policy experts (including Mayor Adams), who have been pushing Biden to let asylum-seeking migrants have immediate access for work permits (as opposed to the traditional policy of making them wait six months or more). Adams' policy is part of a broader struggle over exclusionary zoning being waged across the country. But, whatever the reason, it's a good thing Biden and Adams took these important steps in the right direction.
But much more remains to be done. Venezuelans are not the only migrants fleeing horrible violence and socialist oppression who need work permits in order to support themselves and benefit our economy. Many Cubans, Nicaraguans, and others are in much the same position. Biden should grant TPS status to them, as well.
In the long run, Congress should pass adjustment acts giving these groups permanent residency and work rights, as has been done for many others fleeing war and oppressive socialist regimes in the past. That will benefit the migrants themselves, bolster the US economy, and strengthen our position in the international war of ideas against socialist dictatorships and other enemies.
On the zoning side, I am not sure that Adams' proposed reforms go far enough. It would be better to simply allow property owners to build whatever kinds of housing they want, subject to minimum safety and public health standards. That would enable significantly more construction than Adams' more limited (though still extensive) proposals. It would also be a valuable boost to property rights. In New York, as in many other jurisdictions, zoning restrictions are the single biggest constraint on property owners' rights to use their land as they see fit.
Finally, as noted in my August post, NYC would also do well to end its guaranteed shelter policy, which creates bad incentives for migrants and native-born Americans alike. Rather than offering free shelter at taxpayer expense, local and federal governments should instead let people work to support themselves, and let property owners build new housing to accommodate them. Both Adams and New York Governor Kathy Hochul have come out in favor of ending or at least limiting the shelter guarantee. Hopefully, that policy will be curtailed and eventually phased out.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Good. Now we can send ALL the migrants to NYC, since they can handle them.
" (though probably not because I advocated them!).."
Did Josh Blackman write this?
No, Josh never passes up an opportunity to claim credit, just like the rooster who believes it's his crow that makes the sun rise.
“New York City’s migrant shelter crisis could be alleviated by a combination of letting migrants work legally …” Sure, put them to work building the wall and send them back just before the last section is finished.
What's missing is any awareness of how wrong it is that these level of changes can be done by executive order or agency rule change.
In the case of the Biden Administration granting TPS, that power was given to him by Congress in the Immigration Act of 1990. As for Mayor Adams in NYC:
"New York City Mayor Eric Adams proposed the most sweeping NYC zoning reform in many decades. If enacted by the New York city council..."
Would you also be perfectly fine with Congress passing the equivalent of Hitler's 1933 Enabling Act? Would it matter who was President, Biden or Trump, or anyone else?
Presidents do not have that power by any reasonable reading of the Constitution. Alas, that horse left the barn ages ago.
Are you suggesting that a President’s only constitutionally permissable response to a nuclear first strike would be to attempt to convene Congress and obtain a declaration of war?
Congress has delegated its power to repel invasions to the President since the Founding. It delegated its power to put down insurrections – the President invokes the Insurrection Act when he thinks an insurrection has occurred, he doesn’t ask Congress for any new permission. Congress can certainly delegate its considerably lesser foreign policy power to allow or prohibit classes of would-be immigrants. And that’s exactly what it did.
All Constitutional. And part of our law since the Founding.
Venezuelans are not the only nationality fleeing a low minimum wage.... It's just so much higher in the US, even higher than the other nearby countries (Columbia, Chile, Peru, Brazil) where they were perfectly safe.
Minimum wage in Venezuela is currently sitting at $0.86 USD (yes, I put in both $ and USD for clarity)...a month. Current US minimum wage is $7.25...an hour. Can you imagine increasing your income by more than 1000-fold? Of course they'd want to move to the US. Having zero barriers would just encourage more "asylum" immigration.
Sure though, Venezuela's an extreme case. But Brazil? Minimum wage of $1.39 an hour. Peru? $0.91 an hour. Imagine increasing your salary 5-7 fold...just by moving locations. And I'm not even accounting for the local minimum wage in a place like NYC.
