The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
From My Commonplace Book, No. 5
Lon Fuller on the rule of law
[Earlier posts in this series: No. 1 / No. 2 / No. 3 / No. 4]
From Lon Fuller, "The Principles of Social Order":
My final conclusion is that, like many other precious human goals, the rule of law may best be achieved by not aiming at it directly. What is perhaps most needed is not an immediate expansion of international law, but an expansion of international community, multiplying and strengthening the bonds of reciprocity among nations. When this has occurred -- or rather as this occurs -- the law can act as a kind of midwife -- or, to change the figure, the law can act as a gardener who prunes an imperfectly growing tree in order to help the tree realize its own capacity for perfection. This can occur only when all concerned genuinely want the tree to grow and to grow properly. Our task is to make them want this.
I'm a huge Lon Fuller fan; if you are unfamiliar with his work, I would start with "The Morality of Law," which is, in my opinion, one of the truly great works of legal theory. The above quotation, from an essay on international law, packs a lot of interesting ideas into a short and rather brilliantly-phrased paragraph: that many "precious human goals" can best be achieved by a kind of misdirection, or averted vision; that the law is like a gardener pruning a tree "to help the tree realize its own capacity for perfection"; and that "our task" is to help "all concerned" to "genuinely want" it to reach that state.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Professor Post, how can I collect on our wager; the Russia/Ukraine wager?
John - send me an email - david dot g dot post at gmail dot com
That concept of averted or paradoxical vision is a long-running theme in U.S.A. history.
For example, Jefferson (and Madison, to a minutely lesser degree) found the need to deliberately inject politics into the university to prevent the wrong-type of political thought from infecting students' minds: regarding that intrusion into Jefferson's otherwise unfettered concept of the freedom to learn, one author commented that "The United States was already witnessing, in a quiet, educational context, the paradox of restricting freedom in order to preserve the most fundamental freedom of all -- a democratic society." [Adrienne Koch. _Jefferson and Madison: The Great Collaboration_. 1950, pp 275-276.]
It is also interesting that Jefferson focused on the freedom to _learn_, distinguishing it from the freedom to _teach_: each student was free to hear whatever lectures he desired yet the professor was constrained, to a degree, by the governing Visitors' acceptances of texts and topics. Again, an interesting paradox.
I used to visit Fr Gerard Sloyan at Temple. Great man.
What perfection is for anything is a final cause, the full development of what it already is in nuce.
That stuff about International Law sounds good but it isn't.Chantal Delsol looks at the facts and a reviewer puts it this way:
"But is the International Court able to judge Chinese authorities for what they have done in Tibet? or put Putin in the dock for crimes committed in Chechnya? Of course not. So for the time being "international criminal justice is ... a sort of private vengeance ... I punish my neighbor ... because I can.""
This is a wonderful series.
Thank you! So much food for thought.
Fuller has such a lovely way of saying, the law can only be so good as man is good.
Has a point there.