The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Today in Supreme Court History: December 6, 1865
12/6/1865: The 13th Amendment is ratified.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
That went well...
https://humantraffickingsearch.org/2017627modern-day-slavery-many-southern-states-have-prison-inmates-working-in-governors-mansions-and-capitol-buildings/
https://www.vianolavie.org/2022/08/16/modern-day-slavery-through-the-prison-system/
"work inside the capitol on three different crews. These crews are one for the senate, house, and governor’s office suite"
My god, Moping floors, doing laundry and taking out garbage! The horror!
I guess I'm a slave too.
No, Bob, you are not a slave. You are a disaffected, stale-thinking bigot from the desolate part of Ohio that is a walking corpse . . . and the target audience of this white, male, right-wing, faux libertarian blog.
Good one Jerry, how's Penn State looking for the Rose Bowl??? (Jeez, remember when the Rose Bowl meant something??)
Joe Paterno and Jerry Sandusky were -- in addition to gigantic hypocrites and stains on decent society -- registered Republicans and reliable supporters of conservative causes in Pennsylvania's deplorable backwaters.
Carry on, clingers.
(Try to imagine how pathetic it must be to be a Republican, Catholic or evangelical Penn State or Baylor fan these days.)
As a long-suffering fan of the Detroit Lions, after reading the name "Calvin Johnson," I thought maybe this was going to be an argument that having to play for that team violated the 13th Amendment. Obviously it's a different Calvin, but I would still be willing to give a fair hearing to the argument I imagined.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/sep/27/slavery-loophole-unpaid-labor-in-prisons
As the de facto foreign correspondent for VC, got any examples of how prisoners are treated on the enlightened continent?
Don't tu quoque this.
Hows about we work on cleaning our own mess, and not make excuses for it.
The incentives we set up here are awful.
Fuck you, you control freak. Now you direct who can ask a question?
"cleaning our own mess"
What mess? Prisoners doing productive labor to occupy their time and taxpayers get the cost of prisons offset. Win, win.
Yes. Marvellous how many cost savings you can create with some nice, pleasant slavery.
They committed crimes, its punishment, not slavery.
Don't want to clean the governor mansion, don't commit crimes.
You realise that your "make criminals suffer as much as possible" stance puts you on the same side as Iran and Saudi-Arabia in this debate, right? If you're going to punish people by enslaving them, why not cut their hands off or whip them?
If only I had supplied some links to articles that answer that question...
In a nutshell, what civilised countries do is not make work mandatory, and pay at least minimum wage for the work that is done.
Thank you.
No, what you mean is you define civilised countries as those which take money from the workers and give it to the bums.
"bums"
Not even, bums are usually harmless. Its taking money from victims and giving to predators.
I define "civilised countries" as "countries that don't enslave people", yes. I'm silly that way.
You are a very silly person, yes.
Its punishment for crimes, not slavery
Forcing people to work for almost-nothing as a punishment is slavery. It's what they replaced slavery with back in the day, rounding up black men for minor or made-up crimes, giving them long sentences and forcing them to work for nothing.
"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."
Slavery is still constitutional in the US, in the case of convicted criminals, as part of their punishment.
Is prison itself slavery or just uncompensated work?
I would just say the work.
But what makes work “slavery” isn’t the level of compensation. It’s not having a choice about doing it.
I don’t really see the problem with requiring prisoners to work, so long as it’s not outrageously harsh or dangerous work. They’re not in prison to take a vacation, after all. Might as well get some useful work out of them.
And it certainly isn’t a constitutional violation, the 13th amendment explicitly permits it, as the linked to article concedes.
Sure, it infringes their rights. So does locking them up! So that’s hardly a valid point.
The only valid argument I see against prison labor is that it might potentially create nasty incentives for the criminal justice system, if any of the profits made their way back to it.
". . . so long as it’s not outrageously harsh or dangerous work."
Agree and will add that any/all work should meet state and federal safety standards including hours worked, etc.
But what makes work “slavery” isn’t the level of compensation. It’s not having a choice about doing it.
My earlier reply seems to have gotten stuck in moderation, but yes and no. From that Guardian article, first there is this:
And then there is the question of how voluntary the work is, if there are consequences to not working:
and
I don't see any basis for the "no" in your quotes. Forced to work without pay is forced to work. But so is being forced to work WITH pay. They're both slavery, because you don't get a choice about working.
And I'm glad to count those 'consequences' as force, if the baseline conditions with the consequences are bad enough.
But, again, so what? We're taking about people being punished. They're locked up, that's a rights violation, too.
I just don't see why locking them up is OK, but requiring them to do some work isn't.
Not being forced to pay as long as you're happy to starve or spend your time in solitary is also being forced to work. (If you like, think of how someone who is being held at gunpoint is free to hand over their wallet or not.)
And indeed, this is another example of where I wanted to flag the problem without expecting to convince anybody. Many Americans have profoundly different values than civilised countries do.
(Then again, in Japan they execute people without any advance warning. What does that make them??)
Imagine if you paid them fairly for their work, they might end up with enough money banked not to feel the need to go back to criming when they got out.
Anyway, this support for exploitation and profiteering from a literal captive work-force in the context of people claiming that baking a cake for a gay marriage is tantamount to slavery is kind of grim.
The only valid argument I see against prison labor is that it might potentially create nasty incentives for the criminal justice system, if any of the profits made their way back to it.
Might potentially? I'd say the probability is pretty decent, as is the chance that the governor's buddy somehow gets to use the prisoners' labor.
Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319 (decided December 6, 1937): Fifth Amendment's prohibition of double jeopardy did not apply to the states (upholding Connecticut statute allowing prosecution to appeal a lesser-charge conviction so as to get retrial on more serious charge) (abrogated by Benton v. Maryland, 1969)
Salman v. United States, 580 U.S. 39 (decided December 6, 2016): in prosecution under §10-b of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, jury could infer that source of information (here, as to potential mergers/acquisitions) received a personal benefit from the tip (this is necessary for conviction under §10-b) because he was brother-in-law of defendant (who made about $1.5 million trading on the information) even though source did not make any $ himself
Reich v. Collins, 513 U.S. 106 (decided December 6, 1994): Georgia Supreme Court can't retroactively construe its statute allowing refund of illegally collected taxes so as to avoid refunding a tax on federal retirement benefits which had been declared unconstitutional (by Davis v. Michigan Dept. of Treasury, 1989)
Great Trivia question, which 3 states were the last to have legal Slavery? Spoiler alert, none were in the Confederacy.
Are you counting marriage laws, because we all know traditional marriage is a form of slavery?
Hey Ohhhhhhh............. Take my Wife, Please!!! I take her everywhere but she keeps finding her way back!
Missouri, Kentucky, and Delaware. That hardly seems surprising, given the legal logic of the Emancipation Proclamation.
One wonders how those last few slaves were treated. Both master and slave knew freedom would come any day.
Master: Pitch that hay!
Slave: (yawn) Maybe.
More like,
Slave: Where my hut at?
Master: You mean my hut? now get off my property!!!
In 1863 the Netherlands abolished slavery in its colonies, but required the slaves to keep working for another 10 years. That's much worse.
The masters knew that they'd be compensated for their losses. The slaves not so much.
"Missouri"
Fake news. It was New Jersey.