It's a no brainer. Especially if there are no real work limitations. Come to the US. Claim "fear". Immediately start working. Make bank....7 times what you were making before. You offer that same deal to most US citizens...move locations to this other country, make 7 times what you're making now...many would immediately take you up on the offer
Yeah, go to Brazil and ask a rando on the street why they don't go to America.
Sure to work out great for you.
Money is not the only motive in people's lives.
Let’s ignore the huge cost of living differences and the language barrier. Few of these immigrants will be living large.
I'm confused (as usual), didn't New Yawk Governor Kathy Horse-face say they should stay in Texas?? (They should, actually)
In an age of increasing use of AI and automation, how many jobs to you think there realistically are for 500,00+ unskilled manual laborers who largely don’t speak English?
Have some faith in capitalism. LLMs and AIs right now are hardly automating much for the working class.
We're seeking jobs badly right now in plenty of sectors, many of which are not consumer facing.
And there's always the old standby of agribusiness.
When did the subject veer toward most of the residents (rural residents, especially) of West Virginia, Alabama, Idaho, Oklahoma, Mississippi, Arkansas, Tennessee, Kentucky, South Carolina, west Texas, Louisiana . . .
FACT CHECK: West Virginia has the same literacy rate as New York...Alabama, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Idaho, Tennessee, South Carolina, and West Virginia are all more literate than California.
The least literate area of Texas is not West Texas, but the border with Mexico. California, New Mexico, and Arizona all have their least literate county on the border with Mexico.
The least literate area of Mississippi is not its most rural counties, but the Delta. The same goes for Louisiana--the least literate counties are by the river, not in the most rural counties.
The rural states of Wyoming, Montana, South Dakota, Alaska, Vermont, Maine, North Dakota, and Idaho are all in the top half of states for literacy.
Consider yourself DEBUNKED. Take your bigoted misinformation to a less discerning blog.
SOURCES:
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Program for the International Assessment of Adult
Competencies (PIAAC), 2012/2014/2017.
USAfacts.org. Which states have the highest and lowest adult literacy rates? 8/21/2023.
What makes you think that people fleeing collapsing economies like Venezuela are necessarily "unskilled"?
Many of these people were professionals in their respective countries, but their skills require additional credentialing for them to use those skills here. Or they had their own businesses in their home countries before making the difficult decision to uproot their families and seek security elsewhere. They may lack English skills, but there are plenty of Americans who speak their language.
Dispense with your self-serving caricatures and you might be able to have a serious discussion about immigration policy.
Good job, now fix everything else. You know, since you fixed this.
We'll see how Adams's proposal on eliminating parking minimum plays out in progress.
Something important to keep in mind, when it comes to NYC policy, is that every regulation serves two purposes - one, in actually regulating a given behavior, and the other, in providing the city government leverage over persons seeking exemptions or variances from those regulations. Zoning is a particularly patent example of this. Developers seeking to build more units than otherwise permitted, or higher, or with less parking, etc., than they are permitted "as of right," must go to city government and request a variance. In order to get that variance, the city routinely negotiates some kinds of concessions - e.g., more "affordable" housing, a revamped entrance to the subway, a public plaza, etc.
So, there is a reason that Adams has suggested eliminating parking minimums but not going further to try to incentivize building even more homes. Similarly, we can expect the ordinance adopted by the city council, and subsequent administration, to fall short of the sort of liberalization one might otherwise hope for. There are sure to be plenty of rules, still, and a process to try to avoid their application.
What's the endgame of importing millions of people from every shithole country in the world to compete with American workers?
Hope and fundamental change as per Obama.
Like your country the way it is?...too bad, so sad
That's nothing. Watch this.
I think the government should further increase spending and debt over time. This is a good thing to do, because reasons.
And they should continue centralizing power in Washington D.C. in other ways, too. It's good to have all political and social issues, over as large and diverse of a portion of the globe as possible, ostensibly compacted into a single false choice in the form of an election between uniparty candidates.
Wait and see how they listen to me . . .