The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
"40 Officers of China's National Police Charged in Transnational Repression Schemes Targeting U.S. Residents"
"Defendants accused of creating fake social media accounts to harass PRC dissidents, and working with employees of a U.S. telecommunications company to remove dissidents from company's platform."
From a Justice Department statement released yesterday:
Two criminal complaints filed by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York were unsealed today in federal court in Brooklyn charging 44 defendants with various crimes related to efforts by the national police of the People's Republic of China (PRC)—the Ministry of Public Security (MPS)—to harass Chinese nationals residing in the New York metropolitan area and elsewhere in the United States. The defendants, including 40 MPS officers and two officials in the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), allegedly perpetrated transnational repression schemes targeting U.S. residents whose political views and actions are disfavored by the PRC government, such as advocating for democracy in the PRC.
In the two schemes, the defendants created and used fake social media accounts to harass and intimidate PRC dissidents residing abroad and sought to suppress the dissidents' free speech on the platform of a U.S. telecommunications company (Company-1). The defendants charged in these schemes are believed to reside in the PRC or elsewhere in Asia and remain at large.
"These cases demonstrate the lengths the PRC government will go to silence and harass U.S. persons who exercise their fundamental rights to speak out against PRC oppression, including by unlawfully exploiting a U.S.-based technology company," said Assistant Attorney General Matthew G. Olsen of the Justice Department's National Security Division. "These actions violate our laws and are an affront to our democratic values and basic human rights."
"China's Ministry of Public Security used operatives to target people of Chinese descent who had the courage to speak out against the Chinese Communist Party—in one case by covertly spreading propaganda to undermine confidence in our democratic processes and, in another, by suppressing U.S. video conferencing users' free speech," said Acting Assistant Director Kurt Ronnow of the FBI Counterintelligence Division. "We aren't going to tolerate CCP repression—its efforts to threaten, harass, and intimidate people—here in the United States. The FBI will continue to confront the Chinese government's efforts to violate our laws and repress the rights and freedoms of people in our country." …
United States v. Yunpeng Bai, et al.
The two-count complaint charges 34 MPS officers with conspiracy to transmit interstate threats and conspiracy to commit interstate harassment. All the defendants are believed to reside in the PRC, and they remain at large.
As alleged, the officers worked with Beijing's MPS bureau and are or were assigned to an elite task force called the "912 Special Project Working Group" (the Group). The purpose of the Group is to target Chinese dissidents located throughout the world, including in the United States.
"As alleged, the PRC government deploys its national police and the 912 Special Project Working Group not as an instrument to uphold the law and protect public safety, but rather as a troll farm that attacks persons in our country for exercising free speech in a manner that the PRC government finds disagreeable, and also spreads propaganda whose sole purpose is to sow divisions within the United States," said U.S. Attorney Breon Peace for the Eastern District of New York. "I commend the investigative team for comprehensively revealing the insidiousness of a state-directed criminal scheme directed at residents of the United States."
The complaint alleges how members of the Group created thousands of fake online personas on social media sites, including Twitter, to target Chinese dissidents through online harassment and threats. These online personas also disseminated official PRC government propaganda and narratives to counter the pro-democracy speech of the Chinese dissidents. As alleged, for example, Group members created and maintained the fake social media accounts through temporary email addresses, posted official PRC government content, and interacted with other online users to avoid the appearance that the Group accounts were "flooding" a given social media platform. The Group tracks the performances of members in fulfilling their online responsibilities and rewards Group members who successfully operate multiple online personas without detection by the social media companies who host the platforms or by other users of the platforms.
The investigation also uncovered official MPS taskings to Group members to compose articles and videos based on certain themes targeting, for example, the activities of Chinese dissidents located abroad or the policies of the U.S. government.
As alleged, the defendants also attempted to recruit U.S. persons to act as unwitting agents of the PRC government by disseminating propaganda or narratives of the PRC government. On several occasions, the defendants used online personas to contact individuals assessed to be sympathetic and supportive of the PRC government's narratives and asked these individuals to disseminate Group content.
In addition, Group members took repeated affirmative actions to have Chinese dissidents and their meetings removed from the platform of Company-1. For example, Group members disrupted a dissident's efforts to commemorate the Tiananmen Square Massacre through a videoconference by posting threats against the participants through the platform's chat function. In another Company-1 videoconference on the topic of countering communism organized by a PRC dissident, Group members flooded the videoconference and drowned out the meeting with loud music and vulgar screams and threats directed at the pro-democracy participants.
United States v. Julien Jin, et al.
This amended complaint charges 10 individuals, including a former PRC-based Company-1 employee, six MPS officers, and two officials with the CAC, with conspiracy to commit interstate harassment and unlawful conspiracy to transfer means of identification. Nine of the defendants are believed to reside in the PRC and remain at large. The tenth defendant is believed to reside in Indonesia or the PRC and also remains at large.
"The amended complaint charging a former PRC-based employee of a U.S. telecommunications company illustrates the insider threat faced by U.S. companies operating in the PRC," said First Assistant U.S. Attorney Pokorny for the Eastern District of New York, who thanked Company-1 for its cooperation in the government's investigation. "As alleged, Julien Jin and his co-conspirators in the Ministry of Public Security and Cyberspace Administration of China weaponized the U.S. telecommunications company he worked for to intimidate and silence dissenters and enforce PRC law to the detriment of Chinese activists in New York, among other places, who had sought refuge in this country to peacefully express their pro-democracy views."
"These cases demonstrate that the Chinese Communist Party, once again, attempted to intimidate, harass, and suppress Chinese dissidents in the United States," said Assistant Director in Charge David Sundberg of the FBI Washington Field Office. "In the United States, the freedom of speech is a cornerstone of our democracy, and the FBI will work tirelessly to defend everyone's right to speak freely without fear of retribution from the CCP. These complex investigations revealed an MPS-wide effort to repress individuals by using the U.S. communications platform and fake social media accounts to censor political and religious speech."
In December 2020, the Department first announced charges against Julien Jin in connection with his efforts to disrupt a series of meetings on the Company-1 platform held in May and June 2020 commemorating the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre. Jin served as Company-1's primary liaison with PRC government law enforcement and intelligence services. In that capacity, he regularly responded to requests from the PRC government to terminate meetings and block users on Company-1's video communications platform.
As detailed in the original complaint, Jin and others conspired to use Company-1's U.S. systems to censor the political and religious speech of individuals located in the United States and elsewhere at the direction of the PRC government. For example, Jin and others disrupted meetings held on the Company-1 platform to discuss politically sensitive topics unacceptable to the PRC government—including the Tiananmen Square Massacre. Jin and his co-conspirators fabricated evidence of purported misconduct to cause U.S.-based employees of Company-1 to terminate the meetings.
The allegations in the amended complaint reveal that Jin worked directly with and took orders from defendants at the MPS and the CAC to disrupt meetings on the Company-1 platform and that the co-defendants had targeted U.S.-based dissidents' speech on Company-1's platform since 2018.
Starting in 2018, Jin and his co-defendants repeatedly sought to terminate video chat meetings organized by a Chinese dissident residing in New York City who has been a vocal critic of the PRC government and the Chinese Communist Party. After the CAC requested that Company-1 terminate the dissident's meetings on the Company-1 platform, Jin worked to identify all accounts associated with the dissident, caused meetings related to the dissident to be hosted in a "quarantine zone"—that is, on a server with known lags in response time—and later worked to block all accounts associated with the dissident. Similarly, in 2019, Jin collaborated with the MPS and CAC to block accounts seeking to commemorate the Tiananmen Square Massacre.
The FBI Washington Field Office investigated the cases.
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Alexander A. Solomon, Antoinette N. Rangel, Ian C. Richardson, Nicholas J. Moscow and Jessica K. Weigel of the Eastern District of New York, and Trial Attorney Scott A. Claffee of the National Security Division's Counterintelligence and Export Control Section are prosecuting the cases.
