The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
"I Propose a March to Washington" - from my Commonplace Book
A rather striking harbinger of the '63 March in Carson McCullers' "The Heart is a Lonely Hunter"
I recently finished reading Carson McCullers' great 1940 novel, "The Heart is a Lonely Hunter" - a real masterpiece, by the way, and one I highly recommend - and I was startled to read the following passage, which I pass along to mark the 60th anniversary (yesterday) of the March on Washington.
The context: the book describes life in a small town in the Deep South in the 1930s through the eyes of five main characters: John Singer, a deaf-mute employed as a jewelry engraver; Mick Kelly, a 13 year-old girl; Jake Blount, a drifter/labor agitator; Biff Brannon, the owner of a local cafe; and Benedict Copeland, an elderly African-American doctor.
Copeland is consumed by bitterness and rage - rage at what white society had done and was doing to his people, rage at his fellow blacks who submit to these outrages, and rage at his own inability to alleviate their suffering or effect meaningful change. He and Blount, the labor agitator, confront one another towards the end of the book, after a particularly searing episode of racial violence at the local jail. They both agree: conditions have become intolerable, and something must be done. No more "prudence." Copeland says:
In the face of brutality I was prudent. Before injustice I held my peace. I sacrificed the things in hand for the good of the hypothetical whole. I believed in the tongue instead of the fist. As an armor against oppression I taught patience and faith in the human soul. I know now how wrong I was. I have been a traitor to myself and to my people. All that is rot. Now is the time to act and to act quickly. Fight cunning with cunning and might with might.
"How?" Blount asks. Copeland continues:
By getting out and doing things. By calling crowds of people together and getting them to demonstrate. … I have a program. It is a very simple, concentrated plan. I mean to focus on only one objective. In August of this year I plan to lead more than one thousand Negroes in this country on a march. A march to Washington. All of us together in one solid body. If you will look in the cabinet yonder you will see a stack of letters which I have written this week and will deliver personally.
Blount wants no part of it:
That's not the right angle at all. In the first place, you'd never get out of town. They'd break it up, saying it's a menace to public health - or some such trumped-up reason. But even if you got to Washington it wouldn't do a bit of good. The whole notion is crazy. … Who cares whether you and your thousand Negroes straggle up to that stinking cesspool of a place called Washington? What difference does it make? What do a few people matter - a few thousand people, black, white, good, or bad? When the whole of our society is built on a foundation of lies?
Pretty amazing, for 1940. In a book written by a previously-unknown white Southern woman who was, at the time she submitted the book for publication, all of 22 years old!
And at the risk of gross over-simplification, I think it fair to say that Copeland's idea ultimately prevailed - people did care, it did matter, and it accomplished considerably more than a bit of good.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
In WWII, merely threatening a march got some improvements re black jobs in in govt contracting.
I saw the film with Alan Arkin and Sandra Locke long before I read the novel or her other works. Another southern author who confronted many of the same issues as McCullers would be Flannery O'Connor. Interesting that both suffered long-term health issues.
Doesn't fit with the Reverend Sandusky-Kirtland's Bitter/Klinger accusations, but had to read this in 11th grade "Advanced" Engrish in Alabama, along with "To Kill a Mockingbird", "The Sound & the Fury" and "Lord Jim". We got to pick one book on our own to do a report on for the class, Dowdy Mrs. Livingston didn't like my choice of "Tropic of Cancer" at all...
*That's why I can't spell or punctuate, we spent all of Engrish class reading books.
Frank
"That's not the right angle at all. In the first place, you'd never get out of town. They'd break it up, saying it's a menace to public health—or some such trumped-up reason."
Two words: January 6th....
They did a pretty good job of breaking that up -- letting it get out of hand and then crucifying everyone involved.
Just sayin....
Dr. Ed 2 still desperately rooting for civil war.
There were only a few thousand insurrectionists at January 6th; given the population increase from 1940 to now, that's slightly less than Copeland's thousand. But nobody blocked or broke up the larger "Save America" rally that preceded the insurrection. The insurrection was broken up because they were committing crimes. While the insurrectionists were "trumped-up", it wasn't the people who opposed them who did that, nor who let them get out of hand.
Some did.
Some still don't.
By today's standards MLK Jr. was a right wing Nazi White Supremercist, "Content of their Character"??? They''ll be judged on their skin color, and degree of skin color, light skinned Blacks like Barry Hussein good, Dark Skinned Blacks like Clarence Thomas bad!.
Frank
Some people only know one MLK quote and shockingly, its the one they think gets the US off the hook for systemic racism.
They think the real reason MLK was marching was to protest "reverse racism."
Since "Reverse Racism" is just Racism, he was.
We don’t honor King as a socialist, we honor him for helping topple Jim Crow and getting killed because of it.
Just as we don’t honor Susan B. Anthony for getting support from the racist George Francis Train, we honor her is spite of that little pecadillo.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/susan-anthony-getting-support-revolution-taking-on-an-unusual-ally-180958480/
Imagine criticisng King for being a socialist in a capitalist country that had visited the most brutal opression on him and his people.
I have argued that Jackie Robinson was as important to the success of the Civil Rights Movement as any other person, maybe even including MLK himself.
Ridgeway: I'm not sure I'd put Jackie Robinson quite at MLK's level, but I completely agree with you that his impact on race relations in this country was immense and probably under-appreciated. I'm particularly fascinated by Robinson; I grew up in Brooklyn in the 50s, and to call Robinson a local hero in my neighborhood VASTLY understates his stature. The Dodgers left when I was six - don't get me started on that - but the year before I actually met Robinson and shook his hand, and I remember it as pretty much the most exciting thing ever. The guy was a true giant - talk about the content of his character! Amazing.
But, according to the race hustlers and grifters, things are way worse now. Before, we just had racism. Now we have institutionalized racism. That March on Washington failed, don't you see? Despite what your eyes see and your brain understands. The race hustlers have done such harm to this nation and this culture. Shame on the media for amplifying their voices.
The Volokh Conspiracy: Official Legal Blog of White Grievance
things are way worse now
No one says this.
The race hustlers in your head sure seem to have done damage to your connection to reality.
You can't reason with bigotry, superstition, or belligerent ignorance. It is pointless -- perhaps even counterproductive -- to try.
No harm in mocking the clingers, though!
'But, according to the race hustlers and grifters, things are way worse now.'
Yes, white race hustlers and grifters claim they're living under Jim Crow for whites these days, which is worse than Jim Crow for blacks, because they're white.
David Post,
Thanks for pointing this out. The novel has been on my longlist of "to read" for awhile, this is the push to at least get it on my shortlist.
NOVA Lawyer: I really did think it was a pretty astonishing book - hope you like it (if/when it makes it to the top of your list).