The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
My Comment on the OMB's Proposal to Turn "Hispanic" into a Race
The federal Office of Management and Budget has requested comments on several proposals to change the official federal racial and ethnic classifications. One proposal is to merge the ethnic question (are you Hispanic/Latino or not?) with the racial one (are you black/African American, white, Asian American, or Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander?), so individiuals would now be asked whether they are Hispanic, black, whites, etc. in one question. The underlying problem is that many Americans check the Hispanic box, but then find that as "mestizos" (people of mixed European/Indigenous heritage) there is no appropriate race box for them to check.
So here's what I wrote:
In this comment, I argue that the race and ethnicity classifications should not be combined into a single question. There is only one "ethnic" classification recognized by OMB, and that is "Hispanic/Latino." Hispanic/Latino is much too diverse to be considered a true ethnicity to begin with, and, as a classification that includes people of any combination of Indigenous, European, African, and Asian origin, with classification members whose appearances reflect the broad range of human appearances, it's absurd to treat it as akin to a race by placing it in the same category as "white," "black," etc.
Rather, to the address the problems of the inappropriate "race" choices for Latinos, which creates confusion among those of partial or full Indigenous origin, the government should abolish the Hispanic/Latino ethnic classification, and instead add a racial "Indigenous Latino/Mestizo" classification. White Hispanics would check the white box. Black Hispanics would check the black box. And Hispanics of Indigenous origin would check the Indigenous Latino/Mestizo box. People of mixed background could check whichever combination of boxes applied to their background.
In my book, Classified: The Untold Story of Racial Classification in America (Bombardier Press 2022), chapters 1 and 2 tell the story of how "Hispanic/Latino" became an official American minority classification. In brief, identification for federal statistical purposes, which started in the 1950s for federal contract compliance, was originally not self-identified, but instead relied on employers and others to identify members of minority groups by sight. Many Puerto Rican and Mexican Americans have dark complexions, revealing full or partial non-European ancestry. As a result, these individuals were both subject to racial discrimination, which meant that they were seen as needing federal protection, but also they could be identified as "nonwhite" by those in charge of classifying them.
Over the next two decades, various political forces, including Richard Nixon's White House and certain activist groups, thought it useful to create an umbrella designation for all American with origins in Spanish-speaking countries. At the same time, in the early 1970s classification began a dramatic shift to self-identification.
Suddenly, millions of people who had always been considered, and considered themselves, to be white based on full or dominant European heritage, were now deemed to be members of a "Hispanic" minority. But recognizing the absurdity of considering the multi-racial Hispanic classification to be a separate race, Statistical Directive 15 instead dictated that "Hispanic" was an ethnic classification, the only official ethnic classification the federal government recognizes.
[Comment then continues with material on the history of the Hispanic classification from my book Classified, discussing the arbitrariness of the classification….]
That said, some Hispanics face discrimination based on being of the perception that they are members of a nonwhite race, because they have a substantial percentage of Asian, African, or (most often) Indigenous heritage. Hispanics who are of full or partial Asian or African descent currently can check off the "Hispanic" box, and then Asian or African. However, many Hispanics, likely including the vast majority of those who check off the other "some other race" box on forms when available, are of mixed European and Indigenous origin (known in much of Latin America as "Mestizos"), or fully of Indigenous origin.
Thanks to strong opposition from American Indian groups, the Directive 15 definition of American Indian excludes Indigenous Americans who do not descend from North American (excluding Mexico) tribes.
The solution to that problem is not to treat "Hispanicness" as a race, or the equivalent of a race. There is no logical reason why a self-identified white person of European descent from Argentina or Spain should be in a different "racial" classification than a white person from Greece, Italy, or France.
Rather, to give Hispanics an opportunity to self-identify by their racial background, the Hispanic/Latino category should be abolished entirely. White Hispanics would check the white box. Black Hispanics would check the black box. And Hispanics of Indigenous origin would check the box for a new category called something like Indigenous Latino/Mestizo. People of mixed background could check whichever combination of boxes applied to their background.
Like the barrier to including Indigenous-origin Latinos in the Native American classification, the barrier to creating an Indigenous Latino/Mestizo classification is primarily political; Latino groups and activists oppose such a classification because it would substantially reduce their constituent numbers.
If OMB chooses not to replace the Hispanic/Latino ethnic classification with a narrower Indigenous Latino racial classification, it should modify the current classification so that it is more akin to a true ethnic classification. Currently, the classification requires only that a person be of "Spanish origin or culture." Instead, the classification should require "Spanish origin with significant ties to Spanish or Latino culture." Currently, everyone from Sephardic Jews whose ancestors left Spain around 1492 to people with one distant Mexican American ancestor, with the rest European, may qualify as Hispanic, regardless of their lack of ties to Hispanic or Latino culture. An individual with distant Spanish-speaking ancestry and no ties to the Hispanic and Latino culture can hardly be said to belong to the same "ethnic group" as a recent immigrant from Guatemala, and including them in the same group drastically reduces any usefulness the classification may have.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
They should just change it to be "everyone with any ancestors from anywhere in the Americas south of the US, or anywhere on the Iberian Peninsula." After all, if everyone with any ancestors from anywhere in the entire continent of Asia are all exactly the same, why not?