The FBI has created a website for victims to report efforts by foreign governments to stalk, intimidate, or assault people in the United States. Please visit: www.fbi.gov/investigate/counterintelligence/transnational-repression.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Has China been added to the transgender-Muslim-lesbian-drag queen list?
Is this a new area of study Prof. Volokh finds "interesting" (apparently replacing defamation and free expression)?
The Culture War winners were allowing China to run their own police station in the US.
The Biden administration seems to have put a stop to it.
The Trump administration, apparently, did not.
Other than that, great comment!
"Seems" is the Operative Word there Coach,
and Jerry, you're posting more stupid shit in an afternoon than Congressman Hank Johnson (D) GA, has said in a Lifetime, which is saying something, as he's the one who was worried Guam would "Capsize" (It won't)
Got a little of the Butt-Hurt from Ja'hulio or whoever your latest cellmate is? Like the stand up desks myself, but c'mon (man!)
Frank
Where was this police station? It appears that all of the 44 defendants are in PRC (or one may be in Indonesia).
https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/2-arrested-for-allegedly-operating-illegal-chinese-police-station-in-nyc-sources-say/4247736/
Related.
The Democrats in the State Department and other Soro’s funded agencies didn’t want you to know about it. That’s why you didn’t know about it.
Hmm; I had indeed missed that story, even though it's on most mainstream media. The one place it's not reported where I undoubtedly would have seen it? It's not in this post here that I did read, even though it seems quite related. Probably George Soros paid Eugene not mention it.
This story is pretty widespread, because they suddenly decided to do something about this particular 'station'. But these 'police stations' have been around for years, they're all over the country. And how much coverage did it get before they decided they had to move against one? Next to none.
Then how do you know about them?
Sheesh, you really want to deny that anything short of 100% successful suppression of a story means it wasn't suppressed at all? I knew about it because of the difference between "none" and "next to none".
Through the BBC, for instance: Reports of Chinese police stations in US worry FBI
Full List of China's Unofficial Police Stations Around the World
I should note, I had to use DuckDuckGo to find these stories, on Google they were buried.
Media suppression isn't a binary thing, the goal of it isn't to make it literally impossible to find out about something. Rather, the point is to make it hard enough to find out about it that, instead of the story snowballing, it dies down.
It's similar to a nuclear reaction: Slap together a critical mass of pure U235, and it blows up a city. Take the same mass, and add a neutron poison to make sure that each fission reaction causes less than one additional reaction, and it barely gets warm.
Modern censors don't aim for 100% censorship. They aim for enough censorship to get the job done, while leaving enough of a leak that people like you can rationalize that there isn't really any suppression going on.
Maybe they can put out an "APB"
"BOLO for 44 Chinese, in China, may appear Chinese"
Remember how they did something similar with the Russian election hoax?
If you work for the federal government and live in or near DC, you are a vile piece of shit.
You mean the time they charged the Wagner Group guy's company with operating a bot farm in Petrograd, indicted all sorts of Russians in Russia, conveniently unavailable to prosecute, and then were unwilling to proceed with anything when that company's lawyers showed up in court here?
"Prosecution" and propaganda by press release: Your FBI at work.
From The New York Times:
This is great news.
And even more for the Volokh Conspiracy to ignore!
They're also ignoring our Culture War Betters at the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the Joint UN Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), the UN Development Programme (UNDP), and World Health Organization (WHO) announcing that having sex with children is perfectly acceptable.
Of course it's to support LBGTQP+.
So the Dominion lawsuit had pretty much the same ending as the Sandman one. Interesting.
Yes, pretty much the same ending, plus about 6 zeros.
Well, wapo won't tell us how many zeros he got.
Yeah, well, when it's easy to get big settlements when the entire justice system does the bidding of the left.
George Zimmerman's legitimate defamation suit against the media for editing the tapes to make it sound like "He looks like he's up to no good...he's black" was dismissed.
The justice system in this country only works for blacks, Jews, homosexuals, and Muslims.
And rich elite Democrats like those on Epstein's list.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/18/politics/white-nationalist-charges-university-of-virginia-rally/index.html
Here's an example. 6 years after the fact.
"A Newsmax spokesperson said that they believe “the facts at issue in Dominion’s case against it are materially different from those that may have driven Fox to settle, and no conclusion about Newsmax should be drawn from that settlement. Newsmax stands by its coverage and analysis of the 2020 election and will continue to vigorously defend against the claim.”
As I said several years back, when claims of
FRAUD AT POLLS!
were rampant, everybody gets their day in court.
I waited. And waited. And waited. What turned out to be lying fraudsters had no real evidence, and then fed the lie to their echo chamber that they were suppressed in court! Never mind the President of the United States is the top law enforcer, and has the biggest microphone on the planet, and could rip it wide open for hours a day. So they didn’t need court to produce the evidence.
Nevermind in one or two cases, the judge said, eh, I’ll bite. Show me the money. “Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?”
“Yes.”
“What happened? What evidence?”
“Well…”
“Remember you go to jail if you lie.”
“Mmmm…not much, we’ve got nothing.”
Everybody gets their day in court. I just didn’t realize how deep the rabbit hole went as to who would end up in court.
Wow, imagine if the Chinks had unleashed a deadly Virus upon the World (HT Jon Stewart/CIA) They'd get a Strongly Worded Letter!!
According to testimony today, they did and the US funded it, and Fauci declared it a hoax because he was the one who funded it.
And the bootlickers being what they are never ever questioned him.
Can this white, male, conservative, Federalist Society, Republican, faux libertarian blog get through a 12-hour period without publishing a bigoted comment?
Could Jerry Sandusky go 12 hours without diddyling boys? (I mean before you were confined at https://www.cor.pa.gov/Facilities/StatePrisons/Pages/Greene.aspx
But hey, your only hope at Commutation, Senator S-S-S-S-t-t-tuttering John Fetterman is back from his "Treatment"
looks like he's lost some weight, which in Stroke patients is not usually a favorable finding,
Frank
You, Frank Drackman, are the defender this blog deserves.
After watching the DeSantis campaign video staking claim to the cruelty-and-bigotry wing of the Republican Party, I expect to learn that Prof. Eugene Volokh and a few other Volokh Conspirators have joined the DeSantis campaign.
Carry on, clingers. So far as your better permit, that is.
These mentally ill people are a menace to society, and need to be neutralized.
Does anyone here seriously think this CCP operation was just isolated to NYC?
Knowing what we know about the Biden's, they are probably operating one inside the White House.
No, I think every college town in America likely has one.
It'd be irresponsible NOT to speculate!
No. The FBI raided PRC "police" setups in several cities, among them Minneapolis and Omaha, and on both the left and the right coast. Seems pretty widespread to me.
Brazen. I will say that. The CCP are brazen.
"said Acting Assistant Director Kurt Ronnow of the FBI Counterintelligence Division. We aren't going to tolerate CCP repression—its efforts to threaten, harass, and intimidate people"
That's the FBI's job in the US!
That was my reaction to his words, exactly.
Who is Company 1, the telecom involved?
And why are they hiring Chines Communists in Indonesia to monitor NYC chat rooms?
Why did the OPM hire Chinese programmers in China to do remote database management? Same reason, I expect: We're deeply penetrated by Chinese intelligence services.
This is just as stupidly futile as when they did it to Russians a few years back. The idea that US law applies to foreign government employees working in their own countries is utterly mad.
We might be able to get away with it anyway in the case of some pipskweak 3rd world country that desperately needs our goodwill, and can't really do anything if we kidnap some of their employees to bring to the US for trial, but that wasn't even Russia, and sure as heck isn't China.
The Chinese police station in NYC is a quite different matter. Those have been around for a while, and our government has been treating them like surveillance balloons: Noting that they're there, and hoping like hell the American people doesn't notice them, because that might force them to actually do something about them, and they don't want to, for reasons that doubtless wouldn't bear examination.
Manuel Noriega would like a word with you.
Yeah, and when we invade China that might be relevant. I explicitly said that we could get away with it with countries we were in a position to bully, and not otherwise.
Care to remind us what specifically he was charge with? Because I don't think it was spreading foreign government propaganda or intimidating U.S. persons.
So you're okay with a person running for office on the basis that he'll bring charges for a questionable, minor crime, that his predecessor decided not to prosecute, six years after the fact?
You and pond scum like you who detest American values belong in gas chambers, choking on Zyklon B.
I suppose you wouldn't have let them march in Skokie, either?
I want Nazis to enjoy the same rights I do, because in the end I'm only going to get to enjoy the rights they get, too: Once we establish you lose your rights by having unpopular opinions, well, somebody's bound to find mine unpopular.
Facts matter -- I believe he was.
Thank you for demonstrating anew the truthiness of Prof. Volokh's claims that censored liberals and libertarians for lack of compliance with his "civility standards" for this blog.
This blog censors people for making fun of and criticizing right-wingers but these things regularly get the matador treatment from the Volokh Conspiracy Board of Censors:
vile racial slurs
calls for liberal judges to be gassed
calls for liberals to be shot in the face (when opening doors)
calls for liberals to be raped
homophobic slurs
calls for liberals to be placed face-down in landfills
calls for liberals to choke on Zyklon or be sent to Zyklon showers
If you want to try to defend yourself, Prof. Volokh, let's hear your explanation.
Where are all the conservatives who deny that the Volokh Conspiracy's right-wing commenters regularly talk about killing liberals, starting a race war, habitually use racial and homophobic slurs, etc.?
Cowards.
Hypocrites.
The lizard people are preventing the Volokh Conspiracy from talking about Fox News, Dominion Systems, Sidney Powell, Smartmatic, Rudy Giuliani, Mike Lindell, Rupert Murdoch, Sean Hannity, Lou Dobbs, Maria Bartiromo, Laura Ingraham, Ralph Yarl, Ron DeSantis, Donald Trump, Andrew Lester, Clarence Thomas, Nazi artifacts, Ginni Thomas, etc.?
Are you sure it isn’t partisan cowardice with sides of gun nuttery and intolerance?
Nothing is stopping you from saying something of substance, except that that is SO far outside your lane.
It's quite telling how Kirkland and BCD sound exactly like each other.
I agree that one must follow procedure including protecting rights even for Nazis.
But are you arguing that the crime here is actually protected speech? Or that this is past the statute of limitations? Or that this is abuse of discretion?
Because from the article, this seems within the wickets to me, and the Nazi guy is just salty that his fellow Nazis are in trouble.
If you're going to have an informal 'statute of limitations', it should apply regardless of the politics of the perp, or else you're punishing the politics, and just using an offense you would otherwise have ignored as an excuse to do it.
It's a multitude of factors. First, Virginia v. Black made clear that cross burning is only punishable if the state proves intent to intimidate. That is going to be true if you burn a cross on someone's lawn (or next to it). These guys were marching. Who were they intending to intimidate?
Second, it's a very bad look for someone to run for office on the grounds that he'll prosecute one particular case. That's not the way this is supposed to work. Prosecutors have discretion. Overriding your predecessor's discretion, six years after the fact, for a minor violation (assuming that it's not protected speech) is pure abuse of discretion.
Is there an informal statute of limitations, or are you just assuming such?
I agree politics should not be driving things, but lets be realistic here - politics are going to be a thing and have always been a thing in prosecutions.
Treating informal policies as formal is not really how it works - they're informal for a reason. How many exceptions must be made before it's back to counting as informal?
You're still fighting a battle won long ago. It's safe to fight the Nazis instead.
I expected your defense of the Conspiracy's cowardice to be much more forceful than that.
You're starting to remind me of Steve Lawrence and Edie Gorme. You should hope Prof. Volokh doesn't see it similarly.