Which country most successfully classified people by race/ethnicity and what was the outcome?
I doubt that even they would at sight consider Irene Urdangarín y de Borbón cousin of Leonor de Todos los Santos de Borbón y Ortiz to be Hispanic
In what sense was the CSA "unsuccessful" at race classification?
That is probably not the comment Prof. Bernstein was hoping to see.
I want a box that says "Human Race"
23andme says I am mix of bunch of stuff and my kids have even more mixes. Why is any this stuff important?
Because! and you're a Race-ist/Sex-eist/Homo-Trans-fobe for even questioning!!!!!!!!!!!! Consider yourself "Cancelled" (Just kidding, who do you even contact to "Cancel" somebody? do I contact AG Merrick the Elephant Man Garland about the POTUS's Felonious Cocaine Addict Son (Plenty of Sailors have been prosecuted for what "Hunter" got "Dismissed"(Military Jargon for "Officer Dishonorable Discharge/Felony Conviction) Hey, this is a "Legal" Blog, somebody tell me I'm fucked up...
and it's nice being a Jew with an Irish surname, so I need to report to every job "Yes, I'm a Jew, I didn't kill Jesus..."
Frank
I had a work-study job in the distant past when the demand first came in that I race-self-identify so I wrote “Klingon”. My boss said HE would check the right box (presumably “White”) if I didn’t change my answer. I probably knuckled under, but don't really recall.
Now, the story is that my Ashkenazi mother was knocked up by a Cuban named Anhelo Rodrigues at some upstate New York art colony, but I have no proof of that (her then-boyfriend’s name went on the brith certificate) . No sight of Amerind in my appearance that I can detect and I haven’t tried 23andme. So could I get away with claiming to be Hispanic or would the gummint view that as Fauxcahonting? I presume that it must have SOME standard for declaring Fauxcahonting illegitimate. Or is Rachel Dolezol actually a member of the Black “protected class” if she still (or again) says so?
I had a work-study job in the distant past when the demand first came in that I race-self-identify so I wrote “Klingon”.
You were destined to wind up at this blog, at this website, and at the disaffected fringe of modern America.
Better than winding up as one of Jerry Sandusky's "recruits"
And I identify as a Vulcan, logically.
You don’t really think they’ll take your proposal seriously as written do you? Using “ Indigenous Latino/Mestizo”?
Got to change it to “ Indigenous LatinX/Mestizo” to get a serious look.
Surely it should be "Mestizx" to be woke-compliant.
Also, isn't that a Superman villain?
Oh hell! Everything else has been turned into a matter of race (or gender---however many of them there is today), so why can't Hispanics have their own designated race? Or gender a well for that matter!
When you watch the modern world from your porch, seething about all of this damned progress and pining for illusory "good old days," are you wearing a housedress from Big Lots, a t-shirt from Dollar General, or a knockoff Trump shirt?
Probably where you get your dresses, Jerry, "Dress Barn"
How about they stop asking about race all together and start treating people equally like the Constitution demands?
This is what should've happened after the Civil War. And definitely after the Jim Crow era was legally ended. That it didn't is a shame and an ongoing disaster.
They could even just judge peoples by the content of their characters, like Martin Lucifer said.
Exactly right.
What gets me is that French immigrants could move to Bolivia and their kids, if born in Bolivia, could legitimately claim Hispanic/Latino classification because the definition is so broad. I've seen more than my fair share of "Hispanics" who speak Spanish, but are blond haired and blue eyed. Makes no sense. How is that person discriminated against.
I fought to mention Japanese nationals who move to Chile or other South American countries. Can their children claim to be Hispanic? Which leads me another issue I've seen - Non-South American or Central American Hispanic cultures, i.e. Hispanics that move to another nation or other former Spanish Empire nations. For example, the Philippines was ruled by Spain for four centuries. Nearly all of the Philippine presidents have Spanish surnames - Ramos, Garcia, Arroyo, Marcos, etc. They share some of the cultural attributes (i.e. Catholics) and borrow some of the language. They were immigrants to the US since at least the 1890s, worked along side Mexican migrants in the fields, and faced the same type of discrimination because they could not be distinguished from Mexicans. How is the classification consistent when a person clearly has a Hispanic heritage, but does not live in South or Central America?
"I fought to mention Japanese nationals who move to Chile or other South American countries. Can their children claim to be Hispanic?"
Absolutely.
Re Filipinos, one "political" reason why Hispanic hasn't been in the race section is that "Asian American" groups were fearful that some Filipinos would check Hispanic and not Asian, reducing their numbers. Less of a concern now, I expect, b/c Filipinos are a smaller % of the Asian American population, and the idea that they are Asians has become entrenched.
I find it interesting that someone with a surname of Arroyo and Garcia is considered not Hispanic. Is there any logical reason they should not be? Even more interesting is that someone with a surname of Petersen or Scott can be Hispanic just based on the nation they were born in.
They'll never be one of Senescent J's court picks, they have to be real Spicks, like Louis CK
Biden's "you ain't black" comment seems to tell us what these categories really mean, so I will just put down "American" and leave it at that. Teddy Roosevelt would approve.
Better just "human".